FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3176304498> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3176304498 abstract "Background Awake intubation is used most commonly in patients with a predicted difficult airway. There are situations where the safest method to secure an airway is to place an endotracheal tube in an awake and spontaneously breathing patient. Our aim was to compare the two modalities, airway nerve blocks and atomized lidocaine by the Laryngo-Tracheal Mucosal Atomization Device (LMA MADgic) airway for awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI). Methods A total of 50 patients with anticipated difficult airway requiring AFOI were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A received airway blocks (bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal nerve) each with 2 ml of 2% lidocaine and group B received airway anesthesia through atomized lidocaine by LMA MADgic using 10 ml of 2% lidocaine. Fiberoptic guided orotracheal intubation was then performed in both the groups using LMA MADgic as the conduit. The primary outcome measured was intubation time and the secondary outcome included quality of intubation, hemodynamic variables, and any adverse events. Results The intubation time was found to be significantly lower in Group A (63.80±7.86 seconds) as compared to Group B (184.96±13.38 seconds) (p=0.0001). The ease of intubation, intubating condition, and patient comfort were better in patients who received airway blocks. Group B had an increased number of coughing/gagging episodes as compared with Group A. Between the two groups, group A showed better hemodynamics and fewer episodes of desaturation than group B. Conclusion Upper airway nerve blocks provide faster intubation, adequate airway anesthesia, and less patient discomfort to aid in AFOI in patients with anticipated difficult airway as compared to topical anesthesia using an atomizer." @default.
• W3176304498 created "2021-07-05" @default.
• W3176304498 creator A5043287796 @default.
• W3176304498 creator A5053291773 @default.
• W3176304498 creator A5071202216 @default.
• W3176304498 date "2021-06-20" @default.
• W3176304498 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3176304498 title "A Comparative Study of Airway Nerve Blocks and Atomized Lidocaine by the Laryngo-Tracheal Mucosal Atomization Device (LMA MADgic) Airway for Oral Awake Fiberoptic Intubation" @default.
• W3176304498 cites W1986167255 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W2000229723 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W2011416491 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W2050672227 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W2058997200 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W209491754 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W2109913626 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W2140151549 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W2734921469 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W2744119705 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W4246378230 @default.
• W3176304498 cites W793428138 @default.
• W3176304498 doi "https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15772" @default.
• W3176304498 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8291090" @default.
• W3176304498 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34295582" @default.
• W3176304498 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3176304498 type Work @default.
• W3176304498 sameAs 3176304498 @default.
• W3176304498 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3176304498 countsByYear W31763044982022 @default.
• W3176304498 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3176304498 hasAuthorship W3176304498A5043287796 @default.
• W3176304498 hasAuthorship W3176304498A5053291773 @default.
• W3176304498 hasAuthorship W3176304498A5071202216 @default.
• W3176304498 hasBestOaLocation W31763044981 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C105922876 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C2776900724 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C2778029997 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C2780149897 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C2780978852 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C2909644182 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C105922876 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C141071460 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C2776900724 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C2778029997 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C2778716859 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C2780149897 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C2780978852 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C2909644182 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C42219234 @default.
• W3176304498 hasConceptScore W3176304498C71924100 @default.
• W3176304498 hasLocation W31763044981 @default.
• W3176304498 hasLocation W31763044982 @default.
• W3176304498 hasOpenAccess W3176304498 @default.
• W3176304498 hasPrimaryLocation W31763044981 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W1545601763 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W1898277211 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W1980062584 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W2145343242 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W2365171590 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W2583316630 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W2783799236 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W3028787224 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W3177311892 @default.
• W3176304498 hasRelatedWork W86704667 @default.
• W3176304498 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3176304498 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3176304498 magId "3176304498" @default.
• W3176304498 workType "article" @default.