FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3175773275> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3175773275 endingPage "107483" @default.
• W3175773275 startingPage "107483" @default.
• W3175773275 abstract "The transgressive dunefield of the Lagoa de Peixe Natural Park was modified drastically due to intensive pine plantation and the leeward development of the associated degraded areas. The present study analyzed the disturbances in the dunefield of the Lagoa do Peixe Natural Park due to pine tree plantation and the impact of the subsequent deforestation program conducted in the region. Aerial photographs, satellite images, and DGPS topographic data collected over a 70-year-long period were retrieved, analyzed, and compared, which allowed the observation of the geomorphological evolution of the dunefield. In addition, a profile of GPR on the inlet (during a period with the channel closed) was analyzed. In 1948, the surface of the sand barrier was occupied by high transverse dunes and low barchan dunes. Pine tree plantation on the inner side fixed the transgressive dunes and, consequently, avoided the filling of the shallow lagoon, although degraded areas were generated on the lee side of the pines. Simultaneous pine plantations in the backshore avoided the aeolian sediment input to the dunefield, generating a large interdune area along with the development of a few parabolic dunes, which resulted in cannibalization of the transgressive dunes. In 2001, pine trees occupied 15.03% of the total area analyzed in the present study, while the degraded area accounted for 10.81% of the total area. Progressive deforestation was performed (ring bound technique for tree gradual death), maintaining three lines of pines in contact with the dunes, to promote autochthonous vegetation growth, thereby preventing the filling of the adjacent lagoon with aeolian sediments. By the year 2018, the pine tree plantation area reduced to 3.25%, the dunefield area was 79.03%, and the extension of the degraded areas had increased and reached 17.71% of the total area. The pine tree plantation and the deforestation for conservation purposes are the main factors explaining the degradation of the dunefield during the period between 1948 and 2018, while regional climatic oscillations contributed as the secondary factor. Although internationally controversial, the present case study demonstrates that the removal of this exotic vegetation, through dune vegetation recovery programs, is often unsuccessful and may generate more degraded areas. However, in the case presented here, it was essential to remove the forest to ensure the dune field geodynamics and, therefore, the base (biotope) of the natural system (maintenance of the lagoon and the dunefield)." @default.
• W3175773275 created "2021-07-05" @default.
• W3175773275 creator A5000050995 @default.
• W3175773275 creator A5021221898 @default.
• W3175773275 creator A5026346537 @default.
• W3175773275 creator A5051749739 @default.
• W3175773275 creator A5066596511 @default.
• W3175773275 date "2021-09-01" @default.
• W3175773275 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3175773275 title "Degradation of a transgressive coastal Dunefield by pines plantation and strategies for recuperation (Lagoa Do Peixe National Park, Southern Brazil)" @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1276936723 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1905703885 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1964778437 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1967894357 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1970002712 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W197948218 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1980519202 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1984756548 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1987252864 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1990698036 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1995066224 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W1999431121 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2006265919 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2017219632 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2017880557 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2022602445 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2024208796 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2025872410 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2027758550 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2029332336 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2033324186 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2033930213 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2037101672 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2037969211 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2038526450 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2045705049 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2051381254 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2053035380 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2053513522 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2059189777 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2061326207 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2070097765 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2070987344 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2087256934 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2088739460 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2095883495 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2109135287 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2129361883 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2156717985 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2159906921 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2180701443 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2184976105 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2205136559 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2219919159 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2289717345 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2303331326 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2331655644 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2333286434 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2415942407 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2510793455 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2521897601 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2529053477 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2736527113 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2763919682 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2780035633 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2792516969 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2807645699 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2811183257 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2887037785 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2890915895 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2909616716 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2911673410 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2912301100 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2939277888 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2945386659 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2950909066 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W2988263609 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W3013140427 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W3029655957 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W3031663925 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W4248851718 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W644402370 @default.
• W3175773275 cites W776356122 @default.
• W3175773275 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107483" @default.
• W3175773275 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3175773275 type Work @default.
• W3175773275 sameAs 3175773275 @default.
• W3175773275 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3175773275 countsByYear W31757732752022 @default.
• W3175773275 countsByYear W31757732752023 @default.
• W3175773275 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3175773275 hasAuthorship W3175773275A5000050995 @default.
• W3175773275 hasAuthorship W3175773275A5021221898 @default.
• W3175773275 hasAuthorship W3175773275A5026346537 @default.
• W3175773275 hasAuthorship W3175773275A5051749739 @default.
• W3175773275 hasAuthorship W3175773275A5066596511 @default.
• W3175773275 hasBestOaLocation W31757732751 @default.
• W3175773275 hasConcept C100970517 @default.

• next