FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3199792425> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3199792425 endingPage "1224" @default.
• W3199792425 startingPage "1217" @default.
• W3199792425 abstract "This study compared the quality of life (QoL) of 265 stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery alone (group 1: 137 patients) versus those who underwent primary radical surgery followed by radiotherapy (group 2: 128 patients) and identified clinical characteristics that predict the poor quality of life. All participants completed quality of life questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30 and CMU cervical cancer QoL. For the EORTC QLQ-C30, the study groups were comparable regarding global health status/QoL scale and summary scores. Group 1 participants had better scores on the physical functioning domain and some symptom scales/items. For the CMU Cervical Cancer QoL, group 1 participants had better scores on gastrointestinal, lymphatic, and sexual/hormonal domains. In multivariable analysis, adjuvant radiation was consistently associated with poor quality of life in most domains. In general, early-stage cervical cancer survivors had a satisfactory quality of life. The clinical significance of the quality of life score differences between the study groups remains debateable.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? For women with early cervical cancer, surgery is the main treatment providing not only a good chance for a cure by total removal of the cancer but also an opportunity to preserve the hormone-producing function of the ovary as well as the flexibility of the vagina. However, radiation treatment may be indicated after surgery in some patients depending on the findings from surgery. Because of the concern about increased complications and decreased long-term quality of life following the combined treatments, some may elect to avoid surgery and receive radiation alone in the first place. In this study, we compared the quality of life of women who had surgery alone to those who had surgery followed by radiation. This information is currently lacking in the medical literature.What do the results of this study add? We found that, in general, women with early cervical cancer had a satisfactory quality of life. For a patient who is surgically fit and chooses to receive primary surgery, if radiation is subsequently required, she could still expect the acceptable long-term quality of life–although slightly less satisfactory than receiving surgery alone but not inferior to those who receive primary radiation treatment.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings will be useful for pre-treatment counselling and posttreatment supportive care. The information regarding disease-related and treatment-induced morbidity should be thoroughly discussed with the patients before and after treatment. Also, the use of questionnaires examining general well-being together with a cancer-specific quality of life is recommended for the systematic evaluation of cancer survivors." @default.
• W3199792425 created "2021-09-27" @default.
• W3199792425 creator A5004095085 @default.
• W3199792425 creator A5012456180 @default.
• W3199792425 creator A5045425380 @default.
• W3199792425 creator A5089550376 @default.
• W3199792425 date "2021-09-23" @default.
• W3199792425 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3199792425 title "Health-related quality of life for early-stage cervical cancer survivors after primary radical surgery followed by radiotherapy versus radical surgery alone" @default.
• W3199792425 cites W1491802571 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W1972491700 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W1975431740 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W1982183902 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2009769036 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2021316856 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2022941659 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2030565520 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2039874934 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2050708871 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2051179552 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2056352071 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2070789376 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2109916320 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2120405223 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2157719711 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2164963563 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2167571044 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2274071490 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2321414267 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2499497481 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2566595793 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2742585418 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2801949794 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W2966535122 @default.
• W3199792425 cites W4233921197 @default.
• W3199792425 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.1945013" @default.
• W3199792425 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34553649" @default.
• W3199792425 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3199792425 type Work @default.
• W3199792425 sameAs 3199792425 @default.
• W3199792425 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3199792425 countsByYear W31997924252023 @default.
• W3199792425 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3199792425 hasAuthorship W3199792425A5004095085 @default.
• W3199792425 hasAuthorship W3199792425A5012456180 @default.
• W3199792425 hasAuthorship W3199792425A5045425380 @default.
• W3199792425 hasAuthorship W3199792425A5089550376 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C2775871022 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C2776874909 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C2777744392 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C121608353 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C126322002 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C141071460 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C146357865 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C151730666 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C159110408 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C2775871022 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C2776874909 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C2777744392 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C2778220009 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C2779951463 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C509974204 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C535046627 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C71924100 @default.
• W3199792425 hasConceptScore W3199792425C86803240 @default.
• W3199792425 hasFunder F4320335180 @default.
• W3199792425 hasFunder F4320335535 @default.
• W3199792425 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3199792425 hasLocation W31997924251 @default.
• W3199792425 hasLocation W31997924252 @default.
• W3199792425 hasOpenAccess W3199792425 @default.
• W3199792425 hasPrimaryLocation W31997924251 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W2070138482 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W2106598299 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W2131231823 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W2168923614 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W2384708512 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W2404402449 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W3028926181 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W3199792425 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W4253632170 @default.
• W3199792425 hasRelatedWork W3022722134 @default.
• W3199792425 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W3199792425 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3199792425 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3199792425 magId "3199792425" @default.

• next