Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3186072904> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- W3186072904 endingPage "32" @default.
- W3186072904 startingPage "17" @default.
- W3186072904 abstract "There are four classifications of hadith scholars measured by how skeptical they are of the authenticity of the hadith, namely Early Western Scepticism, Reaction Against Scepticism, Middle Ground, and Renewed Scepticism. Of the four classifications, Berg divides them into two groups, namely those who are skeptical and non-skeptical. In response to this, Harald Motzki specifically criticized Berg's classification. data source that used is based on the article The Question of Authenticity of Muslim Traditions Reconsidered: A Review Article by Harald Motzki as the primary source and the supporting articles for this article as a secondary source. Through the descriptive-analytical method, the writer will describe Harald Motzki's criticism of Herbert Berg's classification and provide an analysis of it, so that readers can understand the point of Harald Motzki's criticism and the reasons behind the criticism. With that method, it was found that Harald Motzki thought that if Berg's classification, both logically and epistemologically, was useless. This is based on three main criticisms: First, the unclear definition of the classification. Second, the error in capturing the meaning of the hadith scholars. Third, there is a bias in the skeptical group, so that the explanation for the non-skeptical group is not balanced." @default.
- W3186072904 created "2021-08-02" @default.
- W3186072904 creator A5005637065 @default.
- W3186072904 creator A5064683516 @default.
- W3186072904 date "2021-07-10" @default.
- W3186072904 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3186072904 title "KRITIK HARALD MOTZKI TERHADAP KLASIFIKASI MODEL PEMIKIRAN HADIS HERBERT BERG" @default.
- W3186072904 doi "https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v7i1.19177" @default.
- W3186072904 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3186072904 type Work @default.
- W3186072904 sameAs 3186072904 @default.
- W3186072904 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3186072904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3186072904 hasAuthorship W3186072904A5005637065 @default.
- W3186072904 hasAuthorship W3186072904A5064683516 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConcept C18296254 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConceptScore W3186072904C111472728 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConceptScore W3186072904C124952713 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConceptScore W3186072904C138885662 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConceptScore W3186072904C142362112 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConceptScore W3186072904C18296254 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConceptScore W3186072904C2780876879 @default.
- W3186072904 hasConceptScore W3186072904C7991579 @default.
- W3186072904 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3186072904 hasLocation W31860729041 @default.
- W3186072904 hasOpenAccess W3186072904 @default.
- W3186072904 hasPrimaryLocation W31860729041 @default.
- W3186072904 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W3186072904 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3186072904 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3186072904 magId "3186072904" @default.
- W3186072904 workType "article" @default.