FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W319064160> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W319064160 endingPage "1997" @default.
• W319064160 startingPage "1945" @default.
• W319064160 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION The confluence of religion and sexual abuse has become a matter of substantial debate. Everyone agrees that sexual abuse by a member of the clergy is wrong. The arguments erupt when we begin to tease out when sex is abusive and what to do about it, particularly what the law should do about it. For those committed to the preservation of religious autonomy in the United States, the unfettered tort liability of religious institutions is not a comfortable prospect, although the train seems to have left the station headed in that direction.1 Finding a compromise between using social and state authority to address the admitted evil of the abuse of power-particularly as it rains down primarily on women and children-and preserving of religious freedom is a daunting task. Professors Ira C. Lupu and Robert W. Tuttle's paper, Sexual Misconduct and Ecclesiastical Immunity? effectively traces the history and status of the ecclesiastical immunity doctrine and then attempts to provide a framework for understanding a widely divergent and inconsistent body of case law arising from claims of sexual abuse by clergy. They categorize cases by their doctrinal premises, providing a basis for a clearer and more consistent understanding of existing law. Professors Lupu and Tuttle then provide a normative argument for preserving some form of ecclesiastical immunity from the onslaught of unrestricted tort liability,3 but only in highly particularized contexts.4 Professors Lupu and Tuttle assert that the free exercise approach to ecclesiastical immunity is a dead end.5 They resort instead to the Establishment Clause and the notion that with Separationism government is constitutionally disabled from addressing or asserting control over ultimate questions.6 Based on this principle, they propose, first, to shield the individual priest/perpetrator when the abuse involves adult victim, is not a crime, and does not arise during a secular7 or secular-like8 counseling relationship. With respect to individual liability, Professors Lupu and Tuttle argue that, when claims reach beyond offending clergymen9 to the sponsoring organization, such claims cannot help but touch the institutional arrangements and theological understandings that inform the structure of faith communities and their leadership,10 since churches will feel the pressure to internalize state-imposed changes in organizational structure11 and will ultimately be forced to rearrange[] . . . structure, policy or practice.12 Professors Lupu and Tuttle then offer suggestions for the protection of churches and supervisors, including primarily a proposal to limit liability for negligent hiring, training, and supervising to cases in which the defendant had actual malice, as that standard has developed in the freedom of the press cases.13 I ally myself with Professors Lupu and Tuttle on many fronts. I am sympathetic to the concerns raised in Sexual Misconduct regarding the risks to churches, and I endorse Professors Lupu and Tuttle's stated objective of finding an optimal arrangement [that will] balance the concerns of the tort system ... on one hand, with the constitutional concerns regarding structural autonomy of religious institutions, on the other.14 I also accept, for purposes of this Article, Professors Lupu and Tuttle's position that the Establishment Clause, for the reasons given in Sexual Misconduct, provides doctrinal support for at least some protections to religious organizations from the consequences of tort liability. I assume, for purposes of this response, that adult victims15 are almost exclusively female.16 Finally, I accept Professors Lupu and Tuttle's notion that standards drawn from the law of libel can provide a structure for reconciling tort law and the constitutional interests of religions in the context of liability for the wrongful hiring, training, and supervising of clergy.17 Beyond these points of consensus, however, I fear that the legal arrangement18 offered by Professors Lupu and Tuttle provides insufficient account of the distinctive constitutional place of religious institutions. …" @default.
• W319064160 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W319064160 creator A5053777268 @default.
• W319064160 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W319064160 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W319064160 title "An Itty· Bitty Immunity and Its Consequences for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter·day Saints: A Response to Professors Lupu and Tuttle" @default.
• W319064160 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W319064160 type Work @default.
• W319064160 sameAs 319064160 @default.
• W319064160 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W319064160 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W319064160 hasAuthorship W319064160A5053777268 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C200635333 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C2777834853 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C2777866547 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C2780587575 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C2992354236 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W319064160 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C11413529 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C121332964 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C144024400 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C163258240 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C17744445 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C185592680 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C190385971 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C199539241 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C200635333 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C2776211767 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C2777834853 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C2777866547 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C2780587575 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C2992354236 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C3017944768 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C41008148 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C48103436 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C55493867 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C62520636 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C65414064 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C71924100 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C98184364 @default.
• W319064160 hasConceptScore W319064160C99454951 @default.
• W319064160 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W319064160 hasLocation W3190641601 @default.
• W319064160 hasOpenAccess W319064160 @default.
• W319064160 hasPrimaryLocation W3190641601 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W1483138477 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W1520955852 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W1550574770 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W1583862182 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W1850503180 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W190358930 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W2119436965 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W2160750173 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W2184752157 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W2232551521 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W2254717607 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W2255455505 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W2465484445 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W2527679126 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W3123139226 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W3123967504 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W3125467920 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W83819533 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W311510419 @default.
• W319064160 hasRelatedWork W3126011755 @default.
• W319064160 hasVolume "2004" @default.
• W319064160 isParatext "false" @default.
• W319064160 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W319064160 magId "319064160" @default.
• W319064160 workType "article" @default.