FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3202335891> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3202335891 endingPage "3190" @default.
• W3202335891 startingPage "3162" @default.
• W3202335891 abstract "Purpose Corporate scandals involving senior executives plague many businesses. Although customers and noncustomers may be exposed to news of the same scandal, they may appraise dimensions of the transgression differently, thereby affecting post-scandal patronage intentions. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether and how consumer-firm affiliation affects future patronage intentions by examining nuances in customers’ vs noncustomers’ reactions toward the transgressor’s professional performance and immoral behavior. Design/methodology/approach Four between-subjects experimental studies were used to test whether performance-relevant and/or immorality-relevant pathways drive customers’ vs noncustomers’ post-scandal patronage intentions. The results were analyzed using analysis of variance, parallel mediation and serial mediation. Findings The results demonstrate that performance judgment, and not immorality judgment, drive the relationship between consumer-firm affiliation and post-scandal patronage intentions (Study 1a), regardless of the order of information presented (Study 1b). Customers form more positive performance judgments because they give more weight to performance-related information (Study 2), demonstrating a sequential effect of consumer-firm affiliation on post-scandal patronage intentions only through the performance-relevant, and not immorality-relevant, pathway (Study 3). Research limitations/implications This research contributes to the literature on social distance and moral judgments. Future research should examine other deleterious outcomes such as brand sabotage and negative word-of-mouth, as well as potential moderators including repeated transgressions and prevalence of the infraction in other firms. Practical implications This research offers important nuances for understanding how performance and immorality judgments differentially operate and affect post-scandal patronage intentions. The findings highlight the strategic value of communicating the leader’s performance (e.g. professional contributions) as a buffer against potential declining patronage. Originality/value Offering new insights into the extant literature and lay beliefs which contend that harsh moral judgment reduces patronage intentions, this research uncovers why and how exposure to the same scandal can result in varying moral judgments that subsequently influence patronage intentions. Importantly, this research shows that the performance-relevant pathway can explain why customers have higher post-scandal patronage intentions compared to noncustomers." @default.
• W3202335891 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3202335891 creator A5004546761 @default.
• W3202335891 creator A5034140725 @default.
• W3202335891 creator A5067278511 @default.
• W3202335891 date "2021-10-04" @default.
• W3202335891 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W3202335891 title "Same scandal, different moral judgments: the effects of consumer-firm affiliation on weighting transgressor-related information and post-scandal patronage intentions" @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1497758868 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1540784947 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1577283748 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1971601808 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1972258674 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1982562184 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1984964879 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1987865451 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1991703220 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W1995060057 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2014011985 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2019954397 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2022166714 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2035394806 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2064685466 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2071535931 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2076719754 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2085738682 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2089457241 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2099104144 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2100973578 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2106641236 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2112702781 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2115026942 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2123791568 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2127612390 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2142928453 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2156925274 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2158840443 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2168055557 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2262553232 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2263972108 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2329537810 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2603418839 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2789388691 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2803355815 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W2976626809 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W3004028869 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W3087129113 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W3121586804 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W3122423361 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W3123281670 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W4247253348 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W4249660506 @default.
• W3202335891 cites W4376595460 @default.
• W3202335891 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2020-0728" @default.
• W3202335891 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3202335891 type Work @default.
• W3202335891 sameAs 3202335891 @default.
• W3202335891 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3202335891 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3202335891 hasAuthorship W3202335891A5004546761 @default.
• W3202335891 hasAuthorship W3202335891A5034140725 @default.
• W3202335891 hasAuthorship W3202335891A5067278511 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C119232533 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C179420905 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C196083921 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C200113983 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C2777433734 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C2778813691 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C10138342 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C112698675 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C119232533 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C121955636 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C144133560 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C15744967 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C162853370 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C17744445 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C179420905 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C182306322 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C196083921 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C199539241 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C200113983 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C2776035688 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C2777433734 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C2778813691 @default.
• W3202335891 hasConceptScore W3202335891C39549134 @default.

• next