FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3166502010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3166502010 abstract "This is an essay on Professor Sarah A. Seo’s new book, Policing the Open Road: How Cars Transformed American Freedom (Harvard Univ. Press 2019). I focus on Professor Seo’s analysis of Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) and Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949). Carroll is important not only because it was the Court’s first car case. Understanding Carroll (and Brinegar, which solidified and expanded Carroll’s holding) is essential because, nearly one hundred years later, its logic continues to direct how the modern Court resolves Fourth Amendment claims of motorists. Put simply, a majority of today’s Justices view the Fourth Amendment rights of motorists essentially the same way that a majority of the Justices did in 1925. Specifically, Part I highlights Seo’s major assertions regarding Carroll; Carroll’s influence on another controversial search and seizure decision, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), which upheld an officer’s power to stop and frisk a person he suspects is armed and dangerous; and finally, Carroll’s connection to the police authority upheld by the Justices that permits the discretionary and discriminatory policing that currently pervades America’s highways and roads.Part II of this essay focuses on the modern Court’s understanding of motorists’ privacy. Carroll’s vision of how the Fourth Amendment applies to searching cars was not inescapable. While many lawyers and law students today might not believe it, not so long ago several members of the Burger Court took the view that cars should be treated like other effects under the Fourth Amendment – which meant the warrant requirement would apply to cars. Though a majority of Justices never embraced the view that warrants are required to search the interior of vehicles, in a series of cases the Court went back and forth on whether warrants were needed to search private containers found in vehicles. Part II examines these cases and the Court’s flawed norm that motorists have diminished privacy interests in closed containers found in cars when police have probable cause to search. One could view these cases as adopting a narrower view of motorists’ privacy rights than the view embraced by Carroll. More importantly, the understanding that currently permits warrantless searches of suitcases and purses under the automobile exception, if meant to be a neutral principle, would also allow warrantless searches of computers and cell phones found in cars. I examine whether today’s Court will apply the automobile exception to searches of computers, cell phones and other electronic devices found in vehicles." @default.
• W3166502010 created "2021-06-22" @default.
• W3166502010 creator A5023555747 @default.
• W3166502010 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W3166502010 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3166502010 title "Cops and Cars: How the Automobile Drove Fourth Amendment Law" @default.
• W3166502010 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3166502010 type Work @default.
• W3166502010 sameAs 3166502010 @default.
• W3166502010 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3166502010 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3166502010 hasAuthorship W3166502010A5023555747 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C140334061 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C2777189325 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C2779404633 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C61547137 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConcept C69775031 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C121332964 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C140334061 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C144024400 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C163258240 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C17744445 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C199539241 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C2777189325 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C2778272461 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C2779404633 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C61547137 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C62520636 @default.
• W3166502010 hasConceptScore W3166502010C69775031 @default.
• W3166502010 hasLocation W31665020101 @default.
• W3166502010 hasOpenAccess W3166502010 @default.
• W3166502010 hasPrimaryLocation W31665020101 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W1489446833 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W1517829001 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W1558711796 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W1569377503 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W1587798983 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W2102370022 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W2202151078 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W2240556009 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W2337179776 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W248210944 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W2731257159 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W2766961348 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W2990089162 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W2996126302 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W3122446781 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W3126142969 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W3201271025 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W574263705 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W75917398 @default.
• W3166502010 hasRelatedWork W3156237156 @default.
• W3166502010 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3166502010 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3166502010 magId "3166502010" @default.
• W3166502010 workType "article" @default.