Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3184235486> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 items per page.
- W3184235486 abstract "The major stakeholders, including states (at least, in the global North) and transnational corporations (TNCs), have radically changed their attitude to the idea of mandatory human rights due diligence in the last decade. By asking what is behind these good intentions, and whether the mandatory corporate human rights due diligence models enforced so far are effective or represent an exercise in shooting blanks, and by combining a legal positivistic perspective with studies on governance and the production of knowledge, this article contributes to the legal and socio-legal assessment of these changes.Assessing the effectiveness of mandatory corporate human rights due diligence, this article discusses the inherent or implied features of this regulatory tool which restrict its ability to serve as an instrument to protect human rights. A special focus is made on two main restrictions that are specific for human rights due diligence: the regulatory boundary revealed in the auxiliary character of due diligence and its limed ability to serve as a standard of conduct, and the epistemic boundary, deriving from the conflicting role of companies as the architects and executives of knowledge production. To a certain extent, the legislative process can counterbalance some of these restrictions by setting up the substantive, precise obligations of companies, and by creating mechanisms of control and remediation. However, the analysis of nine different instruments reveals that neither states, nor the EU have used the potential of the regulatory force." @default.
- W3184235486 created "2021-08-02" @default.
- W3184235486 creator A5026197315 @default.
- W3184235486 creator A5073844505 @default.
- W3184235486 date "2021-01-01" @default.
- W3184235486 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3184235486 title "Mandatory Corporate Human Rights Due Diligence Models: Shooting Blanks?" @default.
- W3184235486 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3849978" @default.
- W3184235486 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3184235486 type Work @default.
- W3184235486 sameAs 3184235486 @default.
- W3184235486 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3184235486 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3184235486 hasAuthorship W3184235486A5026197315 @default.
- W3184235486 hasAuthorship W3184235486A5073844505 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConcept C2781016034 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConceptScore W3184235486C144133560 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConceptScore W3184235486C162324750 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConceptScore W3184235486C169437150 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConceptScore W3184235486C17744445 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConceptScore W3184235486C190253527 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConceptScore W3184235486C199539241 @default.
- W3184235486 hasConceptScore W3184235486C2781016034 @default.
- W3184235486 hasLocation W31842354861 @default.
- W3184235486 hasOpenAccess W3184235486 @default.
- W3184235486 hasPrimaryLocation W31842354861 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W1606243667 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W2025918034 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W2086933954 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W2567817630 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W2733304570 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W3217268233 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W4206058166 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W4353044070 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W4376127677 @default.
- W3184235486 hasRelatedWork W2133217692 @default.
- W3184235486 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3184235486 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3184235486 magId "3184235486" @default.
- W3184235486 workType "article" @default.