FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3202312694> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3202312694 abstract "Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia is the most popular procedure in the field of anesthesiology. Subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthetic technique for cesarean section, being simple to perform and economical with rapid onset. Lower incidence of failed block, less drug doses, minimal neonatal depression and decreased incidence of aspiration pneumonitis are added advantages of spinal anesthesia. Objectives The study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Fentanyl versus Nalbuphine when used with intrathecal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section as the primary objective and compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative pruritus and shivering as the secondary objectives. Methods and material After Approval was obtained from the research ethics committee of faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University and after obtaining a written informed consent. Fifty adult females underwent elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, their ages ranged between 18-45 years old and classified as ASA I and II were enrolled in the study at obstetrics and gynecology Ain Shams university hospital over 4 months. The patients were randomly divided using computer generated randomization into two groups 25patients in each (n = 25), Group A received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25 μg); Group B received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg) Results The main significant findings in this study was that fentanyl has a more rapid onset of motor block (5.63±0.25 minute in fentanyl group versus 5.88±0.19 minute in nalbuphine group), while nalbuphine produces less perioperative side effects as: shivering (7 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group), pruritis (6 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group), nausea and vomiting (5 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group). Regarding perioperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative analgesia, they were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusions We concluded that either intrathecal nalbuphine (0.8 mg) combined with (10 mg) Bupivacaine or intrathecal fentanyl (25 µg) combined with (10 mg) Bupivacaine improves intraoperative analgesia and prolongs early postoperative analgesia in cesarean section with significantly lower incidence of side effects as shivering, pruritis, nausea and vomiting in Nalbuphine." @default.
• W3202312694 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3202312694 creator A5018294656 @default.
• W3202312694 creator A5019994935 @default.
• W3202312694 creator A5057794837 @default.
• W3202312694 creator A5078954697 @default.
• W3202312694 date "2021-10-01" @default.
• W3202312694 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3202312694 title "Effectiveness of Intrathecal Administration of Bupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Nalbuphine for Elective Cesarean Section" @default.
• W3202312694 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcab086.088" @default.
• W3202312694 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3202312694 type Work @default.
• W3202312694 sameAs 3202312694 @default.
• W3202312694 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3202312694 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3202312694 hasAuthorship W3202312694A5018294656 @default.
• W3202312694 hasAuthorship W3202312694A5019994935 @default.
• W3202312694 hasAuthorship W3202312694A5057794837 @default.
• W3202312694 hasAuthorship W3202312694A5078954697 @default.
• W3202312694 hasBestOaLocation W32023126941 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C157820659 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C2778977083 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C2781063702 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C2781072394 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C2781258859 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C2781328992 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C126322002 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C141071460 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C157820659 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C170493617 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C2778977083 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C2780820201 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C2781063702 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C2781072394 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C2781258859 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C2781328992 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C42219234 @default.
• W3202312694 hasConceptScore W3202312694C71924100 @default.
• W3202312694 hasIssue "Supplement_1" @default.
• W3202312694 hasLocation W32023126941 @default.
• W3202312694 hasOpenAccess W3202312694 @default.
• W3202312694 hasPrimaryLocation W32023126941 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W1971102534 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W2030713667 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W2135387302 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W2234096785 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W2906799265 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W2937060981 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W3023166021 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W3114399829 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W3190078272 @default.
• W3202312694 hasRelatedWork W4327886412 @default.
• W3202312694 hasVolume "114" @default.
• W3202312694 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3202312694 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3202312694 magId "3202312694" @default.
• W3202312694 workType "article" @default.