FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3202653367> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3202653367 abstract "Yellowstone holds a special place inAmerica’s heart - a young nation’s Eden - and the crown-jewel ofmodern preservation. As the world’s first national park, it isglobally recognized as the prototype of natural purity andgoodness. But in recent decades, Yellowstone and its surroundingareas have become a lightning rod for environmental controversy, anarea plagued by social disunity and intractable politicalstruggle. Science and policy efforts areespecially protracted in the GYE, involving hundreds of diverseinterest-organizations, dozens of state agencies, three separatestate governments, hundreds-of-thousands of local residents, andmillions of concerned Americans. Accordingly, management decisionsin the GYE rely on a hyper-rationalized form of governance thatprivileges technical facts, scientific analysis of nature,bureaucratic administration, and legal formalism. This raises thefollowing puzzle: why, with the flood of expert scientific, legal,economic, and political efforts to resolve disagreements overYellowstone, are matters not improving? Despite all of theseefforts, why do even the most minor issues still recurrently eruptinto impassioned and long-lasting disputes? Myargument is that this modern obsession with scientific, legal, andeconomic reasoning misses out on deeper cultural mechanisms drivingthe conflict in the first place. Put more specifically, I arguethat any sociological account of this conflict should be built upona more empirically accurate and philosophically sophisticated modelof human persons and cultures, that does not presuppose narrow ordeterministic motivational frameworks, but understands that the“why,” in the end, is a question of morality - perhaps even“spirituality” - stemming from our lived experiences as part ofhuman cultures, shaped by narratives and moral orders that tell usmost fundamentally who we are, why we are, what we should do, andwhy it all matters. Drawing on work in cultural sociology and moraltheory to make this argument. I reorient our attention to the sortsof “whys”‘ that make life meaningful for different cultures, andpropel them forward toward particular ends, and not other ends.These are the sorts of answers to the “why” questions that we needto incorporate into our theories and methods if we hope to improveour understanding of the human-environment relationship moregenerally. My sociological approach focusesless on the individuals themselves, and more on the cultural,moral, and spiritual contexts in which stakeholders are embedded,shaping their beliefs and desires. Somewhat implicit in my argumentis that, for a variety of reasons, these deeper moral and spiritualmeanings are often ignored, muted, and misunderstood. But onlyuntil we engage these sorts of questions at a much deeper level canwe begin to understand why the mountains of technical evidencemarshaled in the Yellowstone conflict have done little to solvedisputes that are, finally, not about the facts themselves, butabout what make the…" @default.
• W3202653367 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3202653367 creator A5037522689 @default.
• W3202653367 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W3202653367 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3202653367 title "The Battle for Yellowstone: Morality and the Sacred Roots ofEnvironmental Conflict" @default.
• W3202653367 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W3202653367 type Work @default.
• W3202653367 sameAs 3202653367 @default.
• W3202653367 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3202653367 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3202653367 hasAuthorship W3202653367A5037522689 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C200113983 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConcept C95124753 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C138885662 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C144024400 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C17744445 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C190253527 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C199539241 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C200113983 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C51575053 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C94625758 @default.
• W3202653367 hasConceptScore W3202653367C95124753 @default.
• W3202653367 hasLocation W32026533671 @default.
• W3202653367 hasOpenAccess W3202653367 @default.
• W3202653367 hasPrimaryLocation W32026533671 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W121134769 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W1514674552 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W151663236 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2026254081 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2042673350 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2088457456 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W209172447 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2101329342 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2198520286 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2499134730 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W266835966 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W278647320 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2791959203 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2795030218 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W302064959 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W3119941894 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W591178364 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W81483981 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2556553167 @default.
• W3202653367 hasRelatedWork W2602172665 @default.
• W3202653367 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3202653367 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3202653367 magId "3202653367" @default.
• W3202653367 workType "article" @default.