FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3194611897> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3194611897 endingPage "18" @default.
• W3194611897 startingPage "3" @default.
• W3194611897 abstract "Social enterprise is a new kind of hybrid organization that integrates social and economic logics, which has made a big contribution to solving complicated social problems. Therefore, it is regarded as a power of social governance. However, some scholars indicate that it is difficult for the social enterprise to integrate different institutional logics effectively. The institutional logics coexisting within the same organization will result in difficulties in the commercial operation of social issues and leading to inefficient social governance—“social enterprise failure”. Hence, is the social enterprise a useful approach for social governance, or has it really failed? This article intends to respond to this argument.Given that the theory of social enterprise failure is taken from Benefit Corporation: A Desirable Organizational Paradigm for CSR Practice, this article firstly interprets the means of social enterprise failure, its inference logic and substitutive approach from that paper; secondly, this article diagnoses whether the social enterprise has failed through combining theories of typology and multiple institutional logics; finally, this article puts forward some suggestions to make a better understanding on the social enterprise and its social governance value.The conclusion shows that social enterprise failure is a misjudgment. According to the failure theory, the social enterprise is a kind of hybrid organization dominated by social logic, which will lead to poor social governance effectiveness. In order to solve the low efficiency of social governance, the failure theory points out B Corporation as the substitutive approach because of its balanced institutional logic arrangement. There are two categories of misunderstanding in this theory. First, the starting point （what is the social enterprise） of inferencing social enterprise failure is flawed. In fact, the logic arrangement of mixed system of the social enterprise is more diversified than the failure theory. Second, there are some logical flaws in the substitutive approach of social enterprise failure. The failure theory adopts the way of “one part instead of the whole”, that is, a certain type of social enterprise with low degree of hybridity and low social governance effectiveness replaces the social enterprise population to demonstrate that B Corporation is a more desirable subject of social governance, but the similarities between the social enterprise and B Corporation are ignored.To better reveal the social governance value of social enterprises, this article suggests that: （1） On academic research, we need to take actions to improve social enterprise paradigm establishment, especially pay attention to the social governance processes and consequences of social enterprises. （2） In practice, social problems can be solved by social enterprises through different forms, such as organization, organizational behavior, co-production, and so on.The contributions are as follows: First, this article provides a lens to make a better understanding of social enterprises from dynamic and multiple perspectives. Second, some research suggestions are put forward to improve the social governance value of social enterprises. Third, the confusion among social enterprise, B Corporation and CSR is clarified to some extent through this article’s framework, and the forms of social enterprises participating in social governance are diversified." @default.
• W3194611897 created "2021-08-30" @default.
• W3194611897 creator A5059141692 @default.
• W3194611897 date "2021-08-20" @default.
• W3194611897 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3194611897 title "Has the Social Enterprise Failed" @default.
• W3194611897 doi "https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20210218.401" @default.
• W3194611897 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3194611897 type Work @default.
• W3194611897 sameAs 3194611897 @default.
• W3194611897 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3194611897 countsByYear W31946118972022 @default.
• W3194611897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3194611897 hasAuthorship W3194611897A5059141692 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C130064352 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C2778348171 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C2994204036 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C535567245 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C95389739 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C10138342 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C130064352 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C144024400 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C144133560 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C17744445 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C185592680 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C199539241 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C2778348171 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C2994204036 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C36289849 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C39389867 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C39549134 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C535567245 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C55493867 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C94625758 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C95389739 @default.
• W3194611897 hasConceptScore W3194611897C98184364 @default.
• W3194611897 hasIssue "08" @default.
• W3194611897 hasLocation W31946118971 @default.
• W3194611897 hasOpenAccess W3194611897 @default.
• W3194611897 hasPrimaryLocation W31946118971 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W1503522575 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W1573977145 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W1790562550 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W1973541650 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W1990038612 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2048464846 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2134570057 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2182534761 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2339482033 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2342363649 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2387300380 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2511324741 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2725729417 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2890241875 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W2946536016 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W3004845052 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W3028481605 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W3096075743 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W3135534314 @default.
• W3194611897 hasRelatedWork W616032622 @default.
• W3194611897 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W3194611897 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3194611897 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3194611897 magId "3194611897" @default.
• W3194611897 workType "article" @default.