FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3197580581> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3197580581 abstract "Quantitative human rights scholarship is increasing. New data sets and methods have helped researchers examine a broad array of research questions concerning the many human rights laid out in the United Nations’ 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and related documents. These innovations have enabled quantitative human rights scholarship to better connect to existing qualitative and theoretical literatures and have improved advocacy efforts. Quantitative scholars have primarily operationalized the concept of human rights through the use of four kinds of data: events data (such as counts of abuses or attacks), standards-based data (such as coded scores), survey data, and socioeconomic statistics (such as maternal mortality or malnutrition rates). Each type of data poses particular challenges and weaknesses for analyses, including the biased undercounts of events data and the potential for human error or biases in survey or standards-based data. The human rights field has also seen a systematic overrepresentation of analyses of physical integrity rights, which have fewer component parts to measure. Furthermore, qualitative scholars have pointed out that it is difficult for quantitative data to capture the process of human rights improvement over time. The creation of new technologies and methodologies has allowed quantitative researchers to lessen the impact of these data weaknesses: Latent variables allow scholars to create aggregate measures from a variety of classes of quantitative data, as well as understandings from qualitative scholars, leading to the creation of new measures for rights other than physical integrity rights. New machine learning techniques and algorithms are giving scholars access to greater amounts of data than ever before, improving event counts. Expert surveys are pulling new voices into the data-generating process and incorporating practitioners into data processes that are too often restricted to academics. Experimental studies are furthering the field’s understanding of the processes underlying advocacy. Drawing on the lessons of past work, future scholars can use quantitative methods to improve the field’s theoretical and practical understandings of human rights." @default.
• W3197580581 created "2021-09-13" @default.
• W3197580581 creator A5003862545 @default.
• W3197580581 creator A5090858401 @default.
• W3197580581 date "2021-06-28" @default.
• W3197580581 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3197580581 title "Quantitative Human Rights" @default.
• W3197580581 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.603" @default.
• W3197580581 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3197580581 type Work @default.
• W3197580581 sameAs 3197580581 @default.
• W3197580581 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3197580581 crossrefType "reference-entry" @default.
• W3197580581 hasAuthorship W3197580581A5003862545 @default.
• W3197580581 hasAuthorship W3197580581A5090858401 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C87156501 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConcept C9354725 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C111472728 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C119857082 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C138885662 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C144024400 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C169437150 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C17744445 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C199539241 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C2522767166 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C2778061430 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C41008148 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C87156501 @default.
• W3197580581 hasConceptScore W3197580581C9354725 @default.
• W3197580581 hasLocation W31975805811 @default.
• W3197580581 hasOpenAccess W3197580581 @default.
• W3197580581 hasPrimaryLocation W31975805811 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W1024404 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W154497 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W2526798 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W2828700 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W2934586 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W6277818 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W6301752 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W6369574 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W7463717 @default.
• W3197580581 hasRelatedWork W7899391 @default.
• W3197580581 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3197580581 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3197580581 magId "3197580581" @default.
• W3197580581 workType "reference-entry" @default.