FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3174987273> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3174987273 abstract "Purpose – This study mainly investigates two potential legal regimes expected to govern the use of electronic bills of lading: the Rotterdam Rules (2009) and the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (2017). Widespread use of electronic bills of lading has been unsuccessful partly due to the absence of a uniform legal regime and protracted uncertainties. This paper aims to carry out an assessment of the possibilities where either of two potential legal regimes could provide certainty to the effect and validity of the use of electronic bills of lading, and contribute to the facilitation of electronically transferring the rights to goods carried by sea. Design/methodology – This paper first introduces two legal instruments and the relevance to electronic bills of lading. Since neither of these legal instruments has yet entered into force, the following section looks into the ratification or enactment possibilities based on a literature review and track records of the past legal regimes of the same kind. Assessment of the different adoption possibilities further requires comparative work of the two legal instruments, which will be based on an analysis of relevant provisions and a literature review. The literature review on the Rotterdam Rules delves into various studies and data produced since the UNCITRAL’s adoption in 2009. The literature review on the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records heavily relies on UNCITRAL working group documents from 2011 to 2017 together with the final explanatory note. Findings – The main findings can be summarized as follows. Application of the Rotterdam Rules would negate the role of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records assisting in the implementation of the Rotterdam Rules due to some conflicting issues. Enactment of the UNCITRAL Model Law alone can sufficiently provide a higher level of certainty in the use and effect of electronic bills of lading so long as lawmakers and parties are aware of some issues with the application. What concerns potential users most is the extension of the status quo, where neither of the legal instruments have any effect. It is necessary to take a number of alternatives into consideration, such as promotion of standard clauses and confirmation by a court ruling. Originality/value – Existing studies focus either on the Rotterdam Rules or on the UNCITRAL Model Law, but not both. Not many papers have yet dealt with the Model Law, which was adopted by UNCITRAL only 2 years ago, particularly in the context of a potential legal regime for electronic bills of lading. This paper attempts to introduce the differences between the two legal instruments in regulating the use of electronic bills of lading while providing an assessment of the various possibilities for which parties involved in international trade can be better prepared for the changing legal environment." @default.
• W3174987273 created "2021-07-05" @default.
• W3174987273 creator A5073717243 @default.
• W3174987273 date "2020-04-06" @default.
• W3174987273 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3174987273 title "Assessment of Legal Instruments and Applicability to the Use of Electronic Bills of Lading" @default.
• W3174987273 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3174987273 type Work @default.
• W3174987273 sameAs 3174987273 @default.
• W3174987273 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3174987273 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3174987273 hasAuthorship W3174987273A5073717243 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C2779029474 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C2781334955 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C7493553 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C111472728 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C127413603 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C138885662 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C144133560 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C158154518 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C162324750 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C17744445 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C18762648 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C190253527 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C199539241 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C2779029474 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C2781334955 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C7493553 @default.
• W3174987273 hasConceptScore W3174987273C78519656 @default.
• W3174987273 hasLocation W31749872731 @default.
• W3174987273 hasOpenAccess W3174987273 @default.
• W3174987273 hasPrimaryLocation W31749872731 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W1569758793 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W1759571681 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2037453350 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2058996024 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2113665217 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W21950637 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2529246263 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2553132259 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2749737305 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2922118710 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W3014308545 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W3032210694 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W3118386284 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W3151963831 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W3185830816 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W3208203523 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W571877375 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W1502822041 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2186923397 @default.
• W3174987273 hasRelatedWork W2769013442 @default.
• W3174987273 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3174987273 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3174987273 magId "3174987273" @default.
• W3174987273 workType "article" @default.