FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3173515207> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3173515207 endingPage "35" @default.
• W3173515207 startingPage "23" @default.
• W3173515207 abstract "The unique significance and social value of heritage monuments across the world prompted many governments to work out strategies to protect their viewscapes. The Sacred heritage monuments and their viewscape are important to the overall quality of our communities, the views and visual relationships towards these monuments foster emotional bonding between people and them. In India, many such sacred heritage monuments are surrounded by new urban development which destroy the historical connection between people and monuments. In south Indian cities like Madurai, Trichy, Srirangam, Thanjavur, etc. the sacred gopurams dominates the city plan at the center. These sacred monuments were constructed in such a position that they would dominate the surrounding area, providing a focal point for the town or city. The view of such gopurams has significance for various stakeholders like the local residents and tourist etc. Today there is a threat to this viewscape, the urban development which is happening in the immediate setting of these monuments is obscuring the visual dominance, importance or its aesthetic contribution once these monuments had to the townscape. These sacred monuments have been built to be viewed and worshipped from far as well as near. The sacred monuments which once stood in isolation and dominated their surrounding are now in danger of being lost to views. They no longer have their visual relationships in the wider setting and many cases they are likely to lose in the immediate setting. This problem is caused mainly by the increase in the density and height of the surrounding development which is also not coherent with the historic structures. The existing legislation provides a buffer zone around the monuments as prohibited and regulated areas, but they do not guide the development around the monuments or protect the visual relationship. Several visual preference studies have been done in the areas of landscape planning, architecture, and urban design. But there is a lack of tools / guidelines to assess the views and visual relationships of sacred historic monument and the stakeholders perceptual, affective and cognitive responses to such environments. There is strong need to investigate the visual relationship of monuments and their settings and the associated public value they inherit. The aim of this study is to form a literature basis for a research on viewscape of sacred heritage monuments. This paper will critically review all available literature on viewscape and legislations related with protection of viewscape." @default.
• W3173515207 created "2021-07-05" @default.
• W3173515207 creator A5053905536 @default.
• W3173515207 creator A5082289399 @default.
• W3173515207 date "2017-05-03" @default.
• W3173515207 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3173515207 title "Protecting the Viewscape and Visual Relationship of Sacred Heritage Monuments in South India – A Case of Gopurams of Tamil Nadu" @default.
• W3173515207 doi "https://doi.org/10.37628/jaip.v3i1.133" @default.
• W3173515207 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W3173515207 type Work @default.
• W3173515207 sameAs 3173515207 @default.
• W3173515207 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3173515207 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3173515207 hasAuthorship W3173515207A5053905536 @default.
• W3173515207 hasAuthorship W3173515207A5082289399 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConcept C140688305 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConcept C18918823 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConceptScore W3173515207C107038049 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConceptScore W3173515207C124952713 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConceptScore W3173515207C140688305 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConceptScore W3173515207C142362112 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConceptScore W3173515207C166957645 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConceptScore W3173515207C18918823 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConceptScore W3173515207C205649164 @default.
• W3173515207 hasConceptScore W3173515207C95457728 @default.
• W3173515207 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3173515207 hasLocation W31735152071 @default.
• W3173515207 hasOpenAccess W3173515207 @default.
• W3173515207 hasPrimaryLocation W31735152071 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W1579677084 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W1843274293 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W1911745372 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W1947359001 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W1972270357 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W2062804218 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W2294937804 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W264584275 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W2759261212 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W2783455097 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W2884134168 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W2905249179 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W2946877699 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W3042399423 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W3042784612 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W3145831593 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W327027356 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W177601032 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W2992226604 @default.
• W3173515207 hasRelatedWork W91163410 @default.
• W3173515207 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W3173515207 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3173515207 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3173515207 magId "3173515207" @default.
• W3173515207 workType "article" @default.