FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3201009922> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3201009922 endingPage "e31616" @default.
• W3201009922 startingPage "e31616" @default.
• W3201009922 abstract "Therapeutic decision-making in oncology is a complex process because physicians must consider many forms of medical data and protocols. Another challenge for physicians is to clearly communicate their decision-making process to patients to ensure informed consent. Computer-based decision tools have the potential to play a valuable role in supporting this process.This systematic review aims to investigate the extent to which computer-based decision tools have been successfully adopted in oncology consultations to improve patient-physician joint therapeutic decision-making.This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist and guidelines. A literature search was conducted on February 4, 2021, across the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (from 2005 to January 28, 2021), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (December 2020), MEDLINE (from 1946 to February 4, 2021), Embase (from 1947 to February 4, 2021), Web of Science (from 1900 to 2021), Scopus (from 1969 to 2021), and PubMed (from 1991 to 2021). We used a snowball approach to identify additional studies by searching the reference lists of the studies included for full-text review. Additional supplementary searches of relevant journals and gray literature websites were conducted. The reviewers screened the articles eligible for review for quality and inclusion before data extraction.There are relatively few studies looking at the use of computer-based decision tools in oncology consultations. Of the 4431 unique articles obtained from the searches, only 10 (0.22%) satisfied the selection criteria. From the 10 selected studies, 8 computer-based decision tools were identified. Of the 10 studies, 6 (60%) were conducted in the United States. Communication and information-sharing were improved between physicians and patients. However, physicians did not change their habits to take advantage of computer-assisted decision-making tools or the information they provide. On average, the use of these computer-based decision tools added approximately 5 minutes to the total length of consultations. In addition, some physicians felt that the technology increased patients' anxiety.Of the 10 selected studies, 6 (60%) demonstrated positive outcomes, 1 (10%) showed negative results, and 3 (30%) were neutral. Adoption of computer-based decision tools during oncology consultations continues to be low. This review shows that information-sharing and communication between physicians and patients can be improved with the assistance of technology. However, the lack of integration with electronic health records is a barrier. This review provides key requirements for enhancing the chance of success of future computer-based decision tools. However, it does not show the effects of health care policies, regulations, or business administration on physicians' propensity to adopt the technology. Nevertheless, it is important that future research address the influence of these higher-level factors as well.PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021226087; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021226087." @default.
• W3201009922 created "2021-09-27" @default.
• W3201009922 creator A5018800355 @default.
• W3201009922 creator A5050521291 @default.
• W3201009922 creator A5056466058 @default.
• W3201009922 creator A5085056759 @default.
• W3201009922 creator A5089667244 @default.
• W3201009922 date "2021-10-26" @default.
• W3201009922 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3201009922 title "Computer-Based Decision Tools for Shared Therapeutic Decision-making in Oncology: Systematic Review" @default.
• W3201009922 cites W1797349358 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W1965047802 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W1985605499 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W1990677988 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W1994682895 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2007818805 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2019268112 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2034270752 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2040607890 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2069340802 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2071825164 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2085260519 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2086254292 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2099846354 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2107318542 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2475260156 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2521442345 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2531269403 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2567362164 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2582643618 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2589595060 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2737292476 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2743697402 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2798513298 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2805750075 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2805765565 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2889346090 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2889467857 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2895839646 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2896560148 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2914531051 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2937687211 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2944384761 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2961035524 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2967599871 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2970684805 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2980912444 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2981052139 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W2997643461 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W3004741387 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W3045593930 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W3089309273 @default.
• W3201009922 cites W3123893780 @default.
• W3201009922 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/31616" @default.
• W3201009922 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8579220" @default.
• W3201009922 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34544680" @default.
• W3201009922 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3201009922 type Work @default.
• W3201009922 sameAs 3201009922 @default.
• W3201009922 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W3201009922 countsByYear W32010099222022 @default.
• W3201009922 countsByYear W32010099222023 @default.
• W3201009922 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3201009922 hasAuthorship W3201009922A5018800355 @default.
• W3201009922 hasAuthorship W3201009922A5050521291 @default.
• W3201009922 hasAuthorship W3201009922A5056466058 @default.
• W3201009922 hasAuthorship W3201009922A5085056759 @default.
• W3201009922 hasAuthorship W3201009922A5089667244 @default.
• W3201009922 hasBestOaLocation W32010099221 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C2777466982 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C2780033181 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C126322002 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C142724271 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C143998085 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C15744967 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C17744445 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C180747234 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C189708586 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C199539241 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C204787440 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C2777466982 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C2779356329 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C2779473830 @default.
• W3201009922 hasConceptScore W3201009922C2780033181 @default.

• next