Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3200437654> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3200437654 endingPage "202" @default.
- W3200437654 startingPage "190" @default.
- W3200437654 abstract "<h2>Abstract</h2> The clinical application of prediction models is increasing within the field of gynaecology and obstetrics. This is mostly due to the fact that clinicians and patients prefer individualized counselling and person specific, more objective outcome assessment. To prevent using inadequate models, it is important to construct and perform prediction model studies correctly. Therefore, the TRIPOD statement (the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis) was developed. The aim of this review is to obtain an overview of the existing published prediction models for benign gynaecology and to investigate to what extent these studies meet the TRIPOD criteria. We performed a literature search in the databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to August 2020. Searching the cross-references of the relevant studies within our search identified additional articles. Publications were included if the aim of the study was to develop a multivariable prediction model within the field of benign gynaecology. Two independent reviewers extracted the data. Analysis of the studies was performed by using a checklist derived from the TRIPOD criteria. Based on our search, 2487 studies were selected, including potential duplications. Eventually, a total of twenty-two studies were selected. 91% of these studies handled their predictors by univariable analysis before developing a multivariable prediction model. Fifteen studies described having missing data, but not all of them (9%) handled these missing data. Four different internal validation methods were used in twenty studies. Fifteen studies (68%) had prediction models with a C-index ≥ 0.7, which indicates a good model. Half of the studies (50%) did not measure the calibration, overall performance was described in two studies (9%). External validation was performed in 9% of the studies. The correct development of a prediction model within benign gynaecology and subsequent transparent reporting of the model development is important to facilitate clinical use. Without transparent reporting, wrong assumptions can be made leading to incorrect application of a specific prediction model. This overview shows that excepting carrying out an external validation, only one article met all the criteria. Therefore, we strongly recommend use of the TRIPOD criteria for developing and validating a prediction model (study). In addition, prior to publication, content experts should critically and statistically review the prediction model. If too many criteria are not met, refusing publication should be considered." @default.
- W3200437654 created "2021-09-27" @default.
- W3200437654 creator A5013290340 @default.
- W3200437654 creator A5021742371 @default.
- W3200437654 creator A5024530804 @default.
- W3200437654 creator A5070326791 @default.
- W3200437654 creator A5074628732 @default.
- W3200437654 date "2021-10-01" @default.
- W3200437654 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W3200437654 title "Prediction models in gynaecology: Transparent reporting needed for clinical application" @default.
- W3200437654 cites W1144300234 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W1899096956 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W1945494843 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W1983517691 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W1994682257 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W1997192661 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W1998392635 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2001329394 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2007783027 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2011744517 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2039732919 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2041769796 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2042987963 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2061273963 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2063434807 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2066315241 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2075937340 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2084164487 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2092139013 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2098026442 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2099662638 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2103698168 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2109325327 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2111074581 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2112339374 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2124704085 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2136827198 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2146404132 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2151056789 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2154286581 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2159410320 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2168924589 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2175627054 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2285802659 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2333595774 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2576484158 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2802734008 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2886483488 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2896932538 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2896973113 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2903483444 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2907638671 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2947171094 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W2991742128 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W3014876418 @default.
- W3200437654 cites W4321428130 @default.
- W3200437654 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.013" @default.
- W3200437654 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34509878" @default.
- W3200437654 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3200437654 type Work @default.
- W3200437654 sameAs 3200437654 @default.
- W3200437654 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W3200437654 countsByYear W32004376542022 @default.
- W3200437654 countsByYear W32004376542023 @default.
- W3200437654 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3200437654 hasAuthorship W3200437654A5013290340 @default.
- W3200437654 hasAuthorship W3200437654A5021742371 @default.
- W3200437654 hasAuthorship W3200437654A5024530804 @default.
- W3200437654 hasAuthorship W3200437654A5070326791 @default.
- W3200437654 hasAuthorship W3200437654A5074628732 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConcept C10885799 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConceptScore W3200437654C10885799 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConceptScore W3200437654C131872663 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConceptScore W3200437654C19527891 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConceptScore W3200437654C2779234561 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConceptScore W3200437654C29456083 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConceptScore W3200437654C54355233 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConceptScore W3200437654C71924100 @default.
- W3200437654 hasConceptScore W3200437654C86803240 @default.
- W3200437654 hasLocation W32004376541 @default.
- W3200437654 hasOpenAccess W3200437654 @default.
- W3200437654 hasPrimaryLocation W32004376541 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2037859604 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2081538305 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2164323461 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2331886255 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2371925832 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2391778245 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2409591283 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2783428915 @default.
- W3200437654 hasRelatedWork W2789448498 @default.