FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3200528091> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3200528091 endingPage "147" @default.
• W3200528091 startingPage "142" @default.
• W3200528091 abstract "AbstractBackground The COVID-19 pandemic has compelled a global shift in healthcare service delivery towards virtualisation, including in Neurosurgery. Our study aims to elucidate the patient and neurosurgeon perceptions of virtual neurosurgery consultations (VNCs) and formulate a guidance algorithm based on our experience.Methods Between June 2020 and December 2020, we prospectively surveyed patients and neurosurgeons following their VNCs using a 10-item survey (four qualitative and six five-point Likert scale questions). Non-parametric hypothesis testing and grounded coding with inter-coder agreement was used to analyse quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.Results 106 patients and 10 neurosurgeons completed the survey. Wilcoxon rank-sum test revealed a statistically significant difference between the neurosurgeon and patient responses (p < 0.001). Patients perceived VNCs benefits to be enhanced efficiency (n = 142) and communication (28); and VNCs drawbacks as safety (46), technological (32), and administration (15) issues. Neurosurgeons perceived VNCs benefits to be enhanced efficiency (13), reduced COVID-19 exposure (2); and VNCs drawbacks as examination practicality (14), technological (6), and concerns for patients (6). Neurosurgeons perceived the relative indications for VNCs as postoperative follow-up clinics, and scan result discussions; and relative contraindications as neuro-oncology, new patients, and patients with worsening neurological symptoms.Conclusions Our mirror-survey study provides preliminary evidence that VNCs render increased efficiency, communication, and safety in the current COVID-19 era. Going forward, we believe that further improvements in technology and administration are necessary, greater neurosurgeon appreciation of the patient-perceived benefits of VNCs is required, and neurosurgeons are to exercise clinical discernment on when to use VNCs.Key PointsWhat are the perceptions of patient and consultant neurosurgeons towards virtual neurosurgery consultations (VNCs)?Patient-perceived benefits of VNCs: enhanced efficiency/communication; VNC drawbacks: safety, technological, and administration issues. Neurosurgeon-perceived VNCs benefits of VNCs: enhanced efficiency, reduced COVID-19 exposure; VNC drawbacks: examination practicality, technological, and concerns for patients.Post-operative reviews and scan result discussions are perceived relative indications for VNCs; whereas new patient consultations, neuro-oncology and patients with new-onset neurological deficits are perceived relative contraindications for VNCs.Improvement in technology and administration is necessary; greater neurosurgeon appreciation of patient-perceived VNCs benefits is required, and neurosurgeons are to exercise clinical discernment on when to use VNCs.Keywords: COVID-19neurosurgeryvirtualisationtelemedicine Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s)." @default.
• W3200528091 created "2021-09-27" @default.
• W3200528091 creator A5010504151 @default.
• W3200528091 creator A5068380047 @default.
• W3200528091 creator A5069292933 @default.
• W3200528091 creator A5070020318 @default.
• W3200528091 date "2021-09-21" @default.
• W3200528091 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3200528091 title "Evaluating patient and neurosurgeon perspectives on virtualisation of neurosurgery clinics in the COVID-19 era: a prospective mirror survey study" @default.
• W3200528091 cites W1927891629 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W1973770513 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W2012938070 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W2294067774 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W2410042140 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W2738430949 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W2795761008 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W2799535425 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W2801930289 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W2955926508 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3001493106 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3015345229 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3016966570 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3022309725 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3024652151 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3025861116 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3026697974 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3043255610 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3045389117 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3082874150 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3092090431 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3092556924 @default.
• W3200528091 cites W3131046479 @default.
• W3200528091 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2021.1979192" @default.
• W3200528091 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34546116" @default.
• W3200528091 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3200528091 type Work @default.
• W3200528091 sameAs 3200528091 @default.
• W3200528091 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3200528091 countsByYear W32005280912022 @default.
• W3200528091 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3200528091 hasAuthorship W3200528091A5010504151 @default.
• W3200528091 hasAuthorship W3200528091A5068380047 @default.
• W3200528091 hasAuthorship W3200528091A5069292933 @default.
• W3200528091 hasAuthorship W3200528091A5070020318 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C12770488 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C105776082 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C12770488 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C138496976 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C141071460 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C15744967 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C160735492 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C162324750 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C19527891 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C2779891985 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C50522688 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C512399662 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C545542383 @default.
• W3200528091 hasConceptScore W3200528091C71924100 @default.
• W3200528091 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3200528091 hasLocation W32005280911 @default.
• W3200528091 hasLocation W32005280912 @default.
• W3200528091 hasOpenAccess W3200528091 @default.
• W3200528091 hasPrimaryLocation W32005280911 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W1972431767 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W2094848803 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W2177495584 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W2541239117 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W2908319631 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W2910900023 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W3033861099 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W4220995754 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W4224105819 @default.
• W3200528091 hasRelatedWork W4289528397 @default.
• W3200528091 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W3200528091 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3200528091 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3200528091 magId "3200528091" @default.
• W3200528091 workType "article" @default.