Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3197788197> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 76 of
76
with 100 items per page.
- W3197788197 endingPage "681e" @default.
- W3197788197 startingPage "679e" @default.
- W3197788197 abstract "Nowadays, the most frequently used and validated patient-reported outcome measurement for aesthetic facial procedures is the FACE-Q questionnaire.1–3 To date, no publications are available assessing the influence of age on satisfaction based on the FACE-Q questionnaire in a normative population. Therefore, this study assessed whether facial appearance measured by different modules of the FACE-Q questionnaire was age related in women who never received an aesthetic facial procedure. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed by the University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands (institutional review board protocol no. 201700392). Female volunteers aged 18 years or older, without a history of any facial surgical procedures (e.g., orthognathic surgery, oncologic surgery, face lift, lipofilling) or minimally invasive aesthetic procedures (e.g., injectables), were randomly asked to participate. An equal distribution in age was pursued, resulting in 180 participants. A selection of modules of the validated FACE-Q questionnaire1–3 was sent by e-mail. (See Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which shows the Rasch scores of all selected FACE-Q modules per age group, https://links.lww.com/PRS/E628.) The population was subdivided into five age categories: 18 to 29 years, 30 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, and 60 years or older. Association between overall satisfaction and age and associations between different FACE-Q modules were assessed by the Spearman rho test. Differences in FACE-Q scores between age groups were assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. A total of 155 of the 180 participants who signed the informed consent completed the FACE-Q questionnaires. The median score of overall satisfaction with facial appearance was 59 (interquartile range, 51 to 70) (Fig. 1) and was not significantly associated with age (p = 0.776) or with age group (p = 0.994) (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, https://links.lww.com/PRS/E628).Fig. 1.: The median Rasch score for overall satisfaction with facial appearance is independent of age. y, years; open circles, outliers.The percentages of the FACE-Q scores for the different parts of the face (i.e., cheeks, lower face and jawline, eyes and skin) were not correlated with age (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, https://links.lww.com/PRS/E628). All the age-related modules, except crow’s feet, were positively correlated with age, whereby older women reported that they were more bothered by their aging face. Significant correlations were found between psychological well-being and satisfaction with overall facial appearance (0.569; p < 0.000) and psychological well-being and social function (0.669; p < 0.001). This prospective cross-sectional study showed a strong positive correlation between the overall facial appearance and psychological well-being, a correlation that also has been reported for specific patient populations.4,5 The positive correlation indicates that psychological well-being is a valuable predictor for overall facial appearance. For this study, a general Dutch population (Northern Europe) was used to assess satisfaction with facial appearance in women. Variations regarding aesthetic ideals and aesthetic demands between cultures might exist. Therefore, there is a need for cross-cultural validation studies to assess the normal range of the FACE-Q questionnaire for different cultural groups. In conclusion, the overall average satisfaction with facial appearance, as determined by the FACE-Q scores, is not influenced by age in women that never had any aesthetic facial procedure. However, elderly women reported significantly more complaints on specific modules referring to their aging face, such as wrinkles, upper eyelids, lips, and nasolabial folds. The obtained normative data set of the FACE-Q questionnaires in this study can be used as normative data to which results of preoperative and postoperative values of the FACE-Q after aesthetic facial procedures can be compared. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. No funding was received to assist in the creation of this article." @default.
- W3197788197 created "2021-09-13" @default.
- W3197788197 creator A5000895709 @default.
- W3197788197 creator A5015537427 @default.
- W3197788197 creator A5024201199 @default.
- W3197788197 creator A5051539210 @default.
- W3197788197 creator A5060952839 @default.
- W3197788197 creator A5064843084 @default.
- W3197788197 creator A5078999248 @default.
- W3197788197 date "2021-09-07" @default.
- W3197788197 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W3197788197 title "Effect of Age on Satisfaction with Facial Appearance in Women Based on the FACE-Q Questionnaire in a Dutch Normative Population" @default.
- W3197788197 cites W1547553064 @default.
- W3197788197 cites W2079745246 @default.
- W3197788197 cites W2174112030 @default.
- W3197788197 cites W2292866786 @default.
- W3197788197 cites W2779410244 @default.
- W3197788197 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000008359" @default.
- W3197788197 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34495923" @default.
- W3197788197 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3197788197 type Work @default.
- W3197788197 sameAs 3197788197 @default.
- W3197788197 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W3197788197 countsByYear W31977881972023 @default.
- W3197788197 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3197788197 hasAuthorship W3197788197A5000895709 @default.
- W3197788197 hasAuthorship W3197788197A5015537427 @default.
- W3197788197 hasAuthorship W3197788197A5024201199 @default.
- W3197788197 hasAuthorship W3197788197A5051539210 @default.
- W3197788197 hasAuthorship W3197788197A5060952839 @default.
- W3197788197 hasAuthorship W3197788197A5064843084 @default.
- W3197788197 hasAuthorship W3197788197A5078999248 @default.
- W3197788197 hasBestOaLocation W31977881971 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C2777359053 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C111472728 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C138885662 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C141071460 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C2775944032 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C2777359053 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C2908647359 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C44725695 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C71924100 @default.
- W3197788197 hasConceptScore W3197788197C99454951 @default.
- W3197788197 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W3197788197 hasLocation W31977881971 @default.
- W3197788197 hasLocation W31977881972 @default.
- W3197788197 hasLocation W31977881973 @default.
- W3197788197 hasLocation W31977881974 @default.
- W3197788197 hasLocation W31977881975 @default.
- W3197788197 hasOpenAccess W3197788197 @default.
- W3197788197 hasPrimaryLocation W31977881971 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
- W3197788197 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
- W3197788197 hasVolume "148" @default.
- W3197788197 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3197788197 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3197788197 magId "3197788197" @default.
- W3197788197 workType "article" @default.