FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3186165324> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3186165324 endingPage "145" @default.
• W3186165324 startingPage "114" @default.
• W3186165324 abstract "Background/Context: Several studies have investigated state political and economic factors that explain differences in levels of state appropriations for colleges and universities. Few studies have considered how stakeholder beliefs or taken-for-granted assumptions about various institutions may impact budgeting decisions for specific campuses. A gap in the literature remains in understanding how normative agreements about various institutional types—such as public flagship universities—may influence levels of state appropriations for these institutions. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: This study investigates how levels of state support for research universities might relate to their formal, informal, or even contested status as public flagship institutions. The research question guiding this study is: How might flagship identity relate to differences in levels of state appropriations for public research universities across states? Research Design: This multicase study examines differences in levels of state support for four flagship universities between 1984 and 2004. Case institutions were generated from an analysis of outlier institutions that received lower- or higher-than-predicted levels of appropriations during the two-decade period. Outliers analyzed for this study include the University of Massachusetts-Amherst and University of Virginia (lower-than-predicted support) and the University of Connecticut and the University of Maryland-College Park (higher-than-predicted support). Qualitative data were collected and analyzed to investigate disparities in state support among these four institutions. Findings/Results: This study found that a “flagship ideal” exists across the four cases, which provides meaning for stakeholders as they consider levels of state funding for these institutions. Idealized views of flagships provided advantages to some institutions and disadvantaged others in state budgeting processes during the study period. In addition, normative beliefs about the case institutions were mediated by state culture, politics, and powerful regional influences. Higher education governance structure was less important than cultural and political context in making sense of variations in state support across the institutions. Conclusions/Recommendations: The study suggests that flagship university leaders must be mindful about taken-for-granted assumptions held by key stakeholders and resource providers as they create appeals for state support. Across all institutional types, leaders must be attuned to the historical, cultural, economic, or political factors that shape understandings about their institutions. In addition, leaders must evaluate the influence of allies or foes in shaping the narrative about the institution’s unique identity and need for funding. Strategic leaders leverage their institutional identities and unique governing arrangements in ways that expand resource opportunities." @default.
• W3186165324 created "2021-08-02" @default.
• W3186165324 creator A5049927635 @default.
• W3186165324 date "2021-08-01" @default.
• W3186165324 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3186165324 title "The Organizational Ecology of State Support for Public Flagship Universities" @default.
• W3186165324 cites W1554491137 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W1603085242 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W1879291286 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W1965278510 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W1983121514 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W1990631505 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2000027842 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2019094433 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2033995043 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2037967274 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2065401570 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2084643653 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2103479011 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2105802002 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2110026818 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2125240035 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2135401317 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2152875371 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2156811743 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2161994447 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2482854954 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2482882625 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2490259420 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2594549579 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2607316424 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W2886233734 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W3086804857 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W3125349408 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W4248648239 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W4250751242 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W71641049 @default.
• W3186165324 cites W79229537 @default.
• W3186165324 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681211048631" @default.
• W3186165324 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3186165324 type Work @default.
• W3186165324 sameAs 3186165324 @default.
• W3186165324 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3186165324 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3186165324 hasAuthorship W3186165324A5049927635 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C31196326 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C11413529 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C120912362 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C144024400 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C151730666 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C17744445 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C199539241 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C201305675 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C2779343474 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C3116431 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C31196326 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C39549134 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C41008148 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C48103436 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C86803240 @default.
• W3186165324 hasConceptScore W3186165324C94625758 @default.
• W3186165324 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W3186165324 hasLocation W31861653241 @default.
• W3186165324 hasOpenAccess W3186165324 @default.
• W3186165324 hasPrimaryLocation W31861653241 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W11099579 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W15081006 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W1584686 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W16893752 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W2497491 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W6476835 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W724951 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W8054653 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W9499278 @default.
• W3186165324 hasRelatedWork W9686466 @default.
• W3186165324 hasVolume "123" @default.
• W3186165324 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3186165324 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3186165324 magId "3186165324" @default.
• W3186165324 workType "article" @default.