Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3199940272> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W3199940272 endingPage "605" @default.
- W3199940272 startingPage "597" @default.
- W3199940272 abstract "Background It has been reported that information sources searched in systematic reviews (SRs) are insufficiently comprehensive. We analyzed information sources used in SRs, as well as how up-to-date were the searches. Methods We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) through Wiley from 2012 to 2016 to find SRs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the field of anesthesiology and pain. We analyzed information sources used and search dates. Results We analyzed 674 SRs, including 374 non-Cochrane SRs (NCSRs) and 300 Cochrane reviews. The most commonly searched electronic databases reported in all included SRs were Embase (88.6%), MEDLINE (78.3%), CENTRAL (76.1%), CINAHL (29.1%), and PubMed (30.9%). In 303 (45%) SRs, authors reported that they searched clinical trial registries; 57 (8.5%) reported that they searched for unpublished data, 184 (27.3%) searched grey literature, 51 (7.6%) searched citations, and 546 (81%) searched references of included studies. A substantial amount of Cochrane reviews searched clinical trial registries (75.7%), compared with NCSRs (20.3%). Search date was reported in 647 SRs (96.1%). The median time between the last search date and publication for the SRs that reported search date was 10 months. For the NCSRs, median time between the last search and publication date was significantly higher compared with Cochrane reviews. Nonreporting of search date was more prevalent in NCSRs. Conclusion SRs in the field of anesthesiology and pain often neglect to search all possible information sources, particularly in NCSRs. Cochrane reviews had more comprehensive searching and shorter search to publication time." @default.
- W3199940272 created "2021-09-27" @default.
- W3199940272 creator A5040327296 @default.
- W3199940272 creator A5049745259 @default.
- W3199940272 creator A5049985810 @default.
- W3199940272 creator A5072353537 @default.
- W3199940272 date "2019-11-24" @default.
- W3199940272 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
- W3199940272 title "Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain" @default.
- W3199940272 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W3199940272 type Work @default.
- W3199940272 sameAs 3199940272 @default.
- W3199940272 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3199940272 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3199940272 hasAuthorship W3199940272A5040327296 @default.
- W3199940272 hasAuthorship W3199940272A5049745259 @default.
- W3199940272 hasAuthorship W3199940272A5049985810 @default.
- W3199940272 hasAuthorship W3199940272A5072353537 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C118552586 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C126322002 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C168563851 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C17744445 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C189708586 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C199539241 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C27415008 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C2776478404 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C2779473830 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C2781145037 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C71924100 @default.
- W3199940272 hasConceptScore W3199940272C95190672 @default.
- W3199940272 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W3199940272 hasOpenAccess W3199940272 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2042925898 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2065897303 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2081776835 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2094643652 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2112459694 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2112824763 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2187497345 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2204277799 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2375131417 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2412824571 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2573873216 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2588165446 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2774736760 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2791216584 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2791394282 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W28727866 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2883755901 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W2968987404 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W3048480974 @default.
- W3199940272 hasRelatedWork W3084616152 @default.
- W3199940272 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W3199940272 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3199940272 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3199940272 magId "3199940272" @default.
- W3199940272 workType "article" @default.