FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3177593071> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3177593071 abstract "French Abstract: L’hypothese generale de cette etude est qu’aujourd’hui nous assistons a une sorte de « fabrication industrielle » du savoir juridique. Notamment, notre analyse des mutations transversales, qui ebranlent aujourd’hui l’academie juridique, est susceptible de demontrer l’essor de la division du travail, de la separation des phases du processus de production, de la specialisation, et d’autres corollaires de l’industrialisation.Nous commencerons par discuter ces dynamiques recentes en nous referant aux quatre axes de l’evolution de l’academie juridique enumeres par Francois Ost et Michel van de Kerchove (I). En decouvrant une cinquieme transformation, notamment, le processus de standardisation du savoir juridique (II), aussi bien qu’en discutant une approche manageriale de sa gestion (III), nous completerons l’analyse en montrant un angle nouveau du probleme. Nous conclurons en precisant que le savoir juridique est aujourd’hui en voie d’industrialisation (IV), et terminerons par quelques remarques finales.Afin de distinguer les changements pertinents, nous procederons par une methode utilisee dans les travaux d’Ost et van de Kerchove, en adressant les dynamiques transversales et structurelles plutot que juste un aspect, un auteur ou une ecole du savoir juridique.English Abstract: On the verge of the 19th and 20th centuries, Weber predicted that formal and substantive rationalisation, especially in forms of capitalism and bureaucracy, would occur not only in law, but also in many other spheres, including creation, both artistic and scientific. In 2014, we can fairly say that the problem of creativity did occur and is here to stay, regarding either art or science. Indeed, there is very little genuinely innovative, or even just controversial creation out there nowadays. In the era of post-modernity our society has created few revolutionary concepts, grand breakthroughs, or simply great achievements. Moreover, all it recently produced in either science or art appears as quite rational or rationalised models: a bigger computer network, a smaller computer (and derivatives such as smartphones and tablets). We are now listening to Nouvelle Vague's covers of the most famous hits, actually including the new wave movement's ones, while one of the greatest breakthrough in theater – the Actor's Studio - happened yet in the 1960s (and as a matter of fact was itself a modern adaptation of ideas of a Russian director from the late 19th century).The general hypothesis of the study done in this chapter is that today we assist to an 'industrialisation' of the legal academia. That is, the analysis of the uncovered dynamics in the scholarship, and their effects on it, shows that they bring to scholarship the division of stages of production process, specialisation, ranking, competition, and other corollaries of industrialisation. It is assumed here that the legal scholarship, or legal science, embraces both the doctrine, or science of law, and the jurisprudence, or the science about law, while, though, understanding the difference between the two dimensions. The problem is that some recent developments could well demonstrate a new face of the legal scholarship that emerges today: much less dual, immersed by the day-to-day problems and shortcomings. At present, could it rather be qualified as 'utility works', rather than 'opinion and understanding', of law? One explanation could be that today we assist at a mutation of a Professorenrecht into a model characterised by technical expertise, pragmatism and a meticulous attention to the slightest detail. This could at least be said regarding a particular legal organisation - formal and systematised - of the Continental law model. Such a paradigm shift will be discussed through first referring to the four lines of transformations, highlighted by Ost and van de Kerchove i.e. specialisation, acceleration, over-information, and consultancy activities of legal scholars. It will then discuss the discovery of the fifth transformation - very recent - namely, the process of standardisation of legal scholarship - that complements the analysis and shows it from a new angle. The chapter concludes that, eventually, legal scholarship is indeed being industrialised and produced 'a la chaine'.This study engages not only into pros and cons-type analysis of the industrialisation-like process within legal academia, but also in a more critical enquiry of political dimensions of such dynamics, in particular, exploring distributional consequences, i.e. who is advantaged/disadvantaged, empowered/disempowered, in different situations." @default.
• W3177593071 created "2021-07-19" @default.
• W3177593071 creator A5017083717 @default.
• W3177593071 date "2014-12-01" @default.
• W3177593071 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3177593071 title "La production à la chaîne du savoir juridique (The Chain of Production of Legal Scholarship)" @default.
• W3177593071 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W3177593071 type Work @default.
• W3177593071 sameAs 3177593071 @default.
• W3177593071 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3177593071 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3177593071 hasAuthorship W3177593071A5017083717 @default.
• W3177593071 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3177593071 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W3177593071 hasConceptScore W3177593071C138885662 @default.
• W3177593071 hasConceptScore W3177593071C15708023 @default.
• W3177593071 hasLocation W31775930711 @default.
• W3177593071 hasOpenAccess W3177593071 @default.
• W3177593071 hasPrimaryLocation W31775930711 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W1553642333 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W158137500 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W1685575963 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W1792516402 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W1832272874 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W1968078802 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W1983500720 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W2014224694 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W2070552410 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W2123144762 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W2125229259 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W230748083 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W2474067469 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W2610885289 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W2620782015 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W2785136984 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W284133330 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W301135893 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W76045681 @default.
• W3177593071 hasRelatedWork W777130701 @default.
• W3177593071 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3177593071 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3177593071 magId "3177593071" @default.
• W3177593071 workType "article" @default.