Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3202744758> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 99 of
99
with 100 items per page.
- W3202744758 endingPage "88" @default.
- W3202744758 startingPage "83" @default.
- W3202744758 abstract "Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is essential for the treatment of metastatic germ cell tumours of the testis. Recommendations on the referral and management of complex urological cancers in the UK includes centralisation of services to regional centres. To review contemporary PC-RPLND outcomes at a high-volume centre with a complex case-mix, and compare with national registry data. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of PC-RPLNDs performed for germ cell tumours at our centre between July 2012 and September 2018. Primary outcomes were Clavien 3+ complications, histology, rates of positive margin, relapse, in-field recurrences, and mortality. Secondary outcomes were blood loss, operation time, blood transfusion, adjuvant procedures, length of stay, and lymph node count. Surgical and histological outcomes of all RPLNDs for testicular cancers were compared with national RPLND registry data. For statistical difference, χ2 testing was used. A total of 178 procedures were performed, including 31 (17%) redo RPLNDs. Clavien 3+ complications occurred in 11 (7%). Histological findings in non-redo cases were the following: necrosis 24%, teratoma 62%, viable germ cell tumour 11%, and dedifferentiated cancers 3%. Rates of positive margin, relapse, and in-field recurrence were 11%, 17%, and 2%, respectively. Overall survival was 89% at a median of 36 mo. The median blood loss was 650 ml (350, 1250), with a transfusion rate of 8%. Nephrectomy, vascular reconstruction, and visceral resection was required in 12%, 6%, and 3% respectively. The median inpatient stay was 6 d (5, 8) and the median node count was 35 (20, 37). A comparison of all RPLNDs with national data showed no statistical difference in primary outcomes. Our blood transfusion rate was significantly lower (12% vs 21%, χ2 [1, N = 322] = 4.296, p = 0.038). Centralisation led to high quality of RPLND in UK. Within that, our series (the largest in the UK) demonstrates no significant difference in outcomes despite higher complexity cases. Our blood transfusion rates are in fact lower than national figures. Complex RPLNDs should be performed in high-volume centres where possible. In the UK, retroperitoneal lymph node dissections (RPLND) are centralised to specialist centres and the quality of surgery is high, with low complications and good histological outcomes. When compared to national data, we found no significant difference in the majority of outcomes from our high-volume centre despite our complex case-mix." @default.
- W3202744758 created "2021-10-11" @default.
- W3202744758 creator A5000771003 @default.
- W3202744758 creator A5047234703 @default.
- W3202744758 creator A5054822973 @default.
- W3202744758 creator A5062920642 @default.
- W3202744758 creator A5064531067 @default.
- W3202744758 creator A5069389082 @default.
- W3202744758 date "2021-11-01" @default.
- W3202744758 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
- W3202744758 title "Outcomes of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection from a High-volume UK Centre Compared with a National Data Set" @default.
- W3202744758 cites W1576100494 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W1972628101 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2030591145 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2037988802 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2056228246 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2098064059 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2117275981 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2137875927 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2211355314 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2465956917 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2786041668 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2794891969 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2907021732 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W2968006572 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W3090100193 @default.
- W3202744758 cites W44254208 @default.
- W3202744758 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.005" @default.
- W3202744758 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8546923" @default.
- W3202744758 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34723218" @default.
- W3202744758 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3202744758 type Work @default.
- W3202744758 sameAs 3202744758 @default.
- W3202744758 citedByCount "9" @default.
- W3202744758 countsByYear W32027447582022 @default.
- W3202744758 countsByYear W32027447582023 @default.
- W3202744758 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3202744758 hasAuthorship W3202744758A5000771003 @default.
- W3202744758 hasAuthorship W3202744758A5047234703 @default.
- W3202744758 hasAuthorship W3202744758A5054822973 @default.
- W3202744758 hasAuthorship W3202744758A5062920642 @default.
- W3202744758 hasAuthorship W3202744758A5064531067 @default.
- W3202744758 hasAuthorship W3202744758A5069389082 @default.
- W3202744758 hasBestOaLocation W32027447581 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2776212926 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2776694085 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2776938808 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2779511695 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2780014101 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2780227381 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C121608353 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C126322002 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C141071460 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2775862295 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2776212926 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2776694085 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2776938808 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2779466945 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2779511695 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2780014101 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2780091579 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2780192828 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2780227381 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C2780849966 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C31174226 @default.
- W3202744758 hasConceptScore W3202744758C71924100 @default.
- W3202744758 hasLocation W32027447581 @default.
- W3202744758 hasLocation W32027447582 @default.
- W3202744758 hasLocation W32027447583 @default.
- W3202744758 hasLocation W32027447584 @default.
- W3202744758 hasOpenAccess W3202744758 @default.
- W3202744758 hasPrimaryLocation W32027447581 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W2067059195 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W2122877071 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W2182448385 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W2248719375 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W2940674388 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W3000452047 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W3042751706 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W4236914280 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W4239990177 @default.
- W3202744758 hasRelatedWork W4382863740 @default.
- W3202744758 hasVolume "33" @default.
- W3202744758 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3202744758 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3202744758 magId "3202744758" @default.
- W3202744758 workType "article" @default.