FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3198454908> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3198454908 endingPage "17" @default.
• W3198454908 startingPage "5" @default.
• W3198454908 abstract "Abstract Study design/methods Review article. Objectives The goal of this article is to review the available evidence for computerized navigation and robotics as an accuracy improvement tool for spinal deformity surgery, as well as to consider potential complications, impact on clinical outcomes, radiation exposure, and costs. Summary of background data/results Pedicle screw and rod construct are widely utilized for posterior spinal fixation in spinal deformity correction. Freehand placement of pedicle screws has long been utilized, although there is variable potential for inaccuracy depending on surgeon skill and experience. Malpositioned pedicle screws may have significant clinical implications ranging from nerve root irritation, inadequate fixation, CSF leak, perforation of the great vessels, or spinal cord damage. Computer-based navigation and robotics systems were developed to improve pedicle screw insertion accuracy and consistency, and decrease the risk of malpositioned pedicle fixation. The available evidence suggests that computer-based navigation and robotic-assisted guidance systems for pedicle cannulation are at least equivalent, and in several reports superior, to freehand techniques in terms of accuracy. CT and robotic navigation systems do appear to decrease radiation exposure to the operative team in some reports. Published reports do indicate longer operative times with use of robotic navigation compared with traditional freehand techniques for pedicle screw placement. To date, there is no conclusive evidence that use of CT or robotic navigation has any measurable impact on patient outcomes or overall complication reduction. There are theoretical advantages with robotic and CT navigation in terms of both speed and accuracy for severe spinal deformity or complex revision cases, however, there is a need for studies to investigate this technology in these specific cases. There is no evidence to date demonstrating the cost effectiveness of CT or robotic navigation as compared with traditional pedicle cannulation techniques. Conclusions The review of available evidence suggests that computer-based navigation and robotic-assisted guidance systems for pedicle cannulation are at least equivalent, and in several reports superior, to freehand techniques in terms of radiographic accuracy. There is no current clinical evidence that the use of navigation or robotic techniques leads to improved patient outcomes or decreased overall complications or reoperation rates, and the use of these systems may substantially increase surgical costs. Level of evidence V." @default.
• W3198454908 created "2021-09-13" @default.
• W3198454908 creator A5020880696 @default.
• W3198454908 creator A5055889649 @default.
• W3198454908 creator A5067545842 @default.
• W3198454908 creator A5075875349 @default.
• W3198454908 date "2021-09-06" @default.
• W3198454908 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3198454908 title "State of the art review of new technologies in spine deformity surgery–robotics and navigation" @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1553603089 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1899693549 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1964307952 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1964759574 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1965982339 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1969507536 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1976311171 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1977683525 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1978261957 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W1992263030 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2008086947 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2009654961 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2018779420 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2019160352 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2033710839 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2038606733 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2058940360 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2072274545 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2074739320 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2076574727 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2081494650 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2082554100 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2108790585 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2123742371 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2157266838 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2271989218 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2318019373 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2329324539 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2415759137 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2470250702 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2473579408 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2524526560 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2594164048 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2763362633 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2766275291 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2792215746 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2795501293 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2801674989 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2802726018 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2904543100 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2914902411 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2921973868 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2943232646 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2951584572 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W2980369876 @default.
• W3198454908 cites W4246387788 @default.
• W3198454908 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00403-6" @default.
• W3198454908 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34487345" @default.
• W3198454908 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3198454908 type Work @default.
• W3198454908 sameAs 3198454908 @default.
• W3198454908 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W3198454908 countsByYear W31984549082022 @default.
• W3198454908 countsByYear W31984549082023 @default.
• W3198454908 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3198454908 hasAuthorship W3198454908A5020880696 @default.
• W3198454908 hasAuthorship W3198454908A5055889649 @default.
• W3198454908 hasAuthorship W3198454908A5067545842 @default.
• W3198454908 hasAuthorship W3198454908A5075875349 @default.
• W3198454908 hasBestOaLocation W31984549081 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C2775901119 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C2777891301 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C2779982284 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C2992931878 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C34413123 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C90509273 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C127413603 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C141071460 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C146249460 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C154945302 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C2775901119 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C2777891301 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C2778456384 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C2778527123 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C2779982284 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C2908647359 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C2992931878 @default.
• W3198454908 hasConceptScore W3198454908C34413123 @default.

• next