FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3182871774> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3182871774 endingPage "2358" @default.
• W3182871774 startingPage "2340" @default.
• W3182871774 abstract "Teachers' readiness for technology integration depends also on their beliefs about the contribution of technology to teaching and learning, which influence their motivation for its adoption. Initial pre-service teacher education is critical in reducing the attitude-behaviour divide supporting technology acceptability, acceptance and use. Acceptance of interaction between human and robot is more complicated than human-computer interaction acceptance. Social robots are radical innovations, harder for potential users to accept in human social spaces than are incremental innovations. In 2019, a survey using a convenience sample of 121 first-year students was conducted to examine pre-service teachers' beliefs about social robot educational technology. It examined the following factors derived from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology adopted for social robots in education: Perceived social dimension, Intention to use, Perceived usability, Anxiety. Based on our findings, it seems there is a critical disjunction between researchers' efforts to equip social robots with human manners and social intelligence and participants' rejection of this technology precisely because it mimics being human. Further, we report that ICT familiarity as assessed using PISA's Information Communication Technology—ICT familiarity factors is related to robot acceptability. These findings need further examination to inform educational robotics design and Human-Robot Interaction research and teacher education and training. Practitioners notes What is already known about this topic In the age of robotic technology, teachers face requirements to prepare students for work and life with social robots. Social robots are tested for classroom integration. Teachers' readiness to implement robot lessons depends on their beliefs about social robotic technology's contribution to teaching. Research and development in the field of social robotics still tend to focus more frequently on technology applications rather than pedagogical issues and advancing teaching and learning. What this paper adds Participants refuse to accept the idea of social robot-based instruction. The identified belief pattern is based mainly on the perceived social dimension, intention to use, perceived usability and anxiety. Participants critically perceive the robot's social dimension. Some of PISA's ICT familiarity factors are related to robots acceptability factors. Implication for policy and/or practice The policy and practice need to address how social robots could be integrated into current teaching and learning practices and more importantly how could robotic technology facilitate innovative pedagogical models for effective and efficient learning. The introduction of social robots should follow instructional design requirements and not merely technological advancement. Teacher initial education has to provide social robotic learning environments for pre-service teachers to experiment and design." @default.
• W3182871774 created "2021-07-19" @default.
• W3182871774 creator A5002666373 @default.
• W3182871774 creator A5020641117 @default.
• W3182871774 creator A5032808598 @default.
• W3182871774 date "2021-07-03" @default.
• W3182871774 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3182871774 title "Are pre‐service teachers disinclined to utilise embodied humanoid social robots in the classroom?" @default.
• W3182871774 cites W131467608 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W1547123635 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W1687440363 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W1965002790 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W1965551836 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W1980126165 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W1996947053 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W1997714027 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2018732718 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2019161055 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2019522918 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2039265691 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2054950643 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2058513103 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2066384970 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2074236919 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2090393964 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2095899461 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2100379340 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2105335341 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2109135966 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2116591386 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2120040514 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2121918274 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2122670923 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2124717700 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2137099741 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2137577228 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2157446202 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2261178860 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2316134298 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2339843553 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2417897973 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2469993354 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2559647739 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2583621564 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2586052379 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2603920273 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2605153561 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2656803717 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2739380323 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2758417526 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2767719889 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2776198381 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2804119481 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2806862986 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2887260263 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2888089814 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2889357810 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2890673152 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2891763386 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2891780699 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2903503469 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2907761700 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2939248770 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2957494123 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2967183790 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2972300972 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2977593581 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2979569951 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2980398434 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2980433339 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2987517507 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W2994317614 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W3005862303 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W3021622632 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W3152187879 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W327632426 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W4206474262 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W4207052600 @default.
• W3182871774 cites W789348835 @default.
• W3182871774 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13144" @default.
• W3182871774 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3182871774 type Work @default.
• W3182871774 sameAs 3182871774 @default.
• W3182871774 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W3182871774 countsByYear W31828717742021 @default.
• W3182871774 countsByYear W31828717742022 @default.
• W3182871774 countsByYear W31828717742023 @default.
• W3182871774 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3182871774 hasAuthorship W3182871774A5002666373 @default.
• W3182871774 hasAuthorship W3182871774A5020641117 @default.
• W3182871774 hasAuthorship W3182871774A5032808598 @default.
• W3182871774 hasConcept C100609095 @default.
• W3182871774 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W3182871774 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3182871774 hasConcept C145460709 @default.
• W3182871774 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3182871774 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3182871774 hasConcept C162947575 @default.

• next