Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3169456939> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W3169456939 endingPage "1144" @default.
- W3169456939 startingPage "1109" @default.
- W3169456939 abstract "This paper intends to show how the fabled violation of Bell’s inequality by the probabilistic specifications of quantum mechanics derives from a mathematical error, an error of neglect. I have no objection to the probabilities specified by quantum theory, nor to the inequality itself as characterized in the formulation of Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt. Designed to assess consequences of Einstein’s principle of local realism, the inequality pertains to a linear combination of four polarization products on the same pair of photons arising in a gedankenexperiment. My assessment displays that in this context, the summands of the relevant CHSH quantity s(λ) inhere four symmetric functional relations which have long been neglected in analytic considerations. Its expectation E[s(λ)] is not the sum of four “marginal” expectations from a joint distribution, as quantum theory explicitly avoids such a specification. Rather, I show that E[s(λ)] has four distinct representations as the sum of three expectations of polarization products plus the expectation of a fourth which is restricted to equal a function value determined by the other three. Analysis using Bruno de Finetti’s fundamental theorem of prevision (FTP) yields only a bound for E(s) within (1.1213,2] , surely not at all as is commonly understood. I exhibit slices of the 4-dimensional polytope of joint P++ probabilities actually motivated by quantum theory at the four stipulated angle settings, as it passes through 3-dimensional space. Bell’s inequality is satisfied everywhere within the convex hull of extreme distributions cohering with quantum theoretic specifications, even while in keeping with local realism. Aspect’s proposed “estimation” of E(s) near to is based on polarization products from different photon pairs that do not have embedded within them the functional relations inhering in the relevant gedankenexperiment. When one actively embeds the restrictions into Aspect’s estimation procedure, it yields an estimate of 1.7667, although this is not and cannot be definitive. While my analysis supports the subjectivist construction of probability as clarifying issues relevant to the interpretation of quantum theory, the error resolved herein is purely mathematical. It pertains to the reconsideration of Bell violation irrespective of one’s attitude toward the meaning of probability." @default.
- W3169456939 created "2021-06-22" @default.
- W3169456939 creator A5030831726 @default.
- W3169456939 date "2021-01-01" @default.
- W3169456939 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W3169456939 title "Quantum Violation of Bell’s Inequality: A Misunderstanding Based on a Mathematical Error of Neglect" @default.
- W3169456939 cites W1986407511 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2014306526 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2023241797 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2028815089 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2039004790 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2065192689 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2084883086 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2117331689 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2125772622 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2136633939 @default.
- W3169456939 cites W2331410052 @default.
- W3169456939 doi "https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.128067" @default.
- W3169456939 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3169456939 type Work @default.
- W3169456939 sameAs 3169456939 @default.
- W3169456939 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W3169456939 countsByYear W31694569392022 @default.
- W3169456939 countsByYear W31694569392023 @default.
- W3169456939 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3169456939 hasAuthorship W3169456939A5030831726 @default.
- W3169456939 hasBestOaLocation W31694569391 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C118615104 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C121040770 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C128108043 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C145691206 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C49937458 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConcept C84114770 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C105795698 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C118615104 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C121040770 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C121332964 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C128108043 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C144237770 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C145691206 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C33923547 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C49937458 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C62520636 @default.
- W3169456939 hasConceptScore W3169456939C84114770 @default.
- W3169456939 hasIssue "08" @default.
- W3169456939 hasLocation W31694569391 @default.
- W3169456939 hasLocation W31694569392 @default.
- W3169456939 hasOpenAccess W3169456939 @default.
- W3169456939 hasPrimaryLocation W31694569391 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W1519298139 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W1546646004 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W1969324981 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W1998973221 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W2070154657 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W2413523239 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W2803769118 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W3017240378 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W3026227966 @default.
- W3169456939 hasRelatedWork W4221061266 @default.
- W3169456939 hasVolume "12" @default.
- W3169456939 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3169456939 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3169456939 magId "3169456939" @default.
- W3169456939 workType "article" @default.