FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3190099608> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3190099608 endingPage "1720" @default.
• W3190099608 startingPage "1707" @default.
• W3190099608 abstract "The direct anterior approach (DAA) are attracting increasing attention from orthopedic arthroplasty surgeons, due to the less blood loss, mild soft tissue invasion, rapid rehabilitation and shorter length of stay. However, the longer learning curve in DAA can give rise to several complications, such as intraoperative femoral fracture, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, wound-healing problem, premature revision and so on. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the rate of postoperative orthopedic complications between the DAA and the lateral approach (LA). All studies involving the comparison of postoperative orthopedic complications after THA between the DAA and LA group were searched in 7 databases prior to October 2020. The odds ratio (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each outcome was calculated by using the RevMan 5.3. The methodological bias of included studies was evaluated and the potential heterogeneity sources were analyzed. Thirteen comparative studies including a total of 24853 hips (9575 hips in the DAA group and 15278 hips in the LA group) were eligible for this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection [2.59% vs 2.14% (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.59-1.61, P = 0.93)], heterotopic ossification [12.16% vs 26.47% (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.20-1.07, P = 0.07)] and reoperation [2.70% and 2.11% respectively (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.68-1.26, P = 0.64)] between the DAA and LA groups. Although a lower rate in prosthesis malposition [36.19% vs 54.86% (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.35-0.73, P = 0.0003)], leg length discrepancy [1.87% vs 2.37% (OR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.30-4.25, P = 0.005)] and Trendelenburg gait [1.68% vs 4.78% (OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.13-0.65, P = 0.003)] was observed in the DAA group, a higher rate in dislocation [0.77% vs 0.18% (OR = 3.73; 95% CI: 2.35-5.94, P< 0.00001)], periprosthetic fracture [1.05% vs 0.41% (OR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.58-3.58, P< 0.0001)], prosthesis loosening [0.61% vs 0.37% (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.05-2.62, P = 0.03)] and nerve injury [0.95% vs 0% (OR = 7.12; 95% CI: 1.66-30.48, P = 0.008)] was found in the DAA group. This meta-analysis demonstrated several evidences indicating that the DAA exhibited the advantages in the accurate prosthesis placement and less damage of surrounding hip musculature. However, a higher rate in dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, prosthesis loosening and nerve injury in the DAA group should be paid more attention, due to the limited exposure and a longer learning curve, compared to the LA." @default.
• W3190099608 created "2021-08-16" @default.
• W3190099608 creator A5023546935 @default.
• W3190099608 creator A5048875079 @default.
• W3190099608 creator A5065408959 @default.
• W3190099608 creator A5073163963 @default.
• W3190099608 date "2021-08-01" @default.
• W3190099608 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3190099608 title "Comparisons between Direct Anterior Approach and Lateral Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Postoperative Orthopaedic Complications: <i>A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</i>" @default.
• W3190099608 cites W1861063639 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W1940606633 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W1984615481 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W1987650344 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W1990467236 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2010367405 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2012354506 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2013063633 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2014237761 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2014346654 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2015381986 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2024659120 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2026337627 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2028897944 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2030079148 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2039068838 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2042467580 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2047111419 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2053194504 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2077095697 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2081458645 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2114151227 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2116475791 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2120738822 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2131272508 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2138610968 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2165878134 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2186243241 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2288322902 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2303361104 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2321290461 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2324628764 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2338719012 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2341127181 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2412170668 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2413522415 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2468996569 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2498719422 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2530502281 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2572099110 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2576527788 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2616690241 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2620011714 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2760592359 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2805016622 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2806897909 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2809677057 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2889153199 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2901768424 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2916578313 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2936440240 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2940870366 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2947614267 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W2955446507 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W3087284872 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W4245500710 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W580370979 @default.
• W3190099608 cites W599111177 @default.
• W3190099608 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13101" @default.
• W3190099608 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8523754" @default.
• W3190099608 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34351056" @default.
• W3190099608 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3190099608 type Work @default.
• W3190099608 sameAs 3190099608 @default.
• W3190099608 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W3190099608 countsByYear W31900996082022 @default.
• W3190099608 countsByYear W31900996082023 @default.
• W3190099608 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3190099608 hasAuthorship W3190099608A5023546935 @default.
• W3190099608 hasAuthorship W3190099608A5048875079 @default.
• W3190099608 hasAuthorship W3190099608A5065408959 @default.
• W3190099608 hasAuthorship W3190099608A5073163963 @default.
• W3190099608 hasBestOaLocation W31900996081 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C136948725 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C2776211809 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C2780650075 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C43893838 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3190099608 hasConceptScore W3190099608C126322002 @default.

• next