FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3173037405> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3173037405 abstract "Abstract Background Collaborative and stepped care (CSC) models are recommended for mental disorders. Their successful implementation depends on effective collaboration between involved care providers from primary and specialist care. To gain insights into the collaboration experiences of care providers in CSC against the backdrop of usual mental health care, a qualitative process evaluation was realized as part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial (COMET) of a collaborative and stepped care model in Hamburg (Germany). Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with N = 24 care providers from primary and specialist care (outpatient psychotherapists and psychiatrists, inpatient/ day clinic mental health providers) within and outside of COMET at the trial’s beginning and 12 months later. Interviews were analyzed applying a qualitative structuring content analysis approach, combining deductive and inductive category development. Results Usual mental health care was considered deficient in resources, with collaboration being scarce and mainly taking place in small informal networks. Within the COMET trial, quicker referral paths were welcomed, as were quarterly COMET network meetings which provided room for exchange and fostered mutual understanding. Yet, also in COMET, collaboration remained difficult due to communication problems, the unfavorable regional distribution of the COMET care providers and interprofessional discrepancies regarding each profession’s role, competencies and mutual esteem. Ideas for improvement included more localized networks, the inclusion of further professions and the overall amelioration of mental health care regarding resources and remuneration, especially for collaborative activities. Conclusions The process evaluation of the COMET trial revealed the benefits of creating room for interprofessional encounter to foster collaborative care. Despite the benefits of faster patient referrals, the COMET network did not fulfill all care providers’ prior expectations. A focus should be set on interprofessional competencies, mutual perception and role clarification, as these have been revealed as significant barriers to collaboration within CSC models such as COMET. Trial registration The COMET trial (Collaborative and Stepped Care in Mental Health by Overcoming Treatment Sector Barriers) has been registered on July 24, 2017 under the trial registration number NCT03226743 ." @default.
• W3173037405 created "2021-06-22" @default.
• W3173037405 creator A5009492108 @default.
• W3173037405 creator A5018460597 @default.
• W3173037405 creator A5025672152 @default.
• W3173037405 creator A5054544454 @default.
• W3173037405 creator A5069564583 @default.
• W3173037405 creator A5078610104 @default.
• W3173037405 creator A5081894060 @default.
• W3173037405 date "2021-06-08" @default.
• W3173037405 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3173037405 title "How do care providers evaluate collaboration? - qualitative process evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of collaborative and stepped care for patients with mental disorders" @default.
• W3173037405 cites W1918805697 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W1922178820 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W1977754542 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2002452699 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2010225731 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2026172520 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2081089126 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2081753990 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2085001923 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2122580757 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2123118442 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2124199620 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2138664283 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2160187477 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2266094499 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2410862180 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2566791490 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2590129010 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2621704975 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2767741183 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2789803033 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2888886867 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2896101403 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2931211518 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2981592857 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W2990708840 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W3004997478 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W3028463594 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W3043114262 @default.
• W3173037405 cites W3048316736 @default.
• W3173037405 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03274-3" @default.
• W3173037405 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8184353" @default.
• W3173037405 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34098913" @default.
• W3173037405 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3173037405 type Work @default.
• W3173037405 sameAs 3173037405 @default.
• W3173037405 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3173037405 countsByYear W31730374052023 @default.
• W3173037405 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3173037405 hasAuthorship W3173037405A5009492108 @default.
• W3173037405 hasAuthorship W3173037405A5018460597 @default.
• W3173037405 hasAuthorship W3173037405A5025672152 @default.
• W3173037405 hasAuthorship W3173037405A5054544454 @default.
• W3173037405 hasAuthorship W3173037405A5069564583 @default.
• W3173037405 hasAuthorship W3173037405A5078610104 @default.
• W3173037405 hasAuthorship W3173037405A5081894060 @default.
• W3173037405 hasBestOaLocation W31730374051 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C176400912 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C2781018821 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C118552586 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C134362201 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C141071460 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C144024400 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C15744967 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C159110408 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C160735492 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C162324750 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C168563851 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C176400912 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C190248442 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C27415008 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C2776135927 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C2781018821 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C36289849 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C50522688 @default.
• W3173037405 hasConceptScore W3173037405C71924100 @default.
• W3173037405 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3173037405 hasLocation W31730374051 @default.
• W3173037405 hasLocation W31730374052 @default.
• W3173037405 hasOpenAccess W3173037405 @default.
• W3173037405 hasPrimaryLocation W31730374051 @default.
• W3173037405 hasRelatedWork W109869732 @default.
• W3173037405 hasRelatedWork W2027526049 @default.

• next