Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W318131505> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 87 of
87
with 100 items per page.
- W318131505 startingPage "113" @default.
- W318131505 abstract "I want to thank my critics for their excellent comments. (1) Before I try to respond to them, let me say something about the project that I intend to be contributing to. In my book, I ask the question: which rights should be universal? The book is the first of two volumes that try to answer it. In the first volume, which is the only one that has been published so far, I focus on the big picture and outline, in general terms, a list of nine basic rights. I provide both consequentialist and non-consequentialist rationales for the rights on my list. In the second volume Human Rights and Human Well-Being (forthcoming), I explain why I favor the consequentialist rationale over the non-consequentialist rationale, I specify more precisely the contours of the basic rights, and I consider which other rights should be universal. One way of understanding my book is as an attempt to continue the Enlightenment project of identifying universal rights that all governments should guarantee for their people, but without the Enlightenment epistemology. The Declaration of Independence famously says: hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In my book, I discuss why the drafters claimed that those rights were self-evident, when, in retrospect, it is clear that their claims were not self-evident. To say that a proposition is self-evident is to assert that no one could reasonably disagree with it. At the time the Declaration of Independence was written, the prevailing model of justification for a belief was based on proof in mathematics, so I refer to it as the Proof Paradigm. Justification according to the Proof Paradigm required ruling out all reasonable disagreement. Of course, at the time during which the Declaration of Independence was written, there was lots of reasonable disagreement about universal human rights. We know that the Declaration's contents were not self-evident, not even to the drafters, because many of them held slaves and defended slavery. Furthermore, from our historical vantage point, we know that which rights governments should guarantee their people is not self-evident, because we can see how our understanding of them evolves over time. Locke, Kant, and Rousseau were the main philosophical advocates of universal rights for men (at least, white property-owners), but none of them extended those rights to women. The Enlightenment philosophers made some big mistakes. This is enough to show that there was something wrong with their epistemological paradigm, the Proof Paradigm. Because they thought they had a source of infallible moral knowledge, I say they were epistemically immodest. In my book, I emphasize the importance in moral inquiry of epistemic modesty, of acknowledging that we may be mistaken. However, many philosophers today would not stop with epistemic modesty. They would insist that there was also something wrong with the Enlightenment metaphysics--with the idea that there are fundamental moral principles that apply strictly universally--to all moral beings or all rational beings in all possible worlds. I call this metaphysical immodesty. For many philosophers, it seems obvious that if we give up the Enlightenment's epistemic immodesty, we will see that we must give up its metaphysical immodesty also. If we no longer claim to have a priori access to truths that hold in all possible worlds, then how could we possibly have any way of being justified in believing any moral principles to be universal in this strong sense? (2) In my book I build on the work of Mill, Rawls, and Habermas to outline an alternative to the Proof Paradigm as a model for reasonable moral belief, the Moral Discovery Paradigm. On the Proof Paradigm, reasoning is top-down, from moral principles to particular moral judgments. On the Moral Discovery Paradigm, reasoning is primarily bottom-up, from particular moral judgments about actual and hypothetical cases to the moral principles that best explain them. …" @default.
- W318131505 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W318131505 creator A5053416827 @default.
- W318131505 date "2007-01-01" @default.
- W318131505 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W318131505 title "The Universality of Human Rights: A Response" @default.
- W318131505 cites W148842283 @default.
- W318131505 cites W149610102 @default.
- W318131505 cites W1516748551 @default.
- W318131505 cites W1535803599 @default.
- W318131505 cites W1573145223 @default.
- W318131505 cites W1581870297 @default.
- W318131505 cites W1981364594 @default.
- W318131505 cites W1983699023 @default.
- W318131505 cites W2020445631 @default.
- W318131505 cites W2021695404 @default.
- W318131505 cites W2071294820 @default.
- W318131505 cites W2113232279 @default.
- W318131505 cites W2113893891 @default.
- W318131505 cites W2151075651 @default.
- W318131505 cites W2317453382 @default.
- W318131505 cites W2907433721 @default.
- W318131505 cites W3124647534 @default.
- W318131505 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W318131505 type Work @default.
- W318131505 sameAs 318131505 @default.
- W318131505 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W318131505 countsByYear W3181315052012 @default.
- W318131505 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W318131505 hasAuthorship W318131505A5053416827 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C183992945 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C2777745021 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C2778607876 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C2780326160 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W318131505 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C111472728 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C121332964 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C138885662 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C144024400 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C169437150 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C17744445 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C183992945 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C190253527 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C199539241 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C2777745021 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C2778607876 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C2780326160 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C62520636 @default.
- W318131505 hasConceptScore W318131505C94625758 @default.
- W318131505 hasLocation W3181315051 @default.
- W318131505 hasOpenAccess W318131505 @default.
- W318131505 hasPrimaryLocation W3181315051 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W140070761 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W1814912771 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W1990545102 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2017984631 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2021396885 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2043997195 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2079831284 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2134347843 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W232612319 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2332376285 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2333930855 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2402344717 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2476316456 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2485501489 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2525698029 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W286395683 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2904389223 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W3123239889 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2738300241 @default.
- W318131505 hasRelatedWork W2749800908 @default.
- W318131505 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W318131505 isParatext "false" @default.
- W318131505 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W318131505 magId "318131505" @default.
- W318131505 workType "article" @default.