FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3184389609> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3184389609 abstract "Investigations led for several years at Laxemar and Forsmark reveal the large heterogeneity of geological formations and associated fracturing. This project aims at reinforcing the statistical DFN modeling framework adapted to a site scale. This leads therefore to develop quantitative methods of characterization adapted to the nature of fracturing and data availability. We start with the hypothesis that the maximum likelihood DFN model is a power-law model with a density term depending on orientations. This is supported both by literature and specifically here by former analyses of the SKB data. This assumption is nevertheless thoroughly tested by analyzing the fracture trace and lineament maps. Fracture traces range roughly between 0.5 m and 10 m - i e the usual extension of the sample outcrops. Between the raw data and final data used to compute the fracture size distribution from which the size distribution model will arise, several steps are necessary, in order to correct data from finite-size, topographical and sampling effects. More precisely, a particular attention is paid to fracture segmentation status and fracture linkage consistent with the DFN model expected. The fracture scaling trend observed over both sites displays finally a shape parameter k{sub t} close to 1.2 with a density term (alpha{sub 2d}) between 1.4 and 1.8. Only two outcrops clearly display a different trend with k{sub t} close to 3 and a density term (alpha{sub 2d}) between 2 and 3.5. The fracture lineaments spread over the range between 100 meters and a few kilometers. When compared with fracture trace maps, these datasets are already interpreted and the linkage process developed previously has not to be done. Except for the subregional lineament map from Forsmark, lineaments display a clear power-law trend with a shape parameter k{sub t} equal to 3 and a density term between 2 and 4.5. The apparent variation in scaling exponent, from the outcrop scale (k{sub t} = 1.2) on one side, to the lineament scale (k{sub t} = 2) on the other, addresses the issue of the nature of the transition. We develop a new 'mechanistic' model that could help in modeling why and where this transition can occur. The transition between both regimes would occur for a fracture length of 1-10 m and even at a smaller scale for the few outcrops that follow the self-similar density model. A consequence for the disposal issue is that the model that is likely to apply in the 'blind' scale window between 10-100 m is the self-similar model as it is defined for large-scale lineaments. The self-similar model, as it is measured for some outcrops and most lineament maps, is definitely worth being investigated as a reference for scales above 1-10 m. In the rest of the report, we develop a methodology for incorporating uncertainty and variability into the DFN modeling. Fracturing properties arise from complex processes which produce an intrinsic variability; characterizing this variability as an admissible variation of model parameter or as the division of the site into subdomains with distinct DFN models is a critical point of the modeling effort. Moreover, the DFN model encompasses a part of uncertainty, due to data inherent uncertainties and sampling limits. Both effects must be quantified and incorporated into the DFN site model definition process. In that context, all available borehole data including recording of fracture intercept positions, pole orientation and relative uncertainties are used as the basis for the methodological development and further site model assessment. An elementary dataset contains a set of discrete fracture intercepts from which a parent orientation/density distribution can be computed. The elementary bricks of the site, from which these initial parent density distributions are computed, rely on the former Single Hole Interpretation division of the boreholes into sections whose local boundaries are expected to reflect - locally - geology and fracturing properties main characteristics. From that starting point we built Statistical Fracture Domains whose significance rely exclusively on fracturing statistics, not including explicitly the current Fracture Domains or closeness between one borehole section or the other. Theoretical developments are proposed in order to incorporate the orientation uncertainty and the fracturing variability into a resulting parent distribution density uncertainty. When applied to both sites, it comes that variability prevails in front of uncertainty, thus validating the good level of data accuracy. Moreover, this allows to define a possible range of variation around the mean values of densities. Finally a sorting algorithm is developed for providing, from the initial elementary bricks mentioned above, a division of a site into Statistical Fracture Domains whose internal variability is reduced." @default.
• W3184389609 created "2021-08-02" @default.
• W3184389609 creator A5009772135 @default.
• W3184389609 creator A5033313852 @default.
• W3184389609 creator A5060206535 @default.
• W3184389609 creator A5079971016 @default.
• W3184389609 creator A5086401982 @default.
• W3184389609 date "2009-11-15" @default.
• W3184389609 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3184389609 title "Statistical methodology for discrete fracture model - including fracture size, orientation uncertainty together with intensity uncertainty and variability" @default.
• W3184389609 cites W1513910506 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W1975661669 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W1984909515 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2004020960 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2013849755 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2045233237 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2051875053 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2056136638 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2057320839 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2060242648 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2070430073 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2141960836 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2172135884 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2505157809 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2950627632 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W3014765040 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W3118634470 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W3119057918 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W3162248178 @default.
• W3184389609 cites W2189460232 @default.
• W3184389609 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W3184389609 type Work @default.
• W3184389609 sameAs 3184389609 @default.
• W3184389609 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3184389609 countsByYear W31843896092013 @default.
• W3184389609 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3184389609 hasAuthorship W3184389609A5009772135 @default.
• W3184389609 hasAuthorship W3184389609A5033313852 @default.
• W3184389609 hasAuthorship W3184389609A5060206535 @default.
• W3184389609 hasAuthorship W3184389609A5079971016 @default.
• W3184389609 hasAuthorship W3184389609A5086401982 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C16345878 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C169212394 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C77928131 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C92596616 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConcept C99844830 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C105795698 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C114793014 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C127313418 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C159985019 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C16345878 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C165205528 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C169212394 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C187320778 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C192562407 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C204323151 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C205649164 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C2524010 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C2778755073 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C33923547 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C43369102 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C58640448 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C77928131 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C92596616 @default.
• W3184389609 hasConceptScore W3184389609C99844830 @default.
• W3184389609 hasLocation W31843896091 @default.
• W3184389609 hasOpenAccess W3184389609 @default.
• W3184389609 hasPrimaryLocation W31843896091 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W1614100188 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W1968858413 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W1986335547 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2034067582 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2035953721 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2047768060 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2092343442 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2106813515 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2148173413 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2163019298 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2185444145 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2188068372 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2211674889 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2283059580 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2317654120 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W2472144516 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W3095822202 @default.
• W3184389609 hasRelatedWork W319531627 @default.

• next