FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3189884055> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3189884055 endingPage "90" @default.
• W3189884055 startingPage "72" @default.
• W3189884055 abstract "Background and ObjectiveOver the past 100 years, the country has lost about 90 percent of its per capita renewable water. About 90% of the country's renewable water resources are allocated to the agricultural sector. With the increase in the area of pistachio orchards and the increase in demand for water on the one hand and the limited water resources in the region, on the other hand, the imbalance between supply and demand for water is sharply increasing. In this regard, the most important step to prevent water loss is the uniform distribution of water on the field, optimal at each stage of growth. About 99% of the water absorbed by the plant is used for evapotranspiration. Therefore, studying this phenomenon can play an important role in determining the water needs of plants. It is difficult to measure the actual evapotranspiration outside the laboratory. Many experimental methods have been developed to estimate actual and potential evapotranspiration using meteorological and climatic data. But most of these methods are only able to estimate potential evapotranspiration and do not estimate the actual amount of it.  In contrast, remote sensing methods have been developed that are a good solution for estimating the actual evapotranspiration. Satellite imagery with global coverage and repetitive Acquisition has made it possible to monitor evapotranspiration at the field level and during plant growth. Various studies have been conducted to estimate the actual evapotranspiration of agricultural areas using satellite images, which indicate the acceptable accuracy of these methods. However, most of this research is related to agricultural fields and no significant research has been done to estimate evapotranspiration at the orchards. Vegetation at the farms is uniform and homogeneous compared to orchards, so the estimation of vegetation index, which is one of the inputs of the SEBAL model in orchards is more difficult than agricultural fields, which can affect the final accuracy. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to estimate the amount of evapotranspiration in the pistachio orchard using the SEBAL algorithm and evaluate the accuracy of estimation. Also, this research has beenMaterials and Methods The present research has been carried out in pistachio orchards in Zarandieh city of Markazi province. The gardens had three different irrigation systems including flood irrigation systems, surface, and subsurface drip irrigation systems. Actual evapotranspiration is estimated using water balance and SEBAL algorithm. Meteorological data from Imam Airport Synoptic Station and Landsat8 satellite imagery has been used to estimate evapotranspiration using the SEBAL algorithm. Actual evapotranspiration is estimated at satellite overpass times during the growing season. To select hot and cold pixels in the SEBAL algorithm, the semi-automatic method proposed by Oldmo is used, which minimizes user participation in the selection of hot and cold pixels. To evaluate the accuracy of evapotranspiration estimation, the information of soil moisture sensors in the orchard has been used. 28 sensors measure soil moisture in different parts of the orchard. Using the soil moisture values, the actual evapotranspiration was estimated using the water balance method and used as a reference value.Results and Discussion A comparison of the results of the SEBAL algorithm and water balance method showed that the SEBAl algorithm was able to estimate the actual evapotranspiration in different parts of the orchard with an RMS error of 0.57. In addition, the correlation between the values estimated by the two methods was equal to 0.82, which indicates the appropriate capability of the SEBAL algorithm in estimating evapotranspiration values. The correlation between the actual evapotranspiration estimated from the SEBAL model and the reference evapotranspiration is 0.76. In addition, in the research, changes in the evapotranspiration in different parts of the garden and also gardens with different irrigation systems including flood, surface, and subsurface drips have been investigated. The results show that the orchard with subsurface irrigation had the lowest average of evapotranspiration on different dates. Considering that evapotranspiration is equal to the sum of evaporation from the soil surface and transpiration from the plant, this decrease can be attributed to the decrease in evaporation from the soil surface. In addition, evapotranspiration heterogeneity can be observed in all parts of orchards with the same irrigation system on all dates. For example, in the orchard with a flood irrigation system, parts of the garden show low evapotranspiration, which can be due to the lack of smoothing of the surface and lack of proper moisture in these areas. Obviously, the same amount of moisture accumulates in other parts of the garden and is inaccessible through deep percolation. This uneven distribution is also observed in the garden with a surface drip irrigation system. For example, the middle part of the garden with surface drip irrigation always shows a higher amount of evapotranspiration, which can indicate the loss of water in this part, due to the miss-operation of the dripper. To evaluate the difference in evapotranspiration in different irrigation systems, the average, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation values of evapotranspiration in orchards related to three different irrigation systems have been calculated. The results showed that in all dates, the ranges and standard deviation of evapotranspiration in the flood irrigation system were higher than in other systems, which indicates the lack of uniform irrigation in the orchard. Also, on all dates, the average amount of evapotranspiration in the orchard with a surface drip irrigation system has been more than flood irrigation system. Vegetation in orchards with drip irrigation systems (surface and subsurface) was denser compared to the flood irrigation systems.Conclusion In this study, the actual evapotranspiration of pistachio orchards has been estimated using satellite imagery and the SEBAL algorithm. The results of the study indicate the appropriate accuracy of the SEBAL algorithm in estimating the actual evapotranspiration of the orchards. Compared with the water balance method, the correlation coefficient was 0.82 and the root means the square error was 0.57. In addition, comparing the moisture situation in different parts of the orchard and in orchards with different irrigation systems has shown that by estimating the actual evapotranspiration using satellite imagery, appropriate information can be obtained on how to distribute moisture in the garden. This information provides valuable information on the optimal management of water resources and increases irrigation efficiency. Other results of this research include the significant difference between surface and subsurface drip irrigation methods. The results show that using subsurface irrigation methods can effectively reduce irrigation water loss due to evaporation from the soil surface. The results show that in areas where there is no access to information from soil moisture sensors or direct measurements of evapotranspiration, the use of the SEBAL algorithm and remote sensing methods can provide appropriate information for optimal water management." @default.
• W3189884055 created "2021-08-16" @default.
• W3189884055 creator A5034036239 @default.
• W3189884055 date "2021-06-22" @default.
• W3189884055 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3189884055 title "Estimation of actual evapotranspiration in pistachio orchards using SEBAL algorithm in three irrigation system" @default.
• W3189884055 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3189884055 type Work @default.
• W3189884055 sameAs 3189884055 @default.
• W3189884055 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3189884055 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3189884055 hasAuthorship W3189884055A5034036239 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C176783924 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C62649853 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConcept C88862950 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C11413529 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C176783924 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C18903297 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C205649164 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C33923547 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C39432304 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C41008148 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C62649853 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C6557445 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C86803240 @default.
• W3189884055 hasConceptScore W3189884055C88862950 @default.
• W3189884055 hasIssue "243" @default.
• W3189884055 hasLocation W31898840551 @default.
• W3189884055 hasOpenAccess W3189884055 @default.
• W3189884055 hasPrimaryLocation W31898840551 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W1603328666 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W176695133 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2017275096 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2149946514 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2185809099 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2328757449 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2377472202 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2379874013 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2810559460 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2883607744 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2885380016 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2949663102 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W2995532618 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W3019859393 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W3040295477 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W3048693357 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W3095175570 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W3126099649 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W3203401221 @default.
• W3189884055 hasRelatedWork W3018896642 @default.
• W3189884055 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W3189884055 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3189884055 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3189884055 magId "3189884055" @default.
• W3189884055 workType "article" @default.