FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3184667797> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3184667797 endingPage "49" @default.
• W3184667797 startingPage "20" @default.
• W3184667797 abstract "Purpose Employee engagement has received a considerable amount of research attention over the last decade. However, most of the research has been on job or work engagement. Much less attention has been given to organization engagement, which is a distinct but related target of employee engagement. In this paper, we review the research on organization engagement and identify how it has been measured, its antecedents and consequences and how it compares to job engagement. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides a narrative review of 40 studies that have measured organization engagement. Most of these studies have been published in the last five years, and they come from 20 different countries. The majority of studies also measured job or work engagement. Findings Most studies used Saks' (2006) measure of organization engagement. Many antecedents have been found to be related to organization engagement; however, those most often studied and consistently related to organization engagement are organizational-related resources such as perceived organizational support (POS), justice perceptions, corporate social responsibility (CSR), organizational structural factors, organizational climate and HR practices. Organization engagement has been found to be positively related to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), job performance and organizational performance and negatively related to intention to quit. Organization engagement has also been found to partially or fully mediate the relationship between antecedents and consequences. In comparison to job engagement, organization engagement scores tend to be lower, and there are meaningful differences in the antecedents and consequences of organization engagement and job engagement. A number of studies found that organization engagement was more strongly related to several of the consequences than job engagement. Practical implications The results of this review indicate that organization engagement is as important if not more important than job engagement when it comes to its relationship to some of the consequences of employee engagement. Organizations should include a measure of organization engagement in employee surveys and focus on improving organization engagement by providing a supportive work environment, ensuring that employees have positive perceptions of justice, increasing CSR initiatives, providing a variety of human resources (HR) practices and improving organizational climate. Originality/value This paper provides the first comprehensive review of research on organization engagement and offers a new model of the antecedents and consequences of organization engagement and compares organization engagement to job engagement." @default.
• W3184667797 created "2021-08-02" @default.
• W3184667797 creator A5035413191 @default.
• W3184667797 creator A5065237220 @default.
• W3184667797 creator A5089235336 @default.
• W3184667797 date "2021-07-29" @default.
• W3184667797 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3184667797 title "Organization engagement: a review and comparison to job engagement" @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1490752629 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1509782331 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1510024343 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1637356433 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1902610065 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1923926731 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1970864063 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1980032978 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1982135085 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1989763926 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W1997885713 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2005126555 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2012371023 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2013007740 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2041090984 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2047976448 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2071710322 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2072544276 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2094182805 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2096075777 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2136001279 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2138597880 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2158591127 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2165024390 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2347179456 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2514517101 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2563747242 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2567423505 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2607738569 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2728333230 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2735050490 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2765280712 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2777700623 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2781803922 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2800339648 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2804928721 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2883041962 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2887646779 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2912484336 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2921406444 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2950037922 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W2974039243 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W3015297614 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W3046763544 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W3088001793 @default.
• W3184667797 cites W3102329489 @default.
• W3184667797 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-12-2020-0253" @default.
• W3184667797 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3184667797 type Work @default.
• W3184667797 sameAs 3184667797 @default.
• W3184667797 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W3184667797 countsByYear W31846677972022 @default.
• W3184667797 countsByYear W31846677972023 @default.
• W3184667797 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3184667797 hasAuthorship W3184667797A5035413191 @default.
• W3184667797 hasAuthorship W3184667797A5065237220 @default.
• W3184667797 hasAuthorship W3184667797A5089235336 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C126583095 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C141261163 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C174954385 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C185654502 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C205112559 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C2718322 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C2779359184 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C2781160688 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C83030740 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConcept C99753626 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C126583095 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C127413603 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C141261163 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C15744967 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C174954385 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C17744445 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C185654502 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C18762648 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C205112559 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C2718322 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C2779359184 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C2781160688 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C39549134 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C77805123 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C78519656 @default.
• W3184667797 hasConceptScore W3184667797C83030740 @default.

• next