FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3195093025> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3195093025 abstract "Comparar las medidas de presión intraocular (PIO) obtenidas con el tonómetro de rebote iCare 200 (IC200) con las obtenidas mediante la versión portátil del tonómetro de aplanación Goldmann, Perkins (GAT) en pacientes con glaucoma congénito primario (GCP) y en sujetos sanos.Se incluyeron 42 sujetos sanos (G1) y 40 pacientes con GCP (G2). Se incluyó un ojo por paciente. Se recogieron las variables clínicas de interés: sexo, edad, grosor corneal central (GCC) y se midió la PIO mediante los tonómetros IC200 y GAT en el mismo orden, en consulta.Se estudió la concordancia entre tonómetros mediante el coeficiente de correlación intraclase y el gráfico de Bland Altman. La influencia de las variables se analizó mediante test de regresión lineal.Las medias de PIO obtenidas mediante IC200 y GAT fueron: G1 = 15,91 (2,57) vs. 15,06 (2,12) mm Hg (diferencia de medias, DM = 0,84 (0,50) mm Hg; p = 0,101) y en el G2 = 20,10 (6,37) vs.19,12 (5,62) (DM = 0,98 [1,36]; p = 0,474).Se observó excelente concordancia entre IC200/GAT en ambos los grupos (coeficiente de correlación intraclase = G1: 0,875 [IC 95%: 0,768-0,933; p < 0,001]; G2: 0,924 [IC 95% 0,852-0,961; p < 0,001]), así como la influencia del GCC en la diferencia entre tonómetros en el G1 (B = 0,021; IC 95%: 0,005-0,037; p = 0,008), sin significación estadística en el G2.Se ha encontrado una excelente concordancia entre ambos tonómetros, IC200 y GAT tanto en sujetos sanos como en pacientes con GCP, con una tendencia a la sobreestimación de la PIO de IC200 sobre Perkins. No se ha demostrado la influencia del GCC en los pacientes con GCP.To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Icare 200™ (IC200) rebound tonometer and the hand-held version of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (Perkins™ tonometer, GAT) in patients with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) and in healthy subjects.A total of 42 eyes of healthy subjects (G1) and 40 patients with PCG (G2) were analysed. The following clinical data were collected: gender, age, Cup/Disc ratio, central corneal thickness (CCT). IOP was determined in the examination room using the IC200 and GAT tonometers, in the same order.Agreement between both tonometers was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. A linear regression analysis was used to establish the IOP was affected by the studied variables.Mean IOP between both tonometers (IC200 minus GAT) was: G1 = 15.91 (2.57) mm Hg vs. 15.06 (2.12) mm Hg (mean difference, MD = 0.84 (0.50) mm Hg; P < .101) and G2 = 20.10 (6.37) vs.19.12 (5.62) (MD = 0.98 (1.36); P = .474).Excellent agreement was found between IC200 and GAT in both groups (ICC = G1: 0.875 (95% CI; 0.768-0.933; P < .001); G2: 0.924 (95% CI; 0.852-0.961; P < .001), and there was a statistically significant correlation between the IOP difference measured with IC200 and GAT and CCT in G1 (B = 0.021; 95% CI; 0.005–0.037; P = .008), but was not statistically significant in G2.There was excellent agreement between the IC200 and GAT tonometers, both in healthy subjects and PCG, with a trend to overestimate IOP when measured with IC200. There was no influence by CCT on IOP measurements in patients with PGC." @default.
• W3195093025 created "2021-08-30" @default.
• W3195093025 creator A5003345723 @default.
• W3195093025 date "2021-10-01" @default.
• W3195093025 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W3195093025 title "A change of algorithm in the initial treatment of glaucoma" @default.
• W3195093025 cites W1203201687 @default.
• W3195093025 cites W1971440293 @default.
• W3195093025 cites W2058127365 @default.
• W3195093025 cites W2078889609 @default.
• W3195093025 cites W2083500802 @default.
• W3195093025 cites W2127559507 @default.
• W3195093025 cites W2135006936 @default.
• W3195093025 cites W2921734131 @default.
• W3195093025 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2021.07.004" @default.
• W3195093025 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34844682" @default.
• W3195093025 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3195093025 type Work @default.
• W3195093025 sameAs 3195093025 @default.
• W3195093025 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3195093025 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3195093025 hasAuthorship W3195093025A5003345723 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConceptScore W3195093025C118487528 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConceptScore W3195093025C121332964 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConceptScore W3195093025C142362112 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConceptScore W3195093025C15708023 @default.
• W3195093025 hasConceptScore W3195093025C71924100 @default.
• W3195093025 hasLocation W31950930251 @default.
• W3195093025 hasLocation W31950930252 @default.
• W3195093025 hasOpenAccess W3195093025 @default.
• W3195093025 hasPrimaryLocation W31950930251 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W2740647293 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W2742816064 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W2935759653 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W2997727571 @default.
• W3195093025 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W3195093025 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3195093025 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3195093025 magId "3195093025" @default.
• W3195093025 workType "article" @default.