FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3195444664> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3195444664 abstract "Postoperative care after nasal surgery is commonly achieved with nasal sprays. The current study compared two decongesting, wound-healing nasal sprays in patients after nasal surgery in order to investigate their sensory perception. One of the sprays was a new galenic formulation (nasic® neo, Cassella-med GmbH & Co. KG).According to the crossover design, patients who had undergone nasal surgery applied two different nasal sprays during two treatment periods of 4 days each, interrupted by a 3-day washout period. Sensory perception of the nasal sprays was assessed with the nasal spray sensoric scale. Throughout the study, nasal obstruction was evaluated by patients, and physical examinations, measurements of vital parameters and rhinoscopic examinations were carried out by investigators. Adverse events were documented during the entire study, and following treatment, patients judged the overall preference, efficacy and tolerability of both products.Overall, no significant differences in sum scores of the assessments of the nasal spray sensoric scale were observed between treatments. A significant period effect observed during the crossover study limited the overall analysis. Nevertheless, significantly more patients preferred the new galenics nasal spray compared to the comparator spray (57.1% vs. 34.7%; p = 0.031). Further, 10% more patients rated the efficacy of the new galenics as 'good' to 'very good' compared to the comparator. Importantly, a subgroup population of patients with more pronounced signs of inflammation present at screening evaluated the sensory perception of the new galenics as significantly better (p = 0.033) compared to the comparator. Within this subgroup, no period effect was observed. The application of both nasal sprays was shown to be safe and well-tolerated.The overall sensory perception of both nasal sprays was evaluated comparably well in patients after nasal surgery and overall the application of the new galenics nasal spray was preferred by significantly more patients compared to the comparator nasal spray. Patients with marked nasal abnormalities may have a greater benefit from the contribution of galenics as significant differences in the sensory evaluation by the nasal spray sensoric scale in favour of the new galenics product were shown for this subgroup.The current study was registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register with the EudraCT No. 2019-004936-52." @default.
• W3195444664 created "2021-08-30" @default.
• W3195444664 creator A5003040754 @default.
• W3195444664 creator A5015110544 @default.
• W3195444664 creator A5019966855 @default.
• W3195444664 creator A5044631446 @default.
• W3195444664 creator A5055985427 @default.
• W3195444664 creator A5060479544 @default.
• W3195444664 date "2021-10-24" @default.
• W3195444664 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W3195444664 title "The Contribution of Galenics to Patients’ Sensory Perception of Nasal Sprays After Nasal Surgery: Data from a Prospective Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover, Multicentre Study" @default.
• W3195444664 cites W150080734 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W1973796308 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W1990793227 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2020491254 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2031826255 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2072211320 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2075510351 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2150924002 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W232099454 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2428676491 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2433008093 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2734420315 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2799993603 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2845249065 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W2993259418 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W3005636222 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W30192546 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W3023799094 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W3147010543 @default.
• W3195444664 cites W832222333 @default.
• W3195444664 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01937-x" @default.
• W3195444664 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8572192" @default.
• W3195444664 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34689304" @default.
• W3195444664 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3195444664 type Work @default.
• W3195444664 sameAs 3195444664 @default.
• W3195444664 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3195444664 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3195444664 hasAuthorship W3195444664A5003040754 @default.
• W3195444664 hasAuthorship W3195444664A5015110544 @default.
• W3195444664 hasAuthorship W3195444664A5019966855 @default.
• W3195444664 hasAuthorship W3195444664A5044631446 @default.
• W3195444664 hasAuthorship W3195444664A5055985427 @default.
• W3195444664 hasAuthorship W3195444664A5060479544 @default.
• W3195444664 hasBestOaLocation W31954446641 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C27081682 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C2778375690 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C2780973058 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C85663871 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C87813604 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C126322002 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C141071460 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C142724271 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C197934379 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C203014093 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C204787440 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C27081682 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C2775944032 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C2778375690 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C2780973058 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C2908647359 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C42219234 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C71924100 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C85663871 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C87813604 @default.
• W3195444664 hasConceptScore W3195444664C99454951 @default.
• W3195444664 hasLocation W31954446641 @default.
• W3195444664 hasLocation W31954446642 @default.
• W3195444664 hasLocation W31954446643 @default.
• W3195444664 hasOpenAccess W3195444664 @default.
• W3195444664 hasPrimaryLocation W31954446641 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W1584193392 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W1969236408 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W1997177751 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W1998720703 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W2016005474 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W2064366716 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W2091079990 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W2146907577 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W2156439264 @default.
• W3195444664 hasRelatedWork W2513426503 @default.
• W3195444664 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3195444664 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3195444664 magId "3195444664" @default.
• W3195444664 workType "article" @default.