FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3199913737> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3199913737 endingPage "71.e12" @default.
• W3199913737 startingPage "60" @default.
• W3199913737 abstract "Several methods with variable efficacy have been proposed for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP. We assessed the comparative efficacy of different strategies for difficult biliary cannulation through a network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect treatment comparisons.We identified 17 randomized controlled trials (2015 patients) that compared the efficacy of different adjunctive methods for difficult biliary cannulation (needle-knife techniques, pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique, pancreatic-assisted technique, and transpancreatic sphincterotomy) either with each other or with persistence with the standard cannulation techniques. The success rate of biliary cannulation and the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) were the outcomes of interest. We performed pairwise and network meta-analysis for all treatments and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria to appraise quality of evidence.Low-quality evidence supported the use of transpancreatic sphincterotomy over persistence with standard cannulation techniques (risk ratio [RR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.59) and over any other adjunctive intervention (RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01-1.44] vs pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique, RR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.01-1.43] vs early needle-knife techniques, RR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.03-2.10] vs pancreatic stent-assisted technique) for increasing the success rate of biliary cannulation. No other significant results were observed in any other comparisons. Based on the network model, transpancreatic sphincterotomy (P-score, .97) followed by early needle-knife techniques (P-score, .62) were ranked highest in terms of increasing the success rate of biliary cannulation. Early needle-knife techniques outperformed persistence with standard cannulation techniques in terms of decreasing PEP rate (RR, .61; 95% CI, .37-1.00), whereas both early needle-knife techniques and transpancreatic sphincterotomy led to lower PEP rates as compared with pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique (RR, .49 [95% CI, .23-.99] and .53 [95% CI, .30-.92], respectively).Transpancreatic sphincterotomy increases the success rate of biliary cannulation as compared with persistence with the standard cannulation techniques. Early needle-knife techniques and transpancreatic sphincterotomy are superior to other interventions in decreasing PEP rates and should be considered in patients with difficult cannulation." @default.
• W3199913737 created "2021-09-27" @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5003597455 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5005551494 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5006994577 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5010071655 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5011315267 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5015947583 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5021880991 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5046982168 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5064347211 @default.
• W3199913737 creator A5073501343 @default.
• W3199913737 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W3199913737 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3199913737 title "Comparative efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: systematic review and network meta-analysis" @default.
• W3199913737 cites W119980213 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W1942664326 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W1978775180 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W1991468344 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2000595766 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2010118606 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2010699829 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2017000558 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2033960341 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2041059545 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2041584227 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2046361218 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2050448153 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2057787549 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2077128370 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2088170516 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2103251533 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2107328434 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2129875497 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2150529573 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2155798268 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2168046530 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2301092223 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2437182290 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2510287971 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2528314451 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2625628181 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2799843187 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2807849791 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2888205501 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2897347167 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2944181629 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W2996748935 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W3118595938 @default.
• W3199913737 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W3199913737 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.010" @default.
• W3199913737 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34543649" @default.
• W3199913737 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W3199913737 type Work @default.
• W3199913737 sameAs 3199913737 @default.
• W3199913737 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W3199913737 countsByYear W31999137372022 @default.
• W3199913737 countsByYear W31999137372023 @default.
• W3199913737 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5003597455 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5005551494 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5006994577 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5010071655 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5011315267 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5015947583 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5021880991 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5046982168 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5064347211 @default.
• W3199913737 hasAuthorship W3199913737A5073501343 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConcept C2780603604 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConceptScore W3199913737C126322002 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConceptScore W3199913737C141071460 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConceptScore W3199913737C168563851 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConceptScore W3199913737C2775967933 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConceptScore W3199913737C2780603604 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConceptScore W3199913737C44249647 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConceptScore W3199913737C71924100 @default.
• W3199913737 hasConceptScore W3199913737C95190672 @default.
• W3199913737 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3199913737 hasLocation W31999137371 @default.
• W3199913737 hasLocation W31999137372 @default.
• W3199913737 hasOpenAccess W3199913737 @default.
• W3199913737 hasPrimaryLocation W31999137371 @default.
• W3199913737 hasRelatedWork W1501586353 @default.
• W3199913737 hasRelatedWork W2068118511 @default.
• W3199913737 hasRelatedWork W2069796876 @default.
• W3199913737 hasRelatedWork W2112436308 @default.
• W3199913737 hasRelatedWork W2140661426 @default.
• W3199913737 hasRelatedWork W2355769538 @default.

• next