FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3197290433> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3197290433 abstract "Abstract Background Nearly 56% of at-risk carriers are not identified and missed as a result of the current family-history (FH) screening for genetic testing. The present study aims to review the economic evaluation studies on BRCA genetic testing strategies for screening and early detection of breast cancer. Methods This systematic literature review is conducted within the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and EMBASE databases. In this paper, the relevant published economic evaluation studies are identified by following the standard Cochrane Collaboration methods and adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement reporting some recommendations for articles up to March 2020. Thereafter, the inclusion and exclusion criteria are applied to screen the articles. Disagreements are resolved through a consensus meeting. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist is used in the evaluation of quality. Finally, a narrative synthesis is performed. To compare the different levels of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), the net present value is calculated based on a discount rate of 3% in 2019. Results Among 788 initially retrieved citations, 12 studies were included. More than 60% of the studies were originated from high-income countries and were published after 2016. It is noteworthy that most of the studies evaluated the payer perspective. Moreover, the robustness of the results were analyzed through one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses in nearly 66% of these studies. Nearly, 25% of the studies are focused and defined population-based and family history BRCA tests as comparators; afterwards, the cost-effectiveness of the former was confirmed. The highest and lowest absolute values for the ICERs were $65,661 and $9 per quality adjusted life years, respectively. All studies met over 70% of the CHEERs criteria checklist, which was considered as 93% of high quality on average as well. Conclusions The genetic BRCA tests for the general population as well as unselected breast cancer patients were cost-effective in high and upper-middle income countries and those with prevalence of gene mutation while population-based genetic tests for low-middle income countries are depended on the price of the tests." @default.
• W3197290433 created "2021-09-13" @default.
• W3197290433 creator A5012018022 @default.
• W3197290433 creator A5052002528 @default.
• W3197290433 creator A5077929394 @default.
• W3197290433 creator A5081108422 @default.
• W3197290433 creator A5086398649 @default.
• W3197290433 date "2021-08-28" @default.
• W3197290433 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W3197290433 title "Population or family history based BRCA gene tests of breast cancer? A systematic review of economic evaluations" @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2007872832 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2030005743 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2074264393 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2074553746 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2096408397 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2113722325 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2126871347 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2156449682 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2336441489 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2567362164 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2582664929 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2590877603 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2606122658 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2731309476 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2732266669 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2778523496 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2787869143 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2792269744 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2796880158 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2803602511 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2899720933 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2905188179 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2910447790 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2915479702 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2944819152 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W2995485512 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W3034832942 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W3043036428 @default.
• W3197290433 cites W3044545425 @default.
• W3197290433 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00191-0" @default.
• W3197290433 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8399845" @default.
• W3197290433 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34454549" @default.
• W3197290433 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3197290433 type Work @default.
• W3197290433 sameAs 3197290433 @default.
• W3197290433 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3197290433 countsByYear W31972904332022 @default.
• W3197290433 countsByYear W31972904332023 @default.
• W3197290433 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3197290433 hasAuthorship W3197290433A5012018022 @default.
• W3197290433 hasAuthorship W3197290433A5052002528 @default.
• W3197290433 hasAuthorship W3197290433A5077929394 @default.
• W3197290433 hasAuthorship W3197290433A5081108422 @default.
• W3197290433 hasAuthorship W3197290433A5086398649 @default.
• W3197290433 hasBestOaLocation W31972904331 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C2780673598 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C2781179581 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C121608353 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C126322002 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C142724271 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C15744967 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C17744445 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C180747234 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C189708586 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C199539241 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C2776125615 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C2776478404 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C2779356329 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C2779473830 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C2780673598 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C2781179581 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C2908647359 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C29456083 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C512399662 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C530470458 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C71924100 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C83867959 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C95190672 @default.
• W3197290433 hasConceptScore W3197290433C99454951 @default.
• W3197290433 hasFunder F4320313199 @default.

• next