FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3183253065> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3183253065 endingPage "683" @default.
• W3183253065 startingPage "683" @default.
• W3183253065 abstract "Due to the intensification of the poultry sector, poultry manure is being produced in increasing quantities, and its on-site management is becoming a critical problem. Animal health problems can be solved by stricter the veterinary and environmental standards. The off-site coupled industrial chicken manure recycling technology (Hosoya compost tea) fundamentally affects the agricultural value of new organic-based products. Due to the limited information available on manure recycling technology-related microbiological changes, this was examined in this study. A pot experiment with a pepper test plant was set up, using two different soils (Arenosol, slightly humous Arenosol) and two different doses (irrigation once a week with 40 mL of compost tea: dose 1, D1; irrigation twice a week with 40 mL of compost tea: dose 2, D2) of compost tea. Compost tea raw materials, compost tea, and compost tea treated soils were tested. The products (granulated manure, compost tea) and their effects were characterized by the following parameters: aerobic bacterial count (log CFU/g), fluorescein diacetate activity (3′,6′-diacetylfluorescein, FDA, µg Fl/g soil), glucosidase enzyme activity (GlA; PNP/µmol/g), and identification of microorganisms in compost tea with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Furthermore, we aimed to investigate how the microbiological indicators tested, and the effect of compost tea on the tested plant, could be interpreted. Based on our results, the microbiological characteristics of the treated soils showed an increase in enzyme activity, in the case of FDA an increase +0.26 μg Fl/g soil at D1, while the GlA increased +1.28 PNP/µmol/g with slightly humous Arenosol soil and increased +2.44 PNP/µmol/g at D1; and the aerobic bacterial count increased +0.15 log CFU/g at D2, +0.35 log CFU/g with slightly humous Arenosol and +0.85 log CFU/g at W8. MALDI-TOF MS results showed that the dominant bacterial genera analyzed were Bacillus sp., Lysinibacillus sp., and Pseudomonas sp. Overall, the microbial inducers we investigated could be a good alternative for evaluating the effects of compost solutions in soil–plant systems. In both soil types, the total chlorophyll content of compost tea-treated pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) had increased as a result of compost tea. D1 is recommended for Arenosol and, D2 for slightly humous Arenosol soil." @default.
• W3183253065 created "2021-08-02" @default.
• W3183253065 creator A5034754548 @default.
• W3183253065 creator A5038035460 @default.
• W3183253065 creator A5045990373 @default.
• W3183253065 creator A5046098900 @default.
• W3183253065 creator A5058489444 @default.
• W3183253065 creator A5062784896 @default.
• W3183253065 creator A5086274306 @default.
• W3183253065 creator A5091714274 @default.
• W3183253065 date "2021-07-19" @default.
• W3183253065 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W3183253065 title "Microbiological Effectivity Evaluation of New Poultry Farming Organic Waste Recycling" @default.
• W3183253065 cites W1569563805 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W1579784956 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W1876792792 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W1971981494 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W1972821982 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2005276977 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2006102151 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2010551735 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2013311918 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2017813532 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2019159754 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2019779640 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2030527987 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2037150373 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2041689000 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2054393001 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2058548520 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2063612204 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2072804722 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2073259373 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2073677027 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2075306853 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2077424838 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2081553917 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2103707099 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2120123139 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2133903151 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2147829453 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2156740024 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2160000759 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2169324788 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2181923510 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2313611832 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2320485564 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2396316280 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2408723996 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2507003403 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2563248266 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2587092159 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2799856253 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2889067045 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2891799885 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2960002857 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2962917672 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2966336292 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2970541948 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W2995143616 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W3035958548 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W3117923222 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W3119586915 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W3132075313 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W3138746777 @default.
• W3183253065 cites W3156087223 @default.
• W3183253065 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070683" @default.
• W3183253065 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3183253065 type Work @default.
• W3183253065 sameAs 3183253065 @default.
• W3183253065 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3183253065 countsByYear W31832530652021 @default.
• W3183253065 countsByYear W31832530652022 @default.
• W3183253065 countsByYear W31832530652023 @default.
• W3183253065 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3183253065 hasAuthorship W3183253065A5034754548 @default.
• W3183253065 hasAuthorship W3183253065A5038035460 @default.
• W3183253065 hasAuthorship W3183253065A5045990373 @default.
• W3183253065 hasAuthorship W3183253065A5046098900 @default.
• W3183253065 hasAuthorship W3183253065A5058489444 @default.
• W3183253065 hasAuthorship W3183253065A5062784896 @default.
• W3183253065 hasAuthorship W3183253065A5086274306 @default.
• W3183253065 hasAuthorship W3183253065A5091714274 @default.
• W3183253065 hasBestOaLocation W31832530651 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C13080248 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C159390177 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C159750122 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C175605896 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C2780119549 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C2780289900 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C2780739461 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C33070731 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C38304854 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W3183253065 hasConcept C523546767 @default.

• next