Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3176559600> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 90 of
90
with 100 items per page.
- W3176559600 endingPage "285" @default.
- W3176559600 startingPage "253" @default.
- W3176559600 abstract "Background/Purpose: Developing and Maintaining quality in higher education is an essential aspect of the sustainability of universities. National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), India has developed a new model of HEIs assessment and accreditation from July 2017. Based on its assessment, NAAC announces the final result in the form of Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) between 0 to 4.0, which is a combination of evaluation of qualitative and quantitative metrics with three parts including peer team report, graphical representation based on quantitative metric, and institutional grade sheet. Out of more than 380 universities assessment out of about 950 universities as on 30/042021, only 9 universities have been graded as A++ letter grade by NAAC. Objectives: Study on Criteria wise performance of top nine A++ scored Indian Universities according to NAAC Accreditation, full scores obtained in various criteria with reasons, compare research performance and analyse it using ABC model of research productivity, the effect of organizational leaders as role models on the research output, and to critically analyse the organizational SWOC based on NAAC data and outcome. Design/Methodology/Approach: Analysis of information collected from self-study reports of NAAC A++ graded universities, comparing and analyzing criteria wise, and analyzing research productivity of these universities and their leaders using ABC model of annual Research performance framework. Findings/Result: Out of nine NAAC A++ graded universities, five universities got full scores in the Curricular Aspects criterion. The universities are ranked based on their overall scores in the accreditation process. Based on the scores obtained in different criteria, the strengths and weaknesses of these universities are studied. These nine universities are further ranked based on their annual research performance and the leaders/Vice-chancellors research annual research productivity by considering the last five years research productivity. It is observed that many vice-chancellors failed to contribute to universities research outcomes as role models and motivators to other researchers of these universities. A comparative study on research performance-based grading is found to be ambiguous and little disparity is observed on key indicator-based university grading. Based on observations, some general recommendations are suggested. Research limitations/implications: This study used the data from the Self-study Report, Peer Team Report, and Grade Report of respective universities kept for public reference in the NAAC website in accordance with the new accreditation framework, downloaded on 30/04/2021. Originality/Value: This paper compares the research performance of nine NAAC A++ accredited universities of India using their last 5 years’ research data and identifies the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges of these universities for further improvement. Paper Type: Explorative Research based on research analysis." @default.
- W3176559600 created "2021-07-05" @default.
- W3176559600 creator A5017982928 @default.
- W3176559600 creator A5042518168 @default.
- W3176559600 date "2021-06-23" @default.
- W3176559600 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3176559600 title "A Comparative Study on Research Performance of Indian Universities with NAAC A++ grade Accreditation" @default.
- W3176559600 cites W2460195036 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W2466347794 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W2971333616 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3024163240 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3040610632 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3081880328 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3096406963 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3109095437 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3109416826 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3110114716 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3113277327 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3121751235 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3133566553 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3157274655 @default.
- W3176559600 cites W3207977006 @default.
- W3176559600 doi "https://doi.org/10.47992/ijmts.2581.6012.0144" @default.
- W3176559600 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3176559600 type Work @default.
- W3176559600 sameAs 3176559600 @default.
- W3176559600 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3176559600 countsByYear W31765596002023 @default.
- W3176559600 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3176559600 hasAuthorship W3176559600A5017982928 @default.
- W3176559600 hasAuthorship W3176559600A5042518168 @default.
- W3176559600 hasBestOaLocation W31765596001 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C176217482 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C66204764 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C111472728 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C120912362 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C138885662 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C139719470 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C144133560 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C15744967 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C162324750 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C162853370 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C176217482 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C17744445 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C18903297 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C199539241 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C204983608 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C2779530757 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C509550671 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C61521584 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C66204764 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C71924100 @default.
- W3176559600 hasConceptScore W3176559600C86803240 @default.
- W3176559600 hasLocation W31765596001 @default.
- W3176559600 hasLocation W31765596002 @default.
- W3176559600 hasOpenAccess W3176559600 @default.
- W3176559600 hasPrimaryLocation W31765596001 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W2594453705 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W2730459471 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W2884778325 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W2964187867 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W2980201944 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W3161349679 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W3203125287 @default.
- W3176559600 hasRelatedWork W80317841 @default.
- W3176559600 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3176559600 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3176559600 magId "3176559600" @default.
- W3176559600 workType "article" @default.