FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3196228793> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3196228793 abstract "Abstract Background The educational efficacy in neonatal resuscitation relies on the subject and teaching strategies. Therefore, it is imperative to test diverse educational methods if they are more instructive to engage students in active learning and practicing knowledge. Hence, the present study aims to investigate the efficacy of a pedagogical framework in neonatal resuscitation skill learning among nursing students in a resource-limited setting. Methods A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between October 2020 to March 2021. Sixty nursing students in the 3rd and 4th year of professional training were randomly allocated to the pedagogy and the traditional group. The pedagogy group learned via 6-step LSPPDM (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, Maintain) pedagogy including lectures, video, clinical observation, skill sessions under supervision, and self-directed practice. The traditional group learned through 2-step (Learn, Practice) method that included lectures and skill sessions under supervision. The outcomes measured included technical and non-technical skills in neonatal resuscitation. The technical skill deals with steps such as stimulation, ventilation, oxygenation, intubation, chest compression, medications, and reporting. Non-technical skills refer to teamwork skills that focus on the interaction between leader and helper. Both skills were measured through previously published validated tools two times before and after the intervention by blinded assessors in a simulated delivery room. Results Overall, the skill was significantly improved in both groups after intervention. Yet, the results showed that the mean difference of technical skill score in the pedagogy group (24.3 ± 3.5) was significantly higher ( p < 0.001) compared to the traditional group (16.2 ± 2.4). Likewise, the mean difference of non-technical skill score in the pedagogy (36.9 ± 1.9) was highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to the traditional group (31.2 ± 1.7). Conclusions The LSPPDM pedagogy was found more effective in enhancing technical and non-technical skills in neonatal resuscitation compared to the traditional method. The results of this study support the efficacy of the 6-step LSPPDM pedagogy in the education of nursing students regarding neonatal resuscitation in a resource-limited setting. Trial registration Prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04748341 )." @default.
• W3196228793 created "2021-08-30" @default.
• W3196228793 creator A5007393843 @default.
• W3196228793 creator A5007836462 @default.
• W3196228793 creator A5036981690 @default.
• W3196228793 creator A5039418721 @default.
• W3196228793 creator A5054658697 @default.
• W3196228793 creator A5054821915 @default.
• W3196228793 creator A5056733526 @default.
• W3196228793 date "2021-08-18" @default.
• W3196228793 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3196228793 title "Efficacy of pedagogical framework in neonatal resuscitation skill learning in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial" @default.
• W3196228793 cites W1816602866 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W1976428933 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W1976892689 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2025831245 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2031675659 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2100995693 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2127059617 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2134875401 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2143050459 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2168010799 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2274562466 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2410739974 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2468536297 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2606860740 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2765164445 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2782037101 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2783441686 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2793801407 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2794515627 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2805539685 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2889226079 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2889482071 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2894814534 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2900772445 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2913529146 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2921549670 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2972277944 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2982610408 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W2983977345 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W3029754473 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W3033114149 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W3044841695 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W3089337313 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W3091210212 @default.
• W3196228793 cites W4252933045 @default.
• W3196228793 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02846-x" @default.
• W3196228793 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8371841" @default.
• W3196228793 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34407810" @default.
• W3196228793 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3196228793 type Work @default.
• W3196228793 sameAs 3196228793 @default.
• W3196228793 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3196228793 countsByYear W31962287932021 @default.
• W3196228793 countsByYear W31962287932022 @default.
• W3196228793 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3196228793 hasAuthorship W3196228793A5007393843 @default.
• W3196228793 hasAuthorship W3196228793A5007836462 @default.
• W3196228793 hasAuthorship W3196228793A5036981690 @default.
• W3196228793 hasAuthorship W3196228793A5039418721 @default.
• W3196228793 hasAuthorship W3196228793A5054658697 @default.
• W3196228793 hasAuthorship W3196228793A5054821915 @default.
• W3196228793 hasAuthorship W3196228793A5056733526 @default.
• W3196228793 hasBestOaLocation W31962287931 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C111226992 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C2780843067 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C111226992 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C141071460 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C15744967 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C159110408 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C168563851 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C17744445 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C199539241 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C2778165595 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C2780665704 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C2780843067 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C42219234 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C509550671 @default.
• W3196228793 hasConceptScore W3196228793C71924100 @default.
• W3196228793 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3196228793 hasLocation W31962287931 @default.
• W3196228793 hasLocation W31962287932 @default.
• W3196228793 hasLocation W31962287933 @default.
• W3196228793 hasOpenAccess W3196228793 @default.
• W3196228793 hasPrimaryLocation W31962287931 @default.
• W3196228793 hasRelatedWork W2235574018 @default.
• W3196228793 hasRelatedWork W2507295142 @default.
• W3196228793 hasRelatedWork W2586212106 @default.

• next