FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3196919964> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3196919964 abstract "Abstract Background Eligibility criteria are a fundamental element of clinical trial design, defining who can and who should not participate in a trial. Problems with the design or application of criteria are known to occur and pose risks to participants’ safety and trial integrity, sometimes also negatively impacting on trial recruitment and generalisability. We conducted a short, exploratory survey to gather evidence on UK recruiters’ experiences interpreting and applying eligibility criteria and their views on how criteria are communicated and developed. Methods Our survey included topics informed by a wider programme of work at the Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, on assuring eligibility criteria quality. Respondents were asked to answer based on all their trial experience, not only on experiences with our trials. The survey was disseminated to recruiters collaborating on trials run at our trials unit, and via other mailing lists and social media. The quantitative responses were descriptively analysed, with inductive analysis of free-text responses to identify themes. Results A total of 823 eligible respondents participated. In total, 79% of respondents reported finding problems with eligibility criteria in some trials, and 9% in most trials. The main themes in the types of problems experienced were criteria clarity (67% of comments), feasibility (34%), and suitability (14%). In total, 27% of those reporting some level of problem said these problems had led to patients being incorrectly included in trials; 40% said they had led to incorrect exclusions. Most respondents (56%) reported accessing eligibility criteria mainly in the trial protocol. Most respondents (74%) supported the idea of recruiter review of eligibility criteria earlier in the protocol development process. Conclusions Our survey corroborates other evidence about the existence of suboptimal trial eligibility criteria. Problems with clarity were the most often reported, but the number of comments on feasibility and suitability suggest some recruiters feel eligibility criteria and associated assessments can hinder recruitment to trials. Our proposal for more recruiter involvement in protocol development has strong support and some potential benefits, but questions remain about how best to implement this. We invite other trialists to consider our other suggestions for how to assure quality in trial eligibility criteria." @default.
• W3196919964 created "2021-09-13" @default.
• W3196919964 creator A5009504565 @default.
• W3196919964 creator A5022542583 @default.
• W3196919964 creator A5026172922 @default.
• W3196919964 creator A5045899108 @default.
• W3196919964 creator A5055928644 @default.
• W3196919964 creator A5065954659 @default.
• W3196919964 date "2021-10-24" @default.
• W3196919964 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3196919964 title "Clinical trial recruiters’ experiences working with trial eligibility criteria: results of an exploratory, cross-sectional, online survey in the UK" @default.
• W3196919964 cites W1628337458 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W1823971301 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W1944353728 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W1963480694 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W1995899261 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2006989940 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2010816763 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2043990618 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2046392066 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2058369556 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2066578320 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2079624525 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2098590492 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2113161457 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2114874476 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2126125660 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2128251606 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2128614409 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2129212156 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2130048159 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2136892596 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2137329887 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2147397495 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2167445077 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2171811563 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2339055359 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2403515688 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2411041906 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2525999137 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2534600101 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2600098306 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2603257905 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2610639175 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2745487521 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2761072514 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2763133656 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2766144316 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2778801047 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2782962321 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2784969024 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2795659920 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2797207143 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2888370410 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2902219846 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2944133897 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2946236479 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2981528097 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2982520251 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2991204965 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2993885906 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2997080825 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W3009768886 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W3093511019 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W3109146887 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W3118720107 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W3124574955 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W3154790864 @default.
• W3196919964 cites W2146592170 @default.
• W3196919964 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05723-6" @default.
• W3196919964 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8628429" @default.
• W3196919964 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34844638" @default.
• W3196919964 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3196919964 type Work @default.
• W3196919964 sameAs 3196919964 @default.
• W3196919964 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3196919964 countsByYear W31969199642021 @default.
• W3196919964 countsByYear W31969199642022 @default.
• W3196919964 countsByYear W31969199642023 @default.
• W3196919964 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3196919964 hasAuthorship W3196919964A5009504565 @default.
• W3196919964 hasAuthorship W3196919964A5022542583 @default.
• W3196919964 hasAuthorship W3196919964A5026172922 @default.
• W3196919964 hasAuthorship W3196919964A5045899108 @default.
• W3196919964 hasAuthorship W3196919964A5055928644 @default.
• W3196919964 hasAuthorship W3196919964A5065954659 @default.
• W3196919964 hasBestOaLocation W31969199641 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C2777146004 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3196919964 hasConcept C535046627 @default.

• next