Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3196400624> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 36 of
36
with 100 items per page.
- W3196400624 abstract "Recent U.S. Supreme Court cases present an opportunity to apply a new form of analysis to discrimination claims. In 2018’s Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission and 2021’s Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, there is a party complaining about discrimination on each side of the dispute. In both cases, one side (respondent) claims that the other (petitioner) is discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation, while the other side (petitioner) claims that subjecting petitioner to the law prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination itself discriminates on the basis of religion. With discrimination claims coming from both directions, this Article/Essay performs what it calls “mirror-image analysis” to better understand how the Court thinks about the issues it faces in Free Exercise cases. Mirror-image analysis takes a definition that the Court applies to one side of the dispute, whether it is the definition of discrimination or coercion, and considers what the other side’s claim would look like if it deployed similarly capacious definitions of both terms. The Article/Essay uses hypothetical cases, some quite provocative, to help clarify the nature of the Court’s approach to Free Exercise. It concludes that because the religions at issue in both Masterpiece Cakeshop and Fulton were mainstream Christian faiths, it takes a mirror to appreciate how extreme the Court’s analysis of religious freedom has become." @default.
- W3196400624 created "2021-09-13" @default.
- W3196400624 creator A5086204400 @default.
- W3196400624 date "2021-01-01" @default.
- W3196400624 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W3196400624 title "Free Exercise in the Mirror" @default.
- W3196400624 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3916992" @default.
- W3196400624 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3196400624 type Work @default.
- W3196400624 sameAs 3196400624 @default.
- W3196400624 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3196400624 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3196400624 hasAuthorship W3196400624A5086204400 @default.
- W3196400624 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3196400624 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3196400624 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
- W3196400624 hasConceptScore W3196400624C15744967 @default.
- W3196400624 hasConceptScore W3196400624C71924100 @default.
- W3196400624 hasConceptScore W3196400624C99508421 @default.
- W3196400624 hasLocation W31964006241 @default.
- W3196400624 hasOpenAccess W3196400624 @default.
- W3196400624 hasPrimaryLocation W31964006241 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W1710126152 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W2053487507 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W2077865380 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W2138503431 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W2765597752 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W2789488587 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W2931662336 @default.
- W3196400624 hasRelatedWork W3049356719 @default.
- W3196400624 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3196400624 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3196400624 magId "3196400624" @default.
- W3196400624 workType "article" @default.