FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3176169612> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3176169612 abstract "Abstract Background The integration of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into clinical care presents many challenges for health systems. PROMs provide quantitative data regarding patient-reported health status. However, the most effective model for collecting PROMs has not been established. Therefore the purpose of this study is to report the development and preliminary evaluation of the standardized collection of PROMs within a department of orthopedic surgery at a large academic health center. Methods We utilized the Users’ Guide to Integrating Patient - Reported Outcomes in Electronic Health Records by Gensheimer et al., 2018 as a framework to describe the development of PROMs collection initiative. We framed our initiative by operationalizing the three aspects of PROM collection development: Planning, Selection, and Engagement. Next, we performed a preliminary evaluation of our initiative by assessing the response rate of patients completing PROMs (no. of PROMs completed/no. of PROMs administered) across the entire department (18 clinics), ambulatory clinics only (14 clinics), and hospital-based clinics only (4 clinics). Lastly, we reported on the mean response rates for the top 5 and bottom 5 orthopaedic providers to describe the variability across providers. Results We described the development of a fully-integrated, population health based implementation strategy leveraging the existing resources of our local EHR to maximize clinical utility of PROMs and routine collection. We collected a large volume of PROMs over a 13 month period ( n = 10,951) across 18 clinical sites, 7 clinical specialties and over 100 providers. The response rates varied across the department, ranging from 29 to 42%, depending on active status for the portal to the electronic health record (MyChart). The highest single provider mean response rate was 52%, and the lowest provider rate was 13%. Rates were similar between hospital-based (26%) and ambulatory clinics (29%). Conclusions We found that our standardized PROMs collection initiative, informed by Gensheimer et al., achieved scope and scale, but faced challenges in achieving a high response rate commensurate with existing literature. However, most studies reported a targeted recruitment strategy within a narrow clinical population. Further research is needed to elucidate the trade-off between scalability and response rates in PROM collection initiatives." @default.
• W3176169612 created "2021-07-05" @default.
• W3176169612 creator A5049993357 @default.
• W3176169612 creator A5057684093 @default.
• W3176169612 creator A5058688355 @default.
• W3176169612 creator A5064946210 @default.
• W3176169612 creator A5081425409 @default.
• W3176169612 date "2021-06-30" @default.
• W3176169612 modified "2023-10-08" @default.
• W3176169612 title "Electronic health record–integrated approach for collection of patient-reported outcome measures: a retrospective evaluation" @default.
• W3176169612 cites W1549788499 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W1597614727 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W1772968755 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W1819784724 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W1981551890 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W1983651981 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2028631776 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2068870877 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2094232837 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2121989194 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2162420979 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2314261856 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2321797768 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2523202671 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2606721258 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2620925856 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2685002355 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2750771813 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2801054072 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2810513666 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2885569577 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2890684238 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2905783264 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2915129517 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2949101834 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2951164133 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2959861314 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2961671828 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2979652222 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2980237274 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W2982177568 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W3015355965 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W3023835564 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W3110426851 @default.
• W3176169612 cites W854187735 @default.
• W3176169612 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06626-7" @default.
• W3176169612 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8247208" @default.
• W3176169612 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34193125" @default.
• W3176169612 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3176169612 type Work @default.
• W3176169612 sameAs 3176169612 @default.
• W3176169612 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W3176169612 countsByYear W31761696122022 @default.
• W3176169612 countsByYear W31761696122023 @default.
• W3176169612 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3176169612 hasAuthorship W3176169612A5049993357 @default.
• W3176169612 hasAuthorship W3176169612A5057684093 @default.
• W3176169612 hasAuthorship W3176169612A5058688355 @default.
• W3176169612 hasAuthorship W3176169612A5064946210 @default.
• W3176169612 hasAuthorship W3176169612A5081425409 @default.
• W3176169612 hasBestOaLocation W31761696121 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C137992405 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C145642194 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C2777364248 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C2779517570 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C518773536 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C9354725 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C105795698 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C111472728 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C131872663 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C133462117 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C137992405 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C138816342 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C138885662 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C145642194 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C159110408 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C160735492 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C162324750 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C2777364248 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C2779517570 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C2779951463 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C2908647359 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C33923547 @default.
• W3176169612 hasConceptScore W3176169612C50522688 @default.

• next