FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3178683465> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3178683465 endingPage "e27174" @default.
• W3178683465 startingPage "e27174" @default.
• W3178683465 abstract "User-friendly information at the point of care for health care professionals should be well structured, rapidly accessible, comprehensive, and trustworthy. The reliability of information and the associated methodological process must be clear. There is no standard tool to evaluate the trustworthiness of such point-of-care (POC) information.We aim to develop and validate a new tool for assessment of trustworthiness of evidence-based POC resources to enhance the quality of POC resources and facilitate evidence-based practice.We designed the Critical Appraisal of Point-of-Care Information (CAPOCI) tool based on the criteria important for assessment of trustworthiness of POC information, reported in a previously published review. A group of health care professionals and methodologists (the authors of this paper) defined criteria for the CAPOCI tool in an iterative process of discussion and pilot testing until consensus was reached. In the next step, all criteria were subject to content validation with a Delphi study. We invited an international panel of 10 experts to rate their agreement with the relevance and wording of the criteria and to give feedback. Consensus was reached when 70% of the experts agreed. When no consensus was reached, we reformulated the criteria based on the experts' comments for a next round of the Delphi study. This process was repeated until consensus was reached for each criterion. In a last step, the interrater reliability of the CAPOCI tool was calculated with a 2-tailed Kendall tau correlation coefficient to quantify the agreement between 2 users who piloted the CAPOCI tool on 5 POC resources. Two scoring systems were tested: a 3-point ordinal scale and a 7-point Likert scale.After validation, the CAPOCI tool was designed with 11 criteria that focused on methodological quality and author-related information. The criteria assess authorship, literature search, use of preappraised evidence, critical appraisal of evidence, expert opinions, peer review, timeliness and updating, conflict of interest, and commercial support. Interrater agreement showed substantial agreement between 2 users for scoring with the 3-point ordinal scale (τ=.621, P<.01) and scoring with the 7-point Likert scale (τ=.677, P<.01).The CAPOCI tool may support validation teams in the assessment of trustworthiness of POC resources. It may also provide guidance for producers of POC resources." @default.
• W3178683465 created "2021-07-19" @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5011139935 @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5017080192 @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5028039134 @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5029579175 @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5036521051 @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5046072499 @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5046293602 @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5062275470 @default.
• W3178683465 creator A5087607346 @default.
• W3178683465 date "2021-10-05" @default.
• W3178683465 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3178683465 title "A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study" @default.
• W3178683465 cites W1962543528 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W1962767594 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W1987350481 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W1992157430 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2014980529 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2029722237 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2073644162 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2080994524 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2082209838 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2088212219 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2094340711 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2106952837 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2108973014 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2123109647 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2126547764 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2150631166 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2189104558 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2270681624 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2461069230 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2756578555 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2963371006 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2969314631 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2981444738 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W2990498583 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W3082143525 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W3112339026 @default.
• W3178683465 cites W4234158071 @default.
• W3178683465 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/27174" @default.
• W3178683465 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8527381" @default.
• W3178683465 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34609314" @default.
• W3178683465 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3178683465 type Work @default.
• W3178683465 sameAs 3178683465 @default.
• W3178683465 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3178683465 countsByYear W31786834652023 @default.
• W3178683465 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5011139935 @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5017080192 @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5028039134 @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5029579175 @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5036521051 @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5046072499 @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5046293602 @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5062275470 @default.
• W3178683465 hasAuthorship W3178683465A5087607346 @default.
• W3178683465 hasBestOaLocation W31786834651 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C2779495148 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C60641444 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C111919701 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C121332964 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C138496976 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C154945302 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C15744967 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C158154518 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C160735492 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C162324750 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C163258240 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C17744445 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C19648533 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C199539241 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C2779473830 @default.
• W3178683465 hasConceptScore W3178683465C2779495148 @default.

• next