FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3179853224> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3179853224 endingPage "412" @default.
• W3179853224 startingPage "410" @default.
• W3179853224 abstract "https://www.videogie.org/cms/asset/c315b6ef-4fe4-4a21-b245-f7124d026a4e/mmc1.mp4Loading ...(mp4, 379.29 MB) Download video Video showing endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty performed after failed modified primary obesity surgery endoluminal procedure. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) or gastric plication is a recent, minimally invasive treatment in bariatric endoscopy. The basic mechanisms of action are gastric volume reduction and alteration of gastric peristalsis.1Abu Dayyeh B.K. Rajan E. Gostout C.J. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a potential endoscopic alternative to surgical sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of obesity.Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 78: 530-535Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar Currently, 3 devices are used in daily clinical practice: Apollo Overstitch (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Tex, USA), Endomina (Endo Tools Therapeutics, SA-ETT, Gosselies, Belgium), and an incisionless operating platform (USGI Medical, San Clemente, Calif, USA). They are used to perform the modified primary obesity surgery endoluminal (POSE-2) procedure. Of these, Endomina is used only in Europe. ESG seems to be safe and effective in selected patients, and effectiveness is similar for all of the mentioned devices.2Marincola G. Gallo C. Hassan C. et al.Erratum: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9: C1Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 3Huberty V, Boskoski I, Bove V, et al. Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty in addition to lifestyle modification: short-term efficacy in a controlled randomized trial. Gut. Epub 2020 Oct 28.Google Scholar, 4Espinós J.C. Turró R. Moragas G. et al.Gastrointestinal physiological changes and their relationship to weight loss following the POSE procedure.Obes Surg. 2016; 26: 1081-1089Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar, 5Lopez-Nava G. Asokkumar R. Turró Arau R. et al.Modified primary obesity surgery endoluminal (POSE-2) procedure for the treatment of obesity.VideoGIE. 2020; 5: 91-93Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 6Storm A.C. Abu Dayyeh B.K. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for obesity: defining the risk and reward after more than 1600 procedures.Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 1139-1140Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar Between these devices, ESG with Apollo Overstitch is the most explored. In case of failure of weight loss, redo ESG after primary ESG (both with Apollo Overstitch) has been proved to be safe and effective, with 100% of technical success and about 19% of total body weight loss within 1 year.7Boškoski I, Pontecorvi V, Gallo C, et al. Redo endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: technical aspects and short-term outcomes. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. Epub 2020 Jan 20.Google Scholar,8de Moura D.T.H. Barrichello Jr., S. de Moura E.G.H. et al.Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in the management of weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy.Endoscopy. 2020; 52: 202-210Crossref PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar To our knowledge, ESG with Apollo Overstitch after failed POSE-2 procedure has not yet been described. Here, we describe the clinical results and technical aspects of the first case of ESG with Apollo Overstitch after a previous POSE-2 procedure.5Lopez-Nava G. Asokkumar R. Turró Arau R. et al.Modified primary obesity surgery endoluminal (POSE-2) procedure for the treatment of obesity.VideoGIE. 2020; 5: 91-93Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar A 40-year-old female patient with obesity (body mass index [BMI] 36 kg/m2) with hypertension and dyslipidemia who had refused bariatric surgery underwent the POSE-2 procedure after multidisciplinary team evaluation. The POSE-2 procedure was done in June 2019. The patient lost 19 kg (21% of total body weight loss) in 1 year, with a BMI of 28.8 kg/m2. In November 2020, the patient lost her sense of satiety, and her BMI progressively increased to BMI 31.6 kg/m2. On gastroscopy, all of the stitches of the POSE-2 procedure were almost completely opened (Fig. 1). The patient underwent a new multidisciplinary team evaluation, and a redo procedure with Apollo Overstitch was indicated. The procedure (Video 1 available online at www.giejournal.org) was done with the standard Apollo Overstitch suturing device and a double-channel gastroscope (2TGIF-180, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), with CO2 inflation and endotracheal intubation and the patient in a supine position. The remnant stitches of the POSE-2 were left in place. Suturing started from the gastric incisura toward the fundus, leaving the fundus untouched. Sutures were placed on intact gastric mucosa; we took care not to suture over the previous stitches of the POSE-2 procedure. It is crucial to avoid the POSE-2 sutures to avoid needle engagement in those of the Overstitch device. The suture lines were straight whenever possible, starting from the anterior gastric wall, passing through the greater curvature, and ending at the posterior gastric wall (Fig. 2). A maximum of 4 bites was used7Boškoski I, Pontecorvi V, Gallo C, et al. Redo endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: technical aspects and short-term outcomes. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. Epub 2020 Jan 20.Google Scholar to avoid too much stirring of the stomach, which could lead to too much pressure on the gastric wall and eventually to gastric perforation. Adding too much pressure between the sutures should also be avoided to reduce the pressure on the stomach. In addition, it should be kept in mind that every bite induces an inflammatory reaction of the gastric serosa and generates adherences on the external gastric wall. Essentially, the difference in the redo ESG over POSE-2 is in the suture pattern. In the present case, up to 4 bites in a straight line were done per suture, whereas normally in an ESG up to 6 bites with a U pattern are performed. A total of 5 sutures were placed with 4 bites each. The last suture line was placed about 4 cm distal to the cardia. Mean operation time was 32 minutes. Using CO2 and avoiding overinsufflation is essential. Gentle and slow pulling of the sutures is recommended because this improves the surgeon's ability to assess of the generated tension. Finally, all liquid content in the stomach should be aspirated, especially if it contains blood; this will reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting. The final aspect of the gastric sleeve was similar to a primary ESG (Fig. 3A and B). No adverse events occurred, and the patient was discharged the next day. After 1 month, the patient lost 7.5 kg, for a BMI of 28.8 kg/m2, with no delayed adverse events and excellent sense of satiety. At 6 months, her BMI was 26.4 kg/m2, with excellent feeling of satiety. The patient started aerobic physical activity and maintained a good sense of satiety. ESG is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure after modified primary obesity surgery endoluminal procedure." @default.
• W3179853224 created "2021-07-19" @default.
• W3179853224 creator A5008811522 @default.
• W3179853224 creator A5041960235 @default.
• W3179853224 creator A5043890435 @default.
• W3179853224 creator A5072768069 @default.
• W3179853224 creator A5089492490 @default.
• W3179853224 date "2021-09-01" @default.
• W3179853224 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3179853224 title "Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is feasible after failed modified primary obesity surgery endoluminal procedure" @default.
• W3179853224 cites W1206384052 @default.
• W3179853224 cites W2017405923 @default.
• W3179853224 cites W2945151490 @default.
• W3179853224 cites W2999595073 @default.
• W3179853224 cites W3000616357 @default.
• W3179853224 cites W3002682764 @default.
• W3179853224 cites W3097257969 @default.
• W3179853224 cites W4231626530 @default.
• W3179853224 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2021.05.019" @default.
• W3179853224 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8431246" @default.
• W3179853224 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34527839" @default.
• W3179853224 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3179853224 type Work @default.
• W3179853224 sameAs 3179853224 @default.
• W3179853224 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3179853224 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3179853224 hasAuthorship W3179853224A5008811522 @default.
• W3179853224 hasAuthorship W3179853224A5041960235 @default.
• W3179853224 hasAuthorship W3179853224A5043890435 @default.
• W3179853224 hasAuthorship W3179853224A5072768069 @default.
• W3179853224 hasAuthorship W3179853224A5089492490 @default.
• W3179853224 hasBestOaLocation W31798532241 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C2778586554 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C2779303773 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C3019402062 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C3020583074 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C511355011 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C544821477 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C126322002 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C141071460 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C2778586554 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C2779303773 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C3019402062 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C3020583074 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C511355011 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C544821477 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C61434518 @default.
• W3179853224 hasConceptScore W3179853224C71924100 @default.
• W3179853224 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W3179853224 hasLocation W31798532241 @default.
• W3179853224 hasLocation W31798532242 @default.
• W3179853224 hasLocation W31798532243 @default.
• W3179853224 hasOpenAccess W3179853224 @default.
• W3179853224 hasPrimaryLocation W31798532241 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W2461261133 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W2585993824 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W2908873235 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W2978762870 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W2991836686 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W3150210154 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W4233740756 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W4238812012 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W4287831559 @default.
• W3179853224 hasRelatedWork W4317798534 @default.
• W3179853224 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W3179853224 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3179853224 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3179853224 magId "3179853224" @default.
• W3179853224 workType "article" @default.