FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3202492172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3202492172 endingPage "988" @default.
• W3202492172 startingPage "988" @default.
• W3202492172 abstract "2 years ago your Editorial staff and International Advisory Board took the courageous and correct step to criticise the practices of your parent company, Reed Elsevier, in the hosting of arms trade fairs.1The Lancet and The Lancet Editorial Advisory BoardReed Elsevier and the arms trade.Lancet. 2005; 366: 868Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (21) Google ScholarThe arms trade industry as it stands has little good to say for itself. It encourages transgressions of the various Geneva Conventions on the conduct of war, wastes public money, catalyses conflict and war, institutionalises corruption, glorifies violence, sustains oppressive and genocidal regimes, and excuses the conduct of torture.Reed Elsevier is undoubtedly associated with these reprehensible aspects of the arms industry, and by association, so is The Lancet. Your request to Reed Elsevier to “divest itself of all business interests that threaten human, and especially civilian, health and wellbeing” has clearly been ignored.We therefore write to express our support of your position on this issue and to say that we will be asking Reed Elsevier directly to get out of this sordid industry and instead align itself to the values and principles espoused by The Lancet. 2 years ago your Editorial staff and International Advisory Board took the courageous and correct step to criticise the practices of your parent company, Reed Elsevier, in the hosting of arms trade fairs.1The Lancet and The Lancet Editorial Advisory BoardReed Elsevier and the arms trade.Lancet. 2005; 366: 868Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (21) Google Scholar The arms trade industry as it stands has little good to say for itself. It encourages transgressions of the various Geneva Conventions on the conduct of war, wastes public money, catalyses conflict and war, institutionalises corruption, glorifies violence, sustains oppressive and genocidal regimes, and excuses the conduct of torture. Reed Elsevier is undoubtedly associated with these reprehensible aspects of the arms industry, and by association, so is The Lancet. Your request to Reed Elsevier to “divest itself of all business interests that threaten human, and especially civilian, health and wellbeing” has clearly been ignored. We therefore write to express our support of your position on this issue and to say that we will be asking Reed Elsevier directly to get out of this sordid industry and instead align itself to the values and principles espoused by The Lancet. Reed Elsevier and the arms trade revisited – The Editors of The Lancet replyWe are very concerned, once again, by the issue of arms fairs and the adverse effects this industry has on civilian public health. We are also concerned about the damage that is being done to The Lancet's reputation because of the association underlined by our correspondents here—namely, the organisation of arms exhibitions by Reed Elsevier, the current owners of The Lancet. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W3202492172 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5000049458 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5003673584 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5006227092 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5007718283 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5017766759 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5020515529 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5030618844 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5032338025 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5036453478 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5044582512 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5044952796 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5047611349 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5047758195 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5048046906 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5048762874 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5055624967 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5069080391 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5073914270 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5079792938 @default.
• W3202492172 creator A5085567137 @default.
• W3202492172 date "2007-03-01" @default.
• W3202492172 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3202492172 title "Reed Elsevier and the arms trade revisited" @default.
• W3202492172 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60487-5" @default.
• W3202492172 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17382817" @default.
• W3202492172 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W3202492172 type Work @default.
• W3202492172 sameAs 3202492172 @default.
• W3202492172 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3202492172 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5000049458 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5003673584 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5006227092 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5007718283 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5017766759 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5020515529 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5030618844 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5032338025 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5036453478 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5044582512 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5044952796 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5047611349 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5047758195 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5048046906 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5048762874 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5055624967 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5069080391 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5073914270 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5079792938 @default.
• W3202492172 hasAuthorship W3202492172A5085567137 @default.
• W3202492172 hasBestOaLocation W32024921721 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConcept C544040105 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConceptScore W3202492172C162324750 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConceptScore W3202492172C169437150 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConceptScore W3202492172C17744445 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConceptScore W3202492172C187736073 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConceptScore W3202492172C199539241 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConceptScore W3202492172C2779473830 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConceptScore W3202492172C544040105 @default.
• W3202492172 hasConceptScore W3202492172C83867959 @default.
• W3202492172 hasIssue "9566" @default.
• W3202492172 hasLocation W32024921721 @default.
• W3202492172 hasLocation W32024921722 @default.
• W3202492172 hasOpenAccess W3202492172 @default.
• W3202492172 hasPrimaryLocation W32024921721 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W1560309000 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W2004655998 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W2118147136 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W2161270170 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W2531441365 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W2624865555 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W3121801568 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W3122027763 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W3123833789 @default.
• W3202492172 hasRelatedWork W4231593087 @default.
• W3202492172 hasVolume "369" @default.
• W3202492172 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3202492172 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3202492172 magId "3202492172" @default.
• W3202492172 workType "article" @default.