FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3200921291> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3200921291 abstract "Within the broad field of word formation not only in English but also in other languages, derivation has been observed to be a regular and productive morphological process. Common examples of English derivational patterns and suffixes include –ness which when added to an adjective (slow) changes to a noun (slowness). Derivation that occurs in a noun may be called nominalization and it may involve the use of affixes which include common English examples such as employ employee. However, not much study in derivation has been done in this field particularly in the language in question; Kigiryama.This paper aimed at analyzing Noun derivation in Kigiryama using Aronoff’s Word formation theory and the Extended Level Ordering Hypothesis. Despite the general popularity in current morphological research, it is still an issue of lively debate whether the word is the sole locus of word formation. Shibatani and Kageyama (1988) argue that a new type of noun –verb compound formation is attested in Japanese which involves a sentential structure as its input and presumably takes place in the phonological component. This post syntactic compounding serves to elucidate problems surrounding the delicate and controversial issue of where word formation processes take place. This paper aims at contributing to that debate of whether word formation is word based or morpheme based. This paper while discussing noun derivation within the framework of Aronoff's Word Formation Theory and the Extended level Ordering hypothesis, it also tests the extent to which Aronoff's Word Formation theory (a word based theory) can explain the morphological word formation processes in Kigiryama. This paper was set to address the following objectives:- To identify and describe the noun derivational processes in Kigiryama To formulate the rules governing these processes To assess the extent to which Aronoff’s Word formation Theory and the Extended Level Ordering Hypothesis can account for the noun derivation processes in Kigiryama. The study employed the use of focus group discussions and open ended questions. The focus group discussions (FGDs) comprised of Agiryama males and females aged 18 to 35 years. Data from the FGDs was analyzed transcribed, reviewed and coded to bring meaning and to write the rules of the word formation processes that are stipulated in the objectives of the study. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the application of the theory. The findings of this study show that affixation process in Kigiryama can to a large extent be accounted for within the Word Formation Theory, while compounding can be accounted for within the Extended Level Ordering Hypothesis, and contrary to predictions of Aronoff that word formation rules operate solely over words this is not the case in Kigiryama, that they can operate over morphemes and groups of words like phrases.(e.g the Kigiryama adjective morpheme –ii-) which means ‘wicked’ can be used to formulate the abstract noun uwi which means ‘wickedness’and the compound word mutumui which means ‘a wicked person’." @default.
• W3200921291 created "2021-09-27" @default.
• W3200921291 creator A5024685254 @default.
• W3200921291 date "2021-06-30" @default.
• W3200921291 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3200921291 title "Noun Derivations in Kigiryama Using Aronoff’s Word Formation Theory" @default.
• W3200921291 doi "https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i6/hs2106-002" @default.
• W3200921291 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3200921291 type Work @default.
• W3200921291 sameAs 3200921291 @default.
• W3200921291 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3200921291 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3200921291 hasAuthorship W3200921291A5024685254 @default.
• W3200921291 hasBestOaLocation W32009212911 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C121934690 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C122295659 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C165297611 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C2776397901 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C2777509023 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C2777683214 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C121934690 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C122295659 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C138885662 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C165297611 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C2776397901 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C2777509023 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C2777683214 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C33923547 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C41008148 @default.
• W3200921291 hasConceptScore W3200921291C41895202 @default.
• W3200921291 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3200921291 hasLocation W32009212911 @default.
• W3200921291 hasOpenAccess W3200921291 @default.
• W3200921291 hasPrimaryLocation W32009212911 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W1563500367 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W1613655505 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W2039158745 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W2357972312 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W2372617448 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W2796206592 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W2805667813 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W2919915173 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W3094489484 @default.
• W3200921291 hasRelatedWork W2201478077 @default.
• W3200921291 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W3200921291 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3200921291 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3200921291 magId "3200921291" @default.
• W3200921291 workType "article" @default.