FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3199335220> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3199335220 endingPage "300" @default.
• W3199335220 startingPage "300" @default.
• W3199335220 abstract "Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is an important indicator of renal function. Many methods have been developed to determine GFR in clinical examinations. This study aims to correlate between radionuclide plasma sampling methods (single and double blood samples, in vitro methods) and in vivo Gate's method using 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) renography.43 patients underwent this study, including 31 renal donors (Group 1) and 12 patients with obstructive uropathy (Group 2). All patients were administered with a range of 5-7 mCi of 99mTc-DTPA. Then, renography performed simultaneously after injection and GFR calculation followed by Gate's method. Blood samples were collected at 60- and 120-min postinjection, samples were counted by a thyroid uptake system, and GFR was calculated using a single plasma sample method (SPSM) and a double plasma sample method (DPSM).The mean GFRs calculated by Gate's method in Groups 1 and 2 were 85.8 ± 18.2 ml/min and 118.4 ± 13.9 ml/min, respectively. Meanwhile, using the in vitro blood sampling methods (DPSM and SPSM), the mean GFRs in Group 1 were 73.8 ± 15.4 ml/min and 56.4 ± 20.9 ml/min, respectively, and in Group 2 were 116.8 ± 12.9 ml/min and 106.3 ± 18.5 ml/min, respectively. There is a high correlation between Gate's method and DPSM in two groups (r = 0.86 and 0.72, respectively), and a moderate correlation was found between Gate's method and SPSM in both groups (r = 0.49 and r = 0.37, respectively). The two in vitro methods (DPSM and SPSM) revealed that moderate correlation in both groups (r = 0.74 and r = 0.67, respectively) was observed.Renography is a simple method but considered inaccurate for GFR determination. However, in vitro plasma sampling is rarely used in Vietnam. In this study, Gate's method correlated well with DPSM and tended to overestimate GFR. Further, the in vitro methods can be applied to correct the in vivo method as a confirmatory test in some cases." @default.
• W3199335220 created "2021-09-27" @default.
• W3199335220 creator A5020229704 @default.
• W3199335220 creator A5051450796 @default.
• W3199335220 creator A5066251320 @default.
• W3199335220 creator A5086891568 @default.
• W3199335220 creator A5089647550 @default.
• W3199335220 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W3199335220 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3199335220 title "Comparison between Three Techniques for Determining Glomerular Filtration Rates: 99mTc-Diethylene Triamine Penta-Acetic Acid Renography, Double Plasma Sampling Method, and Single Plasma Sampling Method in Vietnamese Patients" @default.
• W3199335220 cites W125318081 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W1996387976 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2006090662 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2040011280 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2054970136 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2072371345 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2088546550 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2094160341 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2101553042 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2157266449 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2412771192 @default.
• W3199335220 cites W2974701580 @default.
• W3199335220 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_240_20" @default.
• W3199335220 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8481861" @default.
• W3199335220 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34658555" @default.
• W3199335220 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3199335220 type Work @default.
• W3199335220 sameAs 3199335220 @default.
• W3199335220 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3199335220 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3199335220 hasAuthorship W3199335220A5020229704 @default.
• W3199335220 hasAuthorship W3199335220A5051450796 @default.
• W3199335220 hasAuthorship W3199335220A5066251320 @default.
• W3199335220 hasAuthorship W3199335220A5086891568 @default.
• W3199335220 hasAuthorship W3199335220A5089647550 @default.
• W3199335220 hasBestOaLocation W31993352202 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConcept C159641895 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConcept C2988731192 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConceptScore W3199335220C126322002 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConceptScore W3199335220C159641895 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConceptScore W3199335220C185592680 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConceptScore W3199335220C2988731192 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConceptScore W3199335220C2989005 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConceptScore W3199335220C43617362 @default.
• W3199335220 hasConceptScore W3199335220C71924100 @default.
• W3199335220 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3199335220 hasLocation W31993352201 @default.
• W3199335220 hasLocation W31993352202 @default.
• W3199335220 hasLocation W31993352203 @default.
• W3199335220 hasOpenAccess W3199335220 @default.
• W3199335220 hasPrimaryLocation W31993352201 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W1512194956 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W1556045557 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W2018538616 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W2887781971 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W2946124662 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W2966583093 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W2968232327 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W2979863804 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W3012417491 @default.
• W3199335220 hasRelatedWork W3158121814 @default.
• W3199335220 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W3199335220 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3199335220 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3199335220 magId "3199335220" @default.
• W3199335220 workType "article" @default.