FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3201721874> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3201721874 endingPage "4084" @default.
• W3201721874 startingPage "4071" @default.
• W3201721874 abstract "Purpose Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are faced with the challenge of quickly and accurately identifying children who present with speech sound disorders (SSD) compared to typically developing (TD) children. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical relevance of two speech sampling methods (single-word vs. connected speech samples) in how sensitive they are in detecting atypical speech sound development in children, and to know whether the information obtained from single-word samples is representative enough of children's overall speech sound performance. Method We compared the speech sound performance of 37 preschool children with SSD (Mage = 4;11 years) and 37 age-sex-matched typically developing children (Mage = 5;0 years) by eliciting their speech in two ways: (a) a picture-naming task to elicit single words, and (b) a story-retelling task to elicit connected speech. Four speech measures were compared across sample type (single words vs. connected speech) and across groups (SSD vs. TD): intelligibility, speech accuracy, phonemic inventory, and phonological patterns. Results Interaction effects were found between sample type and group on several speech sound performance measures. Single-word speech samples were found to differentiate the SSD group from the TD group, and were more sensitive than connected speech samples across various measures. The effect size of single-word samples was consistently higher than connected speech samples for three measures: intelligibility, speech accuracy, and phonemic inventory. The gap in sample type informativeness may be attributed to salience and avoidance effects, given that children tend to avoid producing unfamiliar phonemes in connected speech. The number of phonological patterns produced was the only measure that revealed no gap between two sampling types for both groups. Conclusions On measures of intelligibility, speech accuracy, and phonemic inventory, obtaining a single-word sample proved to be a more informative method of differentiating children with SSD from TD children than connected speech samples. This finding may guide SLPs in their choice of sampling type when they are under time pressure. We discuss how children's performance on the connected speech sample may be biased by salience and avoidance effects and/or task design, and may, therefore, not necessarily reveal a poorer performance than single-word samples, particularly in intelligibility, speech accuracy, and the number of phonological patterns, if these task limitations are circumvented. Our findings show that the performance gap, typically observed between the two sampling types, largely depends on which performance measures are evaluated with the speech sample. Our study is the first to address sampling type differences in SSD versus TD children and has significant clinical implications for SLPs looking for sampling types and measures that reliably identify SSD in preschool-aged children." @default.
• W3201721874 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3201721874 creator A5020129162 @default.
• W3201721874 creator A5051552933 @default.
• W3201721874 date "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3201721874 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3201721874 title "Comparing the Informativeness of Single-Word Samples and Connected Speech Samples in Assessing Speech Sound Disorders" @default.
• W3201721874 cites W178311199 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1903574030 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1972205618 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1975667144 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1985180003 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1989145470 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1989743657 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1997612867 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1997961820 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W1999465661 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2001837835 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2005975964 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2020255041 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2030889511 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2042300258 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2043112869 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2045265276 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2053421158 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2061865352 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2062936103 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2063742822 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2064040919 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2079851350 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2083624773 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2085581407 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2090351498 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2102452974 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2122042796 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2471087218 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2749837051 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2763526717 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2839822191 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2916279055 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2947373951 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W2965593879 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W3010830605 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W3027481352 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W3031944476 @default.
• W3201721874 cites W4236129835 @default.
• W3201721874 doi "https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00172" @default.
• W3201721874 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34618552" @default.
• W3201721874 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3201721874 type Work @default.
• W3201721874 sameAs 3201721874 @default.
• W3201721874 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3201721874 countsByYear W32017218742022 @default.
• W3201721874 countsByYear W32017218742023 @default.
• W3201721874 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3201721874 hasAuthorship W3201721874A5020129162 @default.
• W3201721874 hasAuthorship W3201721874A5051552933 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C108154423 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C2777003509 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C3018392663 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C60048801 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C108154423 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C111472728 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C138885662 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C15744967 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C180747234 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C2777003509 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C28490314 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C3018392663 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C41008148 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C548259974 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C60048801 @default.
• W3201721874 hasConceptScore W3201721874C71924100 @default.
• W3201721874 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W3201721874 hasLocation W32017218741 @default.
• W3201721874 hasLocation W32017218742 @default.
• W3201721874 hasOpenAccess W3201721874 @default.
• W3201721874 hasPrimaryLocation W32017218741 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W1968404103 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W1974487811 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W2014405808 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W2015116309 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W2059338466 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W2070767941 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W2133735030 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W2152588959 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W2396425168 @default.
• W3201721874 hasRelatedWork W2399331142 @default.
• W3201721874 hasVolume "64" @default.
• W3201721874 isParatext "false" @default.

• next