FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3188374871> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3188374871 endingPage "94" @default.
• W3188374871 startingPage "94" @default.
• W3188374871 abstract "The objective of this work is to study the impact of acquisition protocols on the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based dose calculation and to determinate its limits from image characteristics such as image quality, Hounsfield numbers consistency, and restrictive sizes of volume acquisition, compared to the CT imaging for the different anatomy localizations: head and neck (H&N), thorax, and pelvis.In this work, we used a routine on-board imaging CBCT of the XVI system (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). Dosimetric calculations performed on CT images require the knowledge of the Hounsfield unit-relative electron density (HU-ReD) calibration curve, which is determined for each imaging technology and must be adapted to the imaging acquisition parameters (filter/field of view). The accuracy of the dose calculation from CBCT images strongly depends on the quality of these images and also on the appropriate correspondence to the electronic densities, which will be used by the treatment planning system to simulate the dose distribution. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of the dose calculation for each protocol, as already pointed in many studies.As a result, the protocols that give better results in terms of dose calculation are F0S20 for the H&N region and F1M20 for the thoracic and pelvic regions, with an error <2% compared to results obtained with CT images. In addition, the dose distributions obtained with CT and CBCT imaging modalities were compared by two different methods. The first comparison was done by gamma index in three planes (sagittal, coronal, and transverse) with 2%; 2 mm criteria. The results showed good correspondence, with more than 95% of points passed the criteria. We also compared the target volume, the organs at risk (OARs), and the maximum and minimum doses for the three localizations (H&N, thorax, and pelvis) in CT and CBCT imaging modalities using a Rando phantom.The choice of the adequate CBCT acquisition protocol and the appropriate phantom to determine the HU-ReD calibration curve provides a better precision in the calculation of dose on CBCT images. This allows improving the results obtained when using the HU-ReD calibration method for dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy." @default.
• W3188374871 created "2021-08-16" @default.
• W3188374871 creator A5017882397 @default.
• W3188374871 creator A5018167273 @default.
• W3188374871 creator A5059103258 @default.
• W3188374871 creator A5064517627 @default.
• W3188374871 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W3188374871 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3188374871 title "Impact of acquisition protocols on accuracy of dose calculation based on xvi cone beam computed tomography" @default.
• W3188374871 cites W1730719179 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W1750932393 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W1966862986 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W1975319276 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2007638243 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2012073793 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2042239233 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2049394478 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2070158735 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2076761842 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2081974221 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2088953052 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2099501023 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2107733279 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2127364789 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2131019611 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2152852918 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2166018620 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2481020490 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2530701399 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2779698276 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W2917015424 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W3041301636 @default.
• W3188374871 cites W3046003413 @default.
• W3188374871 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_128_20" @default.
• W3188374871 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8415252" @default.
• W3188374871 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34566289" @default.
• W3188374871 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3188374871 type Work @default.
• W3188374871 sameAs 3188374871 @default.
• W3188374871 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3188374871 countsByYear W31883748712023 @default.
• W3188374871 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3188374871 hasAuthorship W3188374871A5017882397 @default.
• W3188374871 hasAuthorship W3188374871A5018167273 @default.
• W3188374871 hasAuthorship W3188374871A5059103258 @default.
• W3188374871 hasAuthorship W3188374871A5064517627 @default.
• W3188374871 hasBestOaLocation W31883748711 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C187954543 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C2779200277 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C115961682 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C120665830 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C121332964 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C126838900 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C154945302 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C187954543 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C2779200277 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C2779813781 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C2989005 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C41008148 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C544519230 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C55020928 @default.
• W3188374871 hasConceptScore W3188374871C71924100 @default.
• W3188374871 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3188374871 hasLocation W31883748711 @default.
• W3188374871 hasLocation W31883748712 @default.
• W3188374871 hasLocation W31883748713 @default.
• W3188374871 hasLocation W31883748714 @default.
• W3188374871 hasOpenAccess W3188374871 @default.
• W3188374871 hasPrimaryLocation W31883748711 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W1642012722 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W1967263816 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W1982789351 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W2049394478 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W2151127213 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W2161723475 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W2256049797 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W2287344295 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W2512417455 @default.
• W3188374871 hasRelatedWork W2970627089 @default.
• W3188374871 hasVolume "46" @default.
• W3188374871 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3188374871 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3188374871 magId "3188374871" @default.
• W3188374871 workType "article" @default.