FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3190267675> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3190267675 endingPage "577" @default.
• W3190267675 startingPage "570" @default.
• W3190267675 abstract "Objective Although there is some research on women’s choice of birthplace, most of this research has been conducted overseas. This study explored factors influencing the decision to use public or private maternity services within regional Australia. Methods This cross-sectional study consisted of a community-based, anonymous, online questionnaire focused on factors influencing a woman’s choice of birth location and included adult females who had given birth in the past 2 years within two regional areas. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse demographic characteristics and factors influencing decisions regarding birthplace. Pearson’s Chi-squared test was used to compare public and private births for multiple variables. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio for each potential factor based on whether participants with private health insurance (PHI) elected to birth in the public or private regional hospitals. Open coding was used to group responses to open ended questions into themes. Results Data from 510 questionnaires were analysed. The three most frequently reported factors influencing a woman’s decision about birthplace were financial reasons, the ability to choose their doctor and not having PHI. Women with PHI who opted for birth in the public system were almost four-fold more likely to select access to intensive care services and 2.6-fold more likely to select a preference for a low-intervention birth as one of their top five most influential factors. The results highlight that women want access to midwifery continuity of care. Conclusion This study provides insights into the factors influencing a woman’s complex decision about where and with whom to birth and how health insurance affects that decision, an area where there is a paucity of peer-reviewed literature. This research highlights the importance of being able to choose one’s doctor and the desire for access to midwife-led models of care, and provides evidence to advocate for improved access to additional models of care in the private sector. What is already known? The viability of regional private maternity hospitals is in question because, once the birth rate goes below a certain threshold, providing private obstetric service becomes unviable. Closure of regional private hospitals means less choice in regional areas. Minimal information is available about the factors influencing a woman with PHI to give birth in the public system, and much of the evidence is anecdotal. What does this paper add? This study provides insight into how PHI status and other factors influence a woman’s decision to birth in the public versus private sector, an area where there is a paucity of peer-reviewed literature. It also highlights a desire from women for access to midwifery continuity of care in the private system. What are the implications for practitioners? This research provides evidence to advocate for improved access to additional models of care, especially for midwifery-led care in the private sector." @default.
• W3190267675 created "2021-08-16" @default.
• W3190267675 creator A5013315506 @default.
• W3190267675 creator A5035541735 @default.
• W3190267675 creator A5038097269 @default.
• W3190267675 creator A5046895338 @default.
• W3190267675 date "2021-08-10" @default.
• W3190267675 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W3190267675 title "Birthing in regional Australia: women’s decision making surrounding birthplace" @default.
• W3190267675 cites W1856449001 @default.
• W3190267675 cites W1973264525 @default.
• W3190267675 cites W2019890261 @default.
• W3190267675 cites W2531089417 @default.
• W3190267675 cites W2586769482 @default.
• W3190267675 cites W2606883875 @default.
• W3190267675 cites W2782826053 @default.
• W3190267675 cites W2990089709 @default.
• W3190267675 cites W4296980855 @default.
• W3190267675 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/ah21067" @default.
• W3190267675 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34370966" @default.
• W3190267675 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3190267675 type Work @default.
• W3190267675 sameAs 3190267675 @default.
• W3190267675 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3190267675 countsByYear W31902676752023 @default.
• W3190267675 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3190267675 hasAuthorship W3190267675A5013315506 @default.
• W3190267675 hasAuthorship W3190267675A5035541735 @default.
• W3190267675 hasAuthorship W3190267675A5038097269 @default.
• W3190267675 hasAuthorship W3190267675A5046895338 @default.
• W3190267675 hasBestOaLocation W31902676752 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C2779271867 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C105795698 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C126322002 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C138816342 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C143095724 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C144024400 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C149923435 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C151956035 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C159110408 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C160735492 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C17744445 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C199539241 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C27415008 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C2779271867 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C2908647359 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C33923547 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C39896193 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C512399662 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C71924100 @default.
• W3190267675 hasConceptScore W3190267675C99454951 @default.
• W3190267675 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3190267675 hasLocation W31902676751 @default.
• W3190267675 hasLocation W31902676752 @default.
• W3190267675 hasOpenAccess W3190267675 @default.
• W3190267675 hasPrimaryLocation W31902676751 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W1520846789 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W1529420443 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W1604293003 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W1604849300 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W1979850356 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W2500600905 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W2766061861 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W3005040438 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W3124750890 @default.
• W3190267675 hasRelatedWork W3186119517 @default.
• W3190267675 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W3190267675 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3190267675 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3190267675 magId "3190267675" @default.
• W3190267675 workType "article" @default.