FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3202287462> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3202287462 endingPage "103283" @default.
• W3202287462 startingPage "103283" @default.
• W3202287462 abstract "Vegetable production is highly dependent on chemical fertilisers and pesticides, but the intensive use of these inputs negatively impacts the environment and human health. Ecological Intensification (EI) has the potential to counter the adverse effects of agricultural intensification and improve sustainability. Despite the potential benefits of EI for the environment, the adoption rate of EI in vegetable production is low. Moreover, most studies on EI adoption focus on implementing a single farming practice or a single production stage. This article aims to empirically analyse what factors influence the simultaneous adoption of various EI practices in different vegetable crop production stages by farmers in the context of an emerging economy such as Chile. Further, since the literature on EI practices adoption mainly analyses these factors as separate from each other, we aim to explore the interactions between factors and how these jointly impact the application of EI practices. We collected data via a survey to vegetable growers in the central zone in Chile. First, we measure EI practices adoption through a farm-level index that reflects the sustainability of farming practices in five production stages. Second, we identify which factors affect EI practices adoption through multiple linear regressions. Third, based on the results of the previous steps, we carried out a literature review to see how the factors predicting the adoption of EI could interact. This analysis was performed using structural equation modelling. Our results show that being a woman, receiving training on EI practices, and being pro-environment positively affect EI practices adoption. Contrarily, obstacles include the perception of risk and barriers, better access to credit and higher income from farm activities, all of which negatively affect EI practices adoption. With reference to the interaction amongst the factors, we found that economic resources, trust and training are the major factors affecting the perception of risk and barriers amongst Chilean farmers when it comes to adopting EI practices. Embracing a broad perspective, including different farming practices and production stages, allowed us to offer insights into the complex processes of adopting EI practices. Identifying which factors are important and how these factors interact with each other, contributes to the debate on whatpolicymakers and scholars need to focus in order to increase the use rate of EI practices. • We analyse EI practices adoption as a gradual process, encompassing different farming practices and production stages. • The study is based on an extensive survey amongst vegetable farmers in the central regions of Chile. • Factors were analyzed individually and between them in a systematic way to measure the impact on EI adoption. • Women in rural communities prove to play a crucial role when it comes to foster EI practices adoption. • Economic resources, trust and training influence farmers' perception of risk and barriers when it comes to EI adoption." @default.
• W3202287462 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3202287462 creator A5011409022 @default.
• W3202287462 creator A5044900728 @default.
• W3202287462 creator A5049368959 @default.
• W3202287462 creator A5066769778 @default.
• W3202287462 date "2021-12-01" @default.
• W3202287462 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W3202287462 title "Factors affecting the adoption of ecological intensification practices: A case study in vegetable production in Chile" @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1575617990 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1635118023 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1963529615 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1976433693 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1985382305 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1986809122 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1990675056 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1994000771 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1998456060 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W1999564261 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2001660122 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2006647242 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2008193940 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2010100330 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2012262466 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2020098592 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2021200474 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2024140722 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2030198620 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2032699248 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2035782089 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2036118375 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2044220157 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2045027778 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2055047235 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2062982578 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2064369391 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2069822216 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2075829357 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2080215109 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2098787296 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2102635680 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2105517277 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2110782980 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2122363970 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2126954158 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2128552993 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2134099106 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2134303396 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2135496174 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2136243765 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2138610738 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2139736795 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2148845923 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2153804214 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2165721685 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2170488209 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2267323898 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2279229728 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2291117140 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2301745874 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2327678559 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2345483851 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2346327216 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2594563923 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2609568909 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2620901747 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2623703952 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2766389460 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2766541464 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2792450390 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2799906767 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2885816510 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2893917082 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2929478125 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2939938200 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2972703542 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W2982679050 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3006255641 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3009778210 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3109045773 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3110344143 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3112131596 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3115235781 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3132119234 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3134900093 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3145875726 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W3157038034 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W4235678817 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W4242690609 @default.
• W3202287462 cites W4294343482 @default.
• W3202287462 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103283" @default.
• W3202287462 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3202287462 type Work @default.
• W3202287462 sameAs 3202287462 @default.
• W3202287462 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W3202287462 countsByYear W32022874622022 @default.
• W3202287462 countsByYear W32022874622023 @default.
• W3202287462 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.

• next